• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善血液处方决策:评估一款血液指南应用程序的功效。

Improving blood-prescribing decisions: Evaluating the efficacy of a blood guidelines app.

作者信息

Watson Paul, Watson Denise, Dhesi Amanpreet, New Helen V, Davidson Anne, Armstrong Richard, Birchall Janet

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Education Team, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2020 Dec;30(6):485-491. doi: 10.1111/tme.12736. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1111/tme.12736
PMID:33184992
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of an app providing national blood transfusion guidelines on prescribing decisions.

BACKGROUND

National, regional and local audits in England consistently show inappropriate use of all blood components; around 15%-20% of red blood cells (RBC) and 20%-30% of platelets and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Hospital transfusion guidelines may be difficult to locate and not agree with national guidelines. We developed and tested a dedicated app providing national evidence-based guidelines for use at the point of care to help clinicians make better decisions when authorising blood.

METHODS/MATERIALS: We identified areas of blood authorisation with high frequency of component use and evidence of widespread unnecessary authorisation. We developed seven representative clinical scenarios where the transfusion of blood components may or may not benefit the adult patient. Responding doctors were invited to select their authorisation choice via an online questionnaire, initially without and then with access to the app. Adherence to guidelines was assessed with and without aid of the app.

RESULTS

Using the app, doctors were much more likely to select the correct decision, in accordance with national guidance. Compared with baseline measurements, decisions improved by 67% for RBC, 58% for platelets and 73% for FFP. These improvements were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Apps such as "Blood Components" can help doctors do "the right thing rather than the wrong thing". Further studies are required to assess the impact of using the app in clinical practice and the effect on blood component management and financial savings.

摘要

目的

评估一款提供国家输血指南的应用程序对处方决策的影响。

背景

英格兰的国家、地区和地方审计一直显示,所有血液成分都存在使用不当的情况;约15%-20%的红细胞(RBC)以及20%-30%的血小板和新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)。医院输血指南可能难以查找且与国家指南不一致。我们开发并测试了一款专门的应用程序,该程序提供基于国家证据的指南,以便在护理点使用,帮助临床医生在授权输血时做出更好的决策。

方法/材料:我们确定了血液授权中成分使用频率高且存在广泛不必要授权证据的领域。我们制定了七个具有代表性的临床场景,在这些场景中,输血成分可能对成年患者有益,也可能无益。受邀回复的医生通过在线问卷选择他们的授权选择,最初不使用应用程序,然后可以使用该应用程序。在有或没有应用程序帮助的情况下评估对指南的遵守情况。

结果

使用该应用程序时,医生更有可能根据国家指南做出正确的决策。与基线测量相比,红细胞的决策改善了67%,血小板的决策改善了58%,新鲜冰冻血浆的决策改善了73%。这些改善具有统计学意义。

结论

诸如“血液成分”之类的应用程序可以帮助医生“做正确的事而非错误的事”。需要进一步研究来评估在临床实践中使用该应用程序的影响以及对血液成分管理和节省资金的效果。

相似文献

1
Improving blood-prescribing decisions: Evaluating the efficacy of a blood guidelines app.改善血液处方决策:评估一款血液指南应用程序的功效。
Transfus Med. 2020 Dec;30(6):485-491. doi: 10.1111/tme.12736. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Insights from developing and evaluating the NHS blood choices transfusion app to support junior and middle-grade doctor decision making against guidelines.从开发和评估 NHS 血液选择输血应用程序中获得的见解,以支持初级和中级医生做出符合指南的决策。
Transfus Med. 2022 Aug;32(4):318-326. doi: 10.1111/tme.12872. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
[Are the indications and choice of labile blood products adapted? National survey on prescriber's knowledge].[不稳定血液制品的适应证及选择是否恰当?关于处方者知识的全国性调查]
Presse Med. 2003 Sep 13;32(29):1352-8.
4
Smartphone Medical App Use and Associated Factors Among Physicians at Referral Hospitals in Amhara Region, North Ethiopia, in 2019: Cross-sectional Study.2019 年,在埃塞俄比亚北部阿姆哈拉地区的转诊医院中,医生使用智能手机医疗应用程序及其相关因素:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):e19310. doi: 10.2196/19310.
5
Use of fresh-frozen plasma at Royal Darwin Hospital: a retrospective audit.达尔文皇家医院新鲜冰冻血浆的使用情况:一项回顾性审计
Intern Med J. 2008 Sep;38(9):686-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01730.x.
6
Attitudes and Behaviours to Antimicrobial Prescribing following Introduction of a Smartphone App.引入智能手机应用程序后对抗菌药物处方的态度和行为
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154202. eCollection 2016.
7
[Inappropriate use of blood components in critical care?].[重症监护中血液成分的不当使用?]
Laeknabladid. 2014 Jan;100(1):11-7. doi: 10.17992/lbl.2014.01.526.
8
Experience of implementing a National pre-hospital Code Red bleeding protocol in Scotland.在苏格兰实施国家院前红色出血急救方案的经验。
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
9
Reduction of inappropriate use of blood products by prospective monitoring of transfusion request forms.通过对输血申请单进行前瞻性监测,减少血液制品的不当使用。
Med J Aust. 1997 Nov 3;167(9):473-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb126674.x.
10
Doctors' practice and attitudes towards red blood cell transfusion at Mthatha Regional Hospital, Eastern Cape, South Africa: A mixed methods study.南非东开普省姆塔塔地区医院医生的红细胞输注实践和态度:一项混合方法研究。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Jun 24;13(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2889.

引用本文的文献

1
The Internet, Apps, and the Anesthesiologist.互联网、应用程序与麻醉医生
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;11(22):3000. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11223000.