• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing and maintaining the resilience of interdisciplinary cancer care teams: an interventional study.发展和维护跨学科癌症护理团队的适应力:一项干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05882-3.
2
Investigating a Participatory Intervention in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Teams Using an Integrative Organizational Model: A Study Protocol.使用综合组织模型对多学科癌症护理团队的参与式干预进行调查:一项研究方案。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:798863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798863. eCollection 2022.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes.参与行动研究、混合方法和研究团队:从哲学上并置的方法中学习,以获得最佳的研究结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0636-1.
5
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
6
Improving Identification and Child-Focused Collaborative Care for Children of Parents With a Mental Illness in Tyrol, Austria.改善奥地利蒂罗尔州患有精神疾病父母的子女的识别及以儿童为中心的协作式护理。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 17;10:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00233. eCollection 2019.
7
Community and District Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES): a complex district-level management intervention to improve child survival in Uganda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.社区与地区赋权促进扩大规模(CODES):乌干达一项旨在改善儿童生存状况的复杂地区层面管理干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 11;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1241-4.
8
Evaluation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy (CFWPs) interventions on the health of full-time caregiver employees (CEs): implementation and cost-benefit analysis.评估关爱照顾者的工作场所政策(CFWPs)干预措施对全职照顾者员工(CEs)健康的影响:实施与成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 20;17(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4722-9.
9
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.
10
Supporting Workers to Sit Less and Move More Through the Web-Based BeUpstanding Program: Protocol for a Single-Arm, Repeated Measures Implementation Study.通过基于网络的“站起来”计划支持员工减少久坐并增加活动量:单臂重复测量实施研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 May 4;9(5):e15756. doi: 10.2196/15756.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent profiles of team resilience and their relationship with team performance and turnover intentions among nurses.护士团队复原力的潜在概况及其与团队绩效和离职意愿的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 24;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02880-w.
2
The association between team resilience and team performance in nurses during COVID-19 pandemic: a network analysis.新冠疫情期间护士团队复原力与团队绩效之间的关联:一项网络分析
BMC Nurs. 2023 Feb 25;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01216-w.
3
Investigating a Participatory Intervention in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Teams Using an Integrative Organizational Model: A Study Protocol.使用综合组织模型对多学科癌症护理团队的参与式干预进行调查:一项研究方案。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:798863. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798863. eCollection 2022.
4
Building resilience in oncology teams: Protocol for a realist evaluation of multiple cases.在肿瘤学团队中建立适应力:多案例的现实主义评估方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0268393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268393. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
An Analytic Framework to Assess Organizational Resilience.一个用于评估组织恢复力的分析框架。
Saf Health Work. 2018 Sep;9(3):265-276. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
From Burnout to Resilience: An Update for Oncologists.从职业倦怠到恢复力:肿瘤学家最新情况
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:862-872. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201023.
3
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.针对与癌症患者打交道的医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
4
Prevalence of burnout syndrome in oncology nursing: A meta-analytic study.癌症护理中 burnout 综合征的流行率:一项荟萃分析研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 May;27(5):1426-1433. doi: 10.1002/pon.4632. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Team Resilience as a Second-Order Emergent State: A Theoretical Model and Research Directions.作为二阶涌现状态的团队复原力:一个理论模型及研究方向
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 17;8:1360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360. eCollection 2017.
6
Why Burnout Is So Hard to Fix.为何职业倦怠如此难以解决。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jun;13(6):348-351. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.021964. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Prevalence of oncologists in distress: Systematic review and meta-analysis.处于困境中的肿瘤学家的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1732-1740. doi: 10.1002/pon.4382. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.控制干预措施以减少医生的倦怠感:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):195-205. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674.
9
Resilience and burnout status among nurses working in oncology.肿瘤科室护士的心理弹性与职业倦怠状况
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 14;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12991-016-0121-3. eCollection 2016.
10
Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: the application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches.分析纵向定性数据:轨迹法与重复横断面法的应用
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 2;9:136. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1954-1.

发展和维护跨学科癌症护理团队的适应力:一项干预研究。

Developing and maintaining the resilience of interdisciplinary cancer care teams: an interventional study.

机构信息

Département de gestion, d'évaluation et de politique de santé, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Centre de recherche en santé publique, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal et Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05882-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05882-3
PMID:33183288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7664072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing care to cancer patients is associated with a substantial psychological and emotional load on oncology workers. The purpose of this project is to co-construct, implement and assess multidimensional intervention continuums that contribute to developing the resilience of interdisciplinary cancer care teams and thereby reduce the burden associated with mental health problems. The project is based on resources theories and theories of empowerment.

METHODS

The study will involve cancer care teams at four institutions and will use a mixed-model design. It will be organized into three components: (1) Intervention development. Rather than impose a single way of doing things, the project will take a participatory approach involving a variety of mechanisms (workshops, discussion forums, surveys, observations) to develop interventions that take into account the specific contexts of each of the four participating institutions. (2) Intervention implementation and assessment. The purpose of this component is to implement the four interventions developed in the preceding component, assess their effects and whether they are cost effective. A longitudinal quasi-experimental design will be used. Intervention monitoring will extend over 12 months. The effects will be assessed by means of generalized estimating equation regressions. A cost-benefit analysis will be performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions, taking an institutional perspective (costs and benefits associated with the intervention). (3) Analysis of co-construction and implementation process. The purpose of this component is to (1) describe and assess the approaches used to engage stakeholders in the co-construction and implementation process; (2) identify the factors that have fostered or impeded the co-construction, implementation and long-term sustainability of the interventions. The proposed design is a longitudinal multiple case study.

DISCUSSION

In the four participating institutions, the project will provide an opportunity to develop new abilities that will strengthen team resilience and create more suitable work environments. Beyond these institutions, the project will generate a variety of resources (e.g.: work situation analysis tools; method of operationalizing the intervention co-development process; communications tools; assessment tools) that other oncology teams will be able to adapt and deploy elsewhere.

摘要

背景

为癌症患者提供护理会给肿瘤学工作者带来相当大的心理和情绪负担。本项目旨在共同构建、实施和评估多维干预连续体,以培养跨学科癌症护理团队的适应力,从而减轻与心理健康问题相关的负担。该项目基于资源理论和赋权理论。

方法

该研究将涉及四家机构的癌症护理团队,并将采用混合模型设计。它将分为三个部分:(1)干预措施的制定。该项目将采取参与式方法,而不是强加单一的做事方式,通过各种机制(研讨会、讨论论坛、调查、观察)来制定干预措施,考虑到四个参与机构各自的具体情况。(2)干预措施的实施和评估。本部分的目的是实施前一部分中制定的四项干预措施,评估其效果和成本效益。将采用纵向准实验设计。干预监测将持续 12 个月。效果将通过广义估计方程回归进行评估。将进行成本效益分析,从机构角度评估干预措施的成本效益(与干预相关的成本和收益)。(3)共同构建和实施过程的分析。本部分的目的是:(1)描述和评估用于让利益攸关方参与共同构建和实施过程的方法;(2)确定促进或阻碍干预措施的共同构建、实施和长期可持续性的因素。拟议的设计是一个纵向多案例研究。

讨论

在参与的四个机构中,该项目将为发展新能力提供机会,这些能力将增强团队的适应力并创造更合适的工作环境。除了这些机构之外,该项目还将产生各种资源(例如:工作情况分析工具;干预共同开发过程的实施方法;沟通工具;评估工具),其他肿瘤学团队将能够在其他地方进行改编和部署。