• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STEM领域中的文本复用:对近期发表的研究文章的文本分析研究

Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles.

作者信息

Anson Ian G, Moskovitz Cary

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Thompson Writing Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):349-371. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1850284. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2020.1850284
PMID:33180569
Abstract

Text recycling, sometimes called "self-plagiarism," is the reuse of material from one's own existing documents in a newly created work. Over the past decade, text recycling has become an increasingly debated practice in research ethics, especially in science and technology fields. Little is known, however, about researchers' actual text recycling practices. We report here on a computational analysis of text recycling in published research articles in STEM disciplines. Using a tool we created in R, we analyze a corpus of 400 published articles from 80 federally funded research projects across eight disciplinary clusters. According to our analysis, STEM research groups frequently recycle some material from their previously published articles. On average, papers in our corpus contained about three recycled sentences per article, though a minority of research teams (around 15%) recycled substantially more content. These findings were generally consistent across STEM disciplines. We also find evidence that researchers superficially alter recycled prose much more often than recycling it verbatim. Based on our findings, which suggest that recycling some amount of material is normative in STEM research writing, researchers and editors would benefit from more appropriate and explicit guidance about what constitutes legitimate practice and how authors should report the presence of recycled material.

摘要

文本复用,有时也被称为“自我抄袭”,是指在新创作的作品中重复使用自己现有文档中的材料。在过去十年中,文本复用在研究伦理领域,尤其是在科学技术领域,已成为一个备受争议的行为。然而,对于研究人员实际的文本复用行为却知之甚少。我们在此报告对STEM学科已发表研究文章中的文本复用情况进行的计算分析。我们使用在R语言中创建的一个工具,分析了来自八个学科集群的80个联邦资助研究项目的400篇已发表文章的语料库。根据我们的分析,STEM研究团队经常从他们之前发表的文章中复用一些材料。我们语料库中的论文平均每篇包含约三个复用句子,不过少数研究团队(约15%)复用的内容要多得多。这些发现在STEM各学科中总体上是一致的。我们还发现有证据表明,研究人员对复用的文字进行表面修改的情况比逐字复用更为常见。基于我们的研究结果,即表明在STEM研究写作中复用一定量的材料是常态,研究人员和编辑将受益于关于什么构成合法行为以及作者应如何报告复用材料存在情况的更恰当、明确的指导。

相似文献

1
Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles.STEM领域中的文本复用:对近期发表的研究文章的文本分析研究
Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):349-371. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1850284. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective.健康科学研究文献中的文本重复利用:修辞学视角
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z. eCollection 2017.
3
Attitudes toward text recycling in academic writing across disciplines.跨学科视角下学术写作中对文本再利用的态度
Account Res. 2018;25(3):142-169. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1434622. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
4
Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.科学写作中的文字重复问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):813-851. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing.文本复用:科学写作中的自我剽窃。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Nov 9;5(2):134-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Comment on Cary Moskovitz' "Text Recycling in Health Sciences Literature: A Rhetorical Perspective".评卡里·莫斯科维茨的《健康科学文献中的文本循环利用:修辞学视角》。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0026-y. eCollection 2017.
7
Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it.科学研究与出版物中的剽窃行为以及如何预防它。
Mater Sociomed. 2014 Apr;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Re-using text from one's own previously published papers: an exploratory study of potential self-plagiarism.重复使用自己先前发表论文中的文本:对潜在自我剽窃行为的探索性研究。
Psychol Rep. 2005 Aug;97(1):43-9. doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.1.43-49.
9
Plagiarism: Why is it such a big issue for medical writers?抄袭:为何它对医学撰写者而言是个大问题?
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Apr;2(2):67-71. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.80370.
10
How do we handle self-plagiarism in submitted manuscripts?我们如何处理已提交稿件中的自我剽窃行为?
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(2):150-3. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.019.

引用本文的文献

1
A large dataset of scientific text reuse in Open-Access publications.大量科学文本在开放获取出版物中的重复使用数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 26;10(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01908-z.
2
An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication.增加论文平均作者数量的伦理探讨
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 May 23;28(3):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00352-3.