Liu Hao, Zhang Wei, Di Mengyang, Lee Hang, Shi Liuhua, Wang Xixi, Xingyu Zhang, Powers Colin A, Sethi Vrishketan, Li Xingjie, Xiao Yao, Crane Andrew, Kaltenmeier Christof, Alberola Ramon Bataller, Behari Jaideep, Duarte-Rojo Andres, Hughes Dempsey, Malik Shahid, Jonassaint Naudia, Geller David, Tohme Samer, Gunabushanam Vikraman, Tevar Amit, Cruz Ruy, Hughes Christopher, Dharmayan Stalin, Ayloo Subhashini, Humar Abhinav, Molinari Michele
Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Jan 7;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000619. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
Liver transplantation (LT) provides significant survival benefits to patients with unresectable HCC. In the United States, organ allocation policies for HCCs within the United Network for Organ Sharing criteria do not prioritize patients based on their differences in oncological characteristics. This study assessed whether transplant-associated survival benefits (TASBs) vary among patients with different tumor burden scores (TBS) measured at the time of listing.
We analyzed data from adults applying for HCC MELD exception points between 2002 and 2019, with follow-up until December 2023, using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. TBS was determined based on the largest tumor diameter and number of HCCs. Patients were categorized into low (≤3), intermediate (3.1-5), and high (>5) TBS groups. TASB was measured as the difference in 5-year survival with and without LT.
This study included 36,634 LT candidates. High-TBS patients had higher waitlist dropout rates and marginally lower post-transplant survival, resulting in a significantly greater TASB. The 5-year TASB for the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups were 15.7, 22.1, and 25.0 months, respectively. The adjusted survival benefit expressed in 5-year survival differences was 21.9%, 34.5%, and 39.4% in the low, intermediate, and high TBS groups, respectively (p<0.001).
Higher TBS during listing correlates with greater LT benefits for patients with unresectable HCC within UNOS criteria. We conclude that organ allocation policies in the United States should prioritize patients with high TBS due to their increased risk of dropout and comparable post-transplant survival when compared to patients with less advanced tumors.
肝移植(LT)为无法切除的肝癌患者带来显著的生存益处。在美国,器官共享联合网络标准内针对肝癌的器官分配政策并未根据患者肿瘤学特征的差异对患者进行优先排序。本研究评估了在列入名单时测量的不同肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)的患者中,移植相关生存益处(TASB)是否存在差异。
我们使用移植受者科学注册系统分析了2002年至2019年间申请肝癌终末期肝病模型(MELD)例外点数的成年人的数据,并随访至2023年12月。TBS根据最大肿瘤直径和肝癌数量确定。患者被分为低(≤3)、中(3.1 - 5)和高(>5)TBS组。TASB通过有和无LT的5年生存率差异来衡量。
本研究纳入了36,634名LT候选者。高TBS患者的等待名单退出率更高,移植后生存率略低,导致TASB显著更大。低、中、高TBS组的5年TASB分别为15.7、22.1和25.0个月。以5年生存差异表示的调整后生存益处,低、中、高TBS组分别为21.9%、34.5%和39.4%(p<0.001)。
在列入名单时较高的TBS与符合器官共享联合网络标准的无法切除肝癌患者的LT益处更大相关。我们得出结论,美国的器官分配政策应优先考虑高TBS患者,因为与肿瘤进展程度较低的患者相比,他们退出等待名单的风险增加,且移植后生存率相当。