• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 784 例中国结直肠癌患者的血液学参数和血清肿瘤标志物在预测 KRAS 突变中的价值:一项回顾性分析。

The value of haematological parameters and serum tumour markers for predicting KRAS mutations in 784 Chinese colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.

College of life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07551-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07551-4
PMID:33183271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7659200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying the mutation status of KRAS is important for optimizing treatment in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of haematological parameters and serum tumour markers (STMs) for KRAS gene mutations.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with colorectal cancer from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected, and the associations between KRAS mutations and other indicators were analysed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to quantify the predictive value of these factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors of KRAS mutations by calculating the odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

KRAS mutations were identified in 276 patients (35.2%). ROC analysis revealed that age, CA12-5, AFP, SCC, CA72-4, CA15-3, FERR, CYFRA21-1, MCHC, and tumor location could not predict KRAS mutations (P = 0.154, 0.177, 0.277, 0.350, 0.864, 0.941, 0.066, 0.279, 0.293, and 0.053 respectively), although CEA, CA19-9, NSE and haematological parameter values showed significant predictive value (P = 0.001, < 0.001, 0.043 and P = 0.003, < 0.001, 0.001, 0.031, 0.030, 0.016, 0.015, 0.019, and 0.006, respectively) but without large areas under the curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CA19-9 was significantly associated with KRAS mutations and was the only independent predictor of KRAS positivity (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Haematological parameters and STMs were related to KRAS mutation status, and CA19-9 was an independent predictive factor for KRAS gene mutations. The combination of these clinical factors can improve the ability to identify KRAS mutations in CRC patients.

摘要

背景

确定 KRAS 基因突变状态对优化结直肠癌(CRC)患者的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在探讨血液学参数和血清肿瘤标志物(STM)对 KRAS 基因突变的预测价值。

方法

回顾性收集 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月间的 CRC 患者临床资料,分析 KRAS 基因突变与其他指标的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析量化这些因素的预测价值。通过计算比值比(OR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI),应用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归模型来识别 KRAS 突变的预测因子。

结果

在 276 例患者中发现 KRAS 基因突变(35.2%)。ROC 分析显示,年龄、CA12-5、AFP、SCC、CA72-4、CA15-3、FERR、CYFRA21-1、MCHC 和肿瘤位置不能预测 KRAS 基因突变(P=0.154、0.177、0.277、0.350、0.864、0.941、0.066、0.279、0.293 和 0.053),尽管 CEA、CA19-9、NSE 和血液学参数值具有显著的预测价值(P=0.001、<0.001、0.043 和 P=0.003、<0.001、0.001、0.031、0.030、0.016、0.015、0.019 和 0.006),但曲线下面积均不大。多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,CA19-9 与 KRAS 突变显著相关,是 KRAS 阳性的唯一独立预测因子(P=0.016)。

结论

血液学参数和 STM 与 KRAS 突变状态相关,CA19-9 是 KRAS 基因突变的独立预测因子。这些临床因素的组合可以提高识别 CRC 患者 KRAS 突变的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/95db82f857d7/12885_2020_7551_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/20e84ceadaa4/12885_2020_7551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/aead4e371f59/12885_2020_7551_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/95db82f857d7/12885_2020_7551_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/20e84ceadaa4/12885_2020_7551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/aead4e371f59/12885_2020_7551_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/7659200/95db82f857d7/12885_2020_7551_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of haematological parameters and serum tumour markers for predicting KRAS mutations in 784 Chinese colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.对 784 例中国结直肠癌患者的血液学参数和血清肿瘤标志物在预测 KRAS 突变中的价值:一项回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07551-4.
2
The value of FDG PET/CT parameters, hematological parameters and tumor markers in predicting KRAS oncogene mutation in colorectal cancer.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG PET/CT)参数、血液学参数及肿瘤标志物在预测结直肠癌KRAS癌基因突变中的价值
Hell J Nucl Med. 2017 May-Aug;20(2):160-165. doi: 10.1967/s002449910557. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
3
Value of serum tumor markers for predicting EGFR mutations and positive ALK expression in 1089 Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A retrospective analysis.1089 例中国非小细胞肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物预测 EGFR 突变和 ALK 阳性表达的价值:一项回顾性分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial.分析循环DNA和蛋白质生物标志物以预测瑞戈非尼的临床活性并评估转移性结直肠癌患者的预后:CORRECT试验的回顾性探索性分析
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):937-48. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00138-2. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer?基于 CT 的放射组学特征能否预测结直肠癌中的 KRAS/NRAS/BRAF 突变?
Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):2058-2067. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5146-8. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
6
Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal cancer in Chinese patients with KRAS and BRAF mutations.中国KRAS和BRAF基因突变结直肠癌患者的分子病理流行病学
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 24;6(37):39607-13. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5551.
7
KRAS and BRAF gene mutations and DNA mismatch repair status in Chinese colorectal carcinoma patients.中国结直肠癌患者的KRAS和BRAF基因突变及DNA错配修复状态
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 7;21(5):1595-605. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1595.
8
Somatic mutation profiling and HER2 status in KRAS-positive Chinese colorectal cancer patients.KRAS 阳性中国结直肠癌患者的体细胞突变分析和 HER2 状态。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 15;9(1):16894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53039-y.
9
Mutation Status and Prognostic Value of KRAS and BRAF in Southeast Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients: First Report from Southeast of Iran.伊朗东南部结直肠癌患者 KRAS 和 BRAF 的突变状态及预后价值:来自伊朗东南部的首次报告。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Jun;52(2):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00426-8.
10
Analysis of KRAS Mutation Status Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer Based on Medical Imaging.基于医学影像的结直肠癌 KRAS 基因突变状态预测模型分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 22;2021:3953442. doi: 10.1155/2021/3953442. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of heavy metals in the development of colorectal cancer.重金属在结直肠癌发展中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jul 3;23(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11120-w.
2
Laboratory blood test profiling reveals distinct biochemical and hemocyte features of mutated non-small cell lung cancer.实验室血液检测分析揭示了突变型非小细胞肺癌独特的生化和血细胞特征。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):365-375. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-829. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
An exploratory study on TCM syndrome differentiation in preoperative patients with colorectal cancer assisted by laboratory indicators.

本文引用的文献

1
FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab As First-Line Treatment of Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II VOLFI Study (AIO KRK0109).FOLFOXIRI 联合帕尼单抗作为野生型转移性结直肠癌一线治疗:随机、开放标签、II 期 VOLFI 研究(AIO KRK0109)
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3401-3411. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01340. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of miR-200c in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.miR-200c 在胃癌中的诊断和预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Dis Markers. 2019 Apr 4;2019:8949618. doi: 10.1155/2019/8949618. eCollection 2019.
3
The Developing Story of Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.
一项借助实验室指标对结直肠癌术前患者进行中医辨证的探索性研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 14;8(8):e10207. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10207. eCollection 2022 Aug.
结直肠癌预测生物标志物的发展历程
J Pers Med. 2019 Feb 7;9(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jpm9010012.
4
Disparities by province, age, and sex in site-specific cancer burden attributable to 23 potentially modifiable risk factors in China: a comparative risk assessment.中国 23 种潜在可改变风险因素导致的特定部位癌症负担的省际、年龄和性别差异:一项比较风险评估。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e257-e269. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30488-1.
5
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Prognostic Significance of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Cholangiocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.血小板与淋巴细胞比值对胆管癌的预后意义:一项荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 14;2018:7375169. doi: 10.1155/2018/7375169. eCollection 2018.
7
Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis.预处理血液学标志物可预测接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者的临床结局:一项荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Oct;9(10):1220-1230. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12815. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
8
Management and grading of EGFR inhibitor-induced cutaneous toxicity.表皮生长因子受体抑制剂相关皮肤毒性的管理和分级。
Future Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(24):2531-2541. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0187. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018.NCCN 指南解读:结肠癌,第 2.2018 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Apr;16(4):359-369. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021.
10
RE: Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974-2013.主题:1974 - 2013年美国结直肠癌发病模式
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx104.