Wong Shelley, Roderick Stephanie, Kejda Alannah, Atyeo John, Grimberg Kylie, Porter Brian, Booth Jeremy, Hruby George, Eade Thomas
Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Mar-Apr;11(2):e146-e153. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using diagnostic computed tomography (dCT) for palliative radiation planning, removing the need for a planning computed tomography (pCT) scan.
A sequential 2-stage study was performed. Stage 1 was a retrospective analysis of 150 patients' dCTs and pCTs to review potential barriers to radiation planning, as well as assess the field of view (FOV), patient positioning, couch curvature, and Hounsfield unit (HU) variation, and its dosimetric impact. Stage 2 was a clinical implementation of dCT planning into the clinical care path. Eligible patients were simulated per the standard department protocol in the dCT position. Treatment was planned on the dCT and replicated on the pCT as a backup and comparator. The dCT plan was delivered with cone beam computed tomography (CT) image guidance. After treatment, the delivered plan was recalculated on the modified dCT to compare planned with delivered planning target volume (PTV) dose.
Positron emission tomography-CT imaging was the most suited for diagnostic treatment planning. Metastases in the pelvis, abdomen, thoracic, and lumbar spines were the most reproducible. A curved, full-body vac-bag was designed to enable better replication of the posterior body curvature of dCT for treatment. There was minimal variation in mean HU from dCT to pCT scans. Dose difference due to HU variation in the thorax region due to the low-density tissue had the greatest variation. All patients in stage 2 (n = 30) were successfully treated using the dCT plan. Dosimetric evaluations were conducted comparing dCT and modified dCT plans, with the 95% dose coverage change in PTV between -2% to +2.5%.
For palliative patients with bony and soft-tissue metastases, clinically acceptable plans can be produced using dCT. Diagnostic position can be replicated at treatment, eliminating the need for pCT with implications for streamlining and improving care for patients who require palliative radiation therapy.
本研究旨在探讨使用诊断计算机断层扫描(dCT)进行姑息性放射治疗计划的可行性,从而无需进行计划计算机断层扫描(pCT)。
进行了一项连续的两阶段研究。第一阶段是对150例患者的dCT和pCT进行回顾性分析,以审查放射治疗计划的潜在障碍,并评估视野(FOV)、患者体位、治疗床曲率和亨氏单位(HU)变化及其剂量学影响。第二阶段是将dCT计划临床应用于临床护理路径。符合条件的患者按照科室标准方案在dCT体位进行模拟。在dCT上进行治疗计划,并在pCT上重复作为备份和对照。dCT计划通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CT)图像引导进行实施。治疗后,在修改后的dCT上重新计算已实施的计划,以比较计划靶体积(PTV)剂量与实际实施剂量。
正电子发射断层扫描-CT成像最适合诊断性治疗计划。骨盆、腹部、胸部和腰椎的转移瘤最具可重复性。设计了一种弯曲的全身真空袋,以便更好地复制dCT的身体后部曲率用于治疗。从dCT扫描到pCT扫描,平均HU的变化最小。由于低密度组织导致胸部区域HU变化引起的剂量差异变化最大。第二阶段的所有患者(n = 30)均使用dCT计划成功治疗。进行了剂量学评估,比较了dCT和修改后的dCT计划,PTV的95%剂量覆盖变化在-2%至+2.5%之间。
对于患有骨和软组织转移的姑息性患者,使用dCT可以制定出临床可接受的计划。治疗时可以复制诊断体位,无需进行pCT,这对简化和改善需要姑息性放射治疗的患者的护理具有重要意义。