• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰牛、羊和鹿中血清型哥本哈根和塔拉萨维和巴伦血清型的血清学研究。

Serological study of serovar Copenhageni and serovars Tarassovi and Ballum in beef cattle, sheep and deer in New Zealand.

机构信息

School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

N Z Vet J. 2021 Mar;69(2):83-92. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2020.1830867. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1080/00480169.2020.1830867
PMID:33183158
Abstract

AIMS

To estimate animal-level seroprevalence of serovar Copenhageni and serovars Ballum and Tarassovi, in beef cattle, sheep and deer on New Zealand farms, and herd/flock-level seroprevalence of any serovar when existing same-sera data for serovars Hardjobovis and Pomona were included, and to determine associations between risk factors and animal-level seroprevalence.

METHODS

Banked sera from sheep (n=82), beef (n=54) and deer (n=62) herds/flocks (n=3,878 animals) from seven regions were analysed using the microscopic agglutination test. Titres of ≥48 were designated positive. Herds/flocks were considered positive if either ≥1, ≥2 or ≥3 animals were positive. Existing same-sera data for serovars Hardjobovis and Pomona were included to establish farm-level any-serovar seropositivity. Factors associated with serological status were analysed using generalised estimating equations.

RESULTS

Animal-level seroprevalence for serovars Ballum, Copenhageni, and Tarassovi, respectively, was 13.7 (95% CI=11.7-16.0)%, 12.6 (95% CI=10.6-14.7)% and 18.0 (95% CI=15.7-20.5)% for beef cattle, 10.5 (95% CI=9.0-12.1)%, 16.7 (95% CI=14.9-18.6)% and 14.0 (95% CI=12.4-15.8)% for sheep and 6.6 (95% CI=5.3-8.2)%, 15.5 (95% CI=13.5-17.7)% and 3.6 (95% CI=2.7-4.8)% for deer, respectively. Herd/flock-level seroprevalence for Ballum was 86.6, 52.4 and 39.0% for sheep, 85.2, 52.7 and 33.3% for beef cattle and 50.8, 27.9 and 21.3% for deer at definitions ≥1, ≥2 and ≥3 seropositive animals per species, respectively. For Copenhageni, corresponding data were 95.1, 73.2 and 56.1% for sheep, 68.5, 48.2 and 29.6% for beef cattle and 73.8, 57.4 and 41.0% for deer, and for Tarassovi, 80.5, 59.7 and 45.1% for sheep, 83.3, 68.5 and 61.1% for beef cattle, and 42.6, 16.4 and 4.9% for deer. Seropositivity to all serovars was observed from all regions, with some differences in seroprevalence observed between species and regions, but not between islands. Combining with Hardjobovis and Pomona data, herd/flock-level seropositivity for all animal species and all five serovars was 100% at definition ≥1 animal positive, and 97.5 and 96.3% for sheep flocks, 87.8 and 97.8% for beef cattle herds, and 89.3 and 75% for deer herds at ≥2 and ≥3 animals positive, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seropositivity to serovars Ballum, Copenhageni and Tarassovi is common in sheep, beef cattle and deer New Zealand and most, or all farms have ≥1 livestock species seropositive to ≥1 serovar.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Serovars Ballum, Tarassovi and Copenhageni should be considered when clinical or subclinical signs of leptospirosis are observed in sheep, beef cattle or deer. Livestock sector workers are potentially at risk of exposure.

摘要

目的

估计新西兰农场牛、羊和鹿的血清学 Copenhageni 血清型和血清型 Ballum、Tarassovi 的动物水平血清阳性率,以及包含 Hardjobovis 和 Pomona 血清型现有相同血清数据时任何血清型的畜群/羊群水平血清阳性率,并确定与动物水平血清阳性率相关的风险因素。

方法

使用显微镜凝集试验分析来自七个地区的 82 只绵羊、54 只牛和 62 只鹿的畜群/羊群的血清(3878 只动物)。将滴度≥48 判定为阳性。如果至少有 1、2 或 3 只动物呈阳性,则将畜群/羊群判定为阳性。包含 Hardjobovis 和 Pomona 血清型的现有相同血清数据用于建立农场水平的任何血清型血清阳性率。使用广义估计方程分析与血清学状态相关的因素。

结果

牛、羊和鹿的血清型 Ballum、Copenhageni 和 Tarassovi 的动物水平血清阳性率分别为 13.7(95%CI=11.7-16.0)%、12.6(95%CI=10.6-14.7)%和 18.0(95%CI=15.7-20.5)%、10.5(95%CI=9.0-12.1)%、16.7(95%CI=14.9-18.6)%和 14.0(95%CI=12.4-15.8)%、6.6(95%CI=5.3-8.2)%、15.5(95%CI=13.5-17.7)%和 3.6(95%CI=2.7-4.8)%。血清型 Ballum 的畜群/羊群水平血清阳性率在绵羊、牛和鹿中分别为 86.6、52.4 和 39.0%、85.2、52.7 和 33.3%、50.8、27.9 和 21.3%;对于 Copenhageni,相应的数据分别为 95.1、73.2 和 56.1%,68.5、48.2 和 29.6%,73.8、57.4 和 41.0%;对于 Tarassovi,分别为 80.5、59.7 和 45.1%,83.3、68.5 和 61.1%,42.6、16.4 和 4.9%。所有地区均观察到对所有血清型的血清阳性,不同物种和地区之间存在血清阳性率差异,但岛屿之间无差异。结合 Hardjobovis 和 Pomona 数据,所有动物物种和所有五个血清型的畜群/羊群水平血清阳性率在定义为≥1 只动物阳性时为 100%,在绵羊群中,≥2 只和≥3 只动物阳性时分别为 97.5%和 96.3%,在牛群中,≥2 只和≥3 只动物阳性时分别为 87.8%和 97.8%,在鹿群中,≥2 只和≥3 只动物阳性时分别为 89.3%和 75%。

结论

血清型 Ballum、Copenhageni 和 Tarassovi 在新西兰绵羊、牛和鹿中普遍存在,大多数或所有农场的≥1 种牲畜对≥1 种血清型呈血清阳性。

临床意义

在绵羊、牛或鹿中观察到钩端螺旋体病的临床或亚临床症状时,应考虑血清型 Ballum、Tarassovi 和 Copenhageni。牲畜部门的工作人员可能有接触的风险。

相似文献

1
Serological study of serovar Copenhageni and serovars Tarassovi and Ballum in beef cattle, sheep and deer in New Zealand.新西兰牛、羊和鹿中血清型哥本哈根和塔拉萨维和巴伦血清型的血清学研究。
N Z Vet J. 2021 Mar;69(2):83-92. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2020.1830867. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Seroprevalence and herd-level risk factors for seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. in sheep, beef cattle and deer in New Zealand.新西兰绵羊、肉牛和鹿群中钩端螺旋体血清阳性率及血清阳性率的群体水平风险因素
N Z Vet J. 2018 Nov;66(6):302-311. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2018.1507770. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
3
Longitudinal serological survey and herd-level risk factors for Leptospira spp. serovars Hardjo-bovis and Pomona on deer farms with sheep and/or beef cattle.鹿场中同时饲养绵羊和/或肉牛时,钩端螺旋体属哈德乔-波维血清型和波摩那血清型的纵向血清学调查及畜群水平的风险因素
N Z Vet J. 2012 Jul;60(4):215-22. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2012.663323. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
4
Molecular typing of spp. in farmed and wild mammals reveals new host-serovar associations in New Zealand.对养殖和野生哺乳动物中 spp. 的分子分型揭示了新西兰新的宿主 - 血清型关联。
N Z Vet J. 2024 Jan;72(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2023.2248930. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
5
Emerging Leptospira strain poses public health risk for dairy farmers in New Zealand.新西兰出现的钩端螺旋体菌株对奶农构成公共卫生风险。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Oct 1;170:104727. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104727. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
6
Leptospirosis in farmed deer in New Zealand : a review.新西兰养殖鹿的钩端螺旋体病:综述
N Z Vet J. 2007 Jun;55(3):102-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2007.36750.
7
A serological survey of leptospiral antibodies in dogs in New Zealand.新西兰犬类钩端螺旋体抗体的血清学调查。
N Z Vet J. 2013 Mar;61(2):98-106. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2012.719212. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
The serological response of working farm dogs to a vaccine containing Leptospira interrogans serovars Copenhageni and Pomona, and L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo.工作农场犬对一种包含问号钩端螺旋体哥本哈根血清型和波摩那血清型以及博氏钩端螺旋体哈焦血清型的疫苗的血清学反应。
N Z Vet J. 2014 Mar;62(2):87-90. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2013.845072. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
A cross-sectional investigation of Leptospira at the wildlife-livestock interface in New Zealand.新西兰野生动植物与牲畜接触界面的钩端螺旋体的横断面调查。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Sep 6;17(9):e0011624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011624. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Presence of Antibodies Against Serovar in Serum Samples from Cattle in Ukraine.乌克兰牛血清样品中针对 血清型的抗体存在情况。
Pol J Microbiol. 2019 Sep;68(3):295-302. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2019-031. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Leptospirosis in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a Nationwide Case-Control Study.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的钩端螺旋体病:全国病例对照研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 8;12:e47900. doi: 10.2196/47900.
2
Longitudinal Testing of Antibodies in Horses Located near a Leptospirosis Outbreak in Alpacas.对羊驼钩端螺旋体病暴发地附近马匹抗体的纵向检测
Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 12;9(8):426. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9080426.
3
Risk Factors for Hospitalisation amongst Leptospirosis Patients in New Zealand.新西兰钩端螺旋体病患者住院的风险因素
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;6(4):188. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6040188.
4
The Seroepidemiology of a Neglected Zoonotic and Livestock Pathogen in Free-Ranging Bovids: Leptospirosis in African Buffaloes ().一种被忽视的人畜共患病和家畜病原体在自由放养牛科动物中的血清流行病学:非洲水牛的钩端螺旋体病()
Pathogens. 2021 Aug 24;10(9):1072. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091072.
5
Seroprevalence of in Racehorses and Broodmares in New Zealand.新西兰赛马和繁殖母马中[具体疾病或物质]的血清阳性率。 (你原文中“Seroprevalence of ”这里应该有具体内容缺失)
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;10(11):1952. doi: 10.3390/ani10111952.