Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Hepatol. 2021 Apr;74(4):829-837. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been suggested that patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of wait-list dropout would have done poorly after liver transplantation (LT) because of tumour aggressiveness. To test this hypothesis, we analysed risk of wait-list dropout among patients with HCC in long-wait regions (LWRs) to create a dropout risk score, and applied this score in short (SWRs) and mid-wait regions (MWRs) to evaluate post-LT outcomes. We sought to identify a threshold in dropout risk that predicts worse post-LT outcome.
Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, including all patients with T2 HCC receiving priority listing from 2010 to 2014, a dropout risk score was created from a developmental cohort of 2,092 patients in LWRs, and tested in a validation cohort of 1,735 patients in SWRs and 2,894 patients in MWRs.
On multivariable analysis, 1 tumour (3.1-5 cm) or 2-3 tumours, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >20 ng/ml, and increasing Child-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease-sodium scores significantly predicted wait-list dropout. A dropout risk score using these 4 variables (C-statistic 0.74) was able to stratify 1-year cumulative incidence of dropout from 7.1% with a score ≤7 to 39.5% with a score >23. Patients with a dropout risk score >30 had 5-year post-LT survival of 60.1% vs. 71.8% for those with a score ≤30 (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in post-LT survival below this threshold.
This study provided evidence that patients with HCC with the highest dropout risk have aggressive tumour biology that would also result in poor post-LT outcomes when transplanted quickly. Below this threshold risk score of ≤30, priority status for organ allocation could be stratified based on the predicted risks of wait-list dropout without significant differences in post-LT survival.
Prioritising patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplant based on risk of wait-list dropout has been considered but may lead to inferior post-transplant survival. In this study of nearly 7,000 patients, we created a threshold dropout risk score based on tumour and liver-related factors beyond which patients with hepatocellular carcinoma will likely have poor post-liver transplant outcomes (60% at 5 years). For patients below this risk score threshold, priority status could be stratified based on the predicted risk of wait-list dropout without compromising post-transplant survival.
有人提出,肝癌(HCC)患者如果在等待名单上因肿瘤侵袭性而退出的风险较高,那么他们在肝移植(LT)后可能表现不佳。为了验证这一假设,我们分析了长等待区(LWRs)中 HCC 患者退出等待名单的风险,以创建一个退出风险评分,并将该评分应用于短等待区(SWRs)和中等待区(MWRs),以评估 LT 后的结果。我们试图确定一个退出风险阈值,该阈值可以预测 LT 后较差的结果。
使用美国器官共享网络数据库,包括所有在 2010 年至 2014 年期间接受 T2 HCC 优先名单的患者,我们从 LWRs 的 2092 例患者的发展队列中创建了一个退出风险评分,并在 SWRs 的 1735 例患者和 MWRs 的 2894 例患者的验证队列中进行了测试。
多变量分析显示,1 个肿瘤(3.1-5 cm)或 2-3 个肿瘤、甲胎蛋白(AFP)>20ng/ml,以及 Child-Pugh 和终末期肝病模型钠评分的增加显著预测了等待名单的退出。使用这 4 个变量的退出风险评分(C 统计量 0.74)能够分层 1 年的累积退出率,得分≤7 的为 7.1%,得分>23 的为 39.5%。退出风险评分>30 的患者在 LT 后 5 年的生存率为 60.1%,而评分≤30 的患者为 71.8%(p=0.004)。在这个阈值以下,LT 后生存率没有显著差异。
这项研究提供了证据,表明 HCC 患者的退出风险最高,其肿瘤生物学具有侵袭性,即使快速进行 LT,也会导致 LT 后结果不佳。在这个≤30 的风险评分阈值以下,器官分配的优先级可以根据等待名单退出的预测风险进行分层,而 LT 后生存率没有显著差异。
根据等待名单退出的风险为肝癌患者优先进行肝移植一直被考虑,但可能会导致移植后生存质量下降。在这项近 7000 名患者的研究中,我们创建了一个基于肿瘤和肝脏相关因素的退出风险评分阈值,超过该阈值的肝癌患者很可能在肝移植后预后不良(5 年时为 60%)。对于低于该风险评分阈值的患者,可以根据等待名单退出的预测风险对其优先级进行分层,而不会影响移植后的生存。