• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学写作中的文字重复问题。

Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.

机构信息

Thompson Writing Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):813-851. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y
PMID:29546574
Abstract

Text recycling, often called "self-plagiarism", is the practice of reusing textual material from one's prior documents in a new work. The practice presents a complex set of ethical and practical challenges to the scientific community, many of which have not been addressed in prior discourse on the subject. This essay identifies and discusses these factors in a systematic fashion, concluding with a new definition of text recycling that takes these factors into account. Topics include terminology, what is not text recycling, factors affecting judgements about the appropriateness of text recycling, and visual materials.

摘要

文本复用,通常称为“自我剽窃”,是指在新作品中重复使用自己先前文档中的文本材料。这一做法给科学界带来了一系列复杂的伦理和实际挑战,其中许多问题在前人对这一主题的论述中并未得到解决。本文以系统的方式确定并讨论了这些因素,最后提出了一个新的文本复用定义,该定义考虑了这些因素。讨论的主题包括术语、不是文本复用的情况、影响对文本复用适当性判断的因素,以及视觉材料。

相似文献

1
Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.科学写作中的文字重复问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):813-851. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
Attitudes toward text recycling in academic writing across disciplines.跨学科视角下学术写作中对文本再利用的态度
Account Res. 2018;25(3):142-169. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1434622. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
3
Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.科学写作中的文字剽窃:中国导师对抄袭的看法以及如何减少学生写作中的抄袭行为
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):569-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9342-7. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
4
Text recycling in STEM: A text-analytic study of recently published research articles.STEM领域中的文本复用:对近期发表的研究文章的文本分析研究
Account Res. 2021 Aug;28(6):349-371. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1850284. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
5
Plagiarism: A Bird's Eye View.抄袭:鸟瞰图。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Nov 20;38(45):e373. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e373.
6
Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct.自我剽窃与文本重复利用:研究不端行为的合理形式。
Account Res. 2014;21(3):176-97. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.848071.
7
Text recycling: Self-plagiarism in scientific writing.文本复用:科学写作中的自我剽窃。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Nov 9;5(2):134-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Writing for publication-Implications of text recycling and cut and paste writing.写作发表——文本重复利用和复制粘贴写作的影响
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Jul;28(5):999-1001. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12868.
9
Is reusing text from a protocol in the completed systematic review acceptable?在完成的系统评价中重复使用方案中的文本是否可以接受?
Syst Rev. 2021 May 3;10(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01675-9.
10
Self-plagiarism, recycling fraud, and the intent to mislead.自我剽窃、重复利用造假及误导意图。
J Med Toxicol. 2008 Jun;4(2):69-70. doi: 10.1007/BF03160957.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of plagiarism among rhinology scientific journals.鼻科学期刊中的剽窃检测。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024 Aug;14(8):1382-1385. doi: 10.1002/alr.23347. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
Brain Structure and Function gets serious about ethical science writing.《脑结构与功能》认真对待符合伦理的科学写作。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 May;228(3-4):699-701. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02645-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: incidence, characteristics and optimization of screening-case study in a major specialty medical journal.提交稿件中的抄袭现象:某主要专业医学期刊的发生率、特征及筛查案例研究的优化
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 Oct 10;1:13. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0021-8. eCollection 2016.
2
Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective.健康科学研究文献中的文本重复利用:修辞学视角
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z. eCollection 2017.
3
Achieving Excellence in Graduate Research: A Guide for New Graduate Students.
《在研究生研究中追求卓越:新研究生指南》
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2015 Jul 17;2(10):1500203. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500203. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments.使用 ATLAS 和 CMS 实验在 sqrt[s]=7 和 8 TeV 的 pp 碰撞中对希格斯玻色子质量的联合测量。
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 May 15;114(19):191803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.191803. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Rethinking authorship in the era of collaborative research.协作研究时代的作者身份再思考。
Account Res. 2015;22(5):267-83. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.968277.
6
Efficacy and safety of RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine with or without a booster dose in infants and children in Africa: final results of a phase 3, individually randomised, controlled trial.RTS,S/AS01疟疾疫苗在非洲婴幼儿中接种或不接种加强剂量的疗效和安全性:一项3期个体随机对照试验的最终结果
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):31-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60721-8. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
7
'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants': Recontextualization in Writing from Sources.“站在巨人的肩膀上”:基于资料写作中的情境重构
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1297-314. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9590-4. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Efficacy and safety of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine during 18 months after vaccination: a phase 3 randomized, controlled trial in children and young infants at 11 African sites.RTS,S/AS01疟疾疫苗接种后18个月的疗效和安全性:在11个非洲地点对儿童和幼儿进行的3期随机对照试验
PLoS Med. 2014 Jul 29;11(7):e1001685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001685. eCollection 2014 Jul.
9
A quantitative perspective on ethics in large team science.大型团队科学中伦理学的定量视角。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):923-45. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9562-8. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
10
Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct.自我剽窃与文本重复利用:研究不端行为的合理形式。
Account Res. 2014;21(3):176-97. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.848071.