Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.
Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Feb;51:102282. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102282. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
It is possible that physical inactivity and prolonged sitting could lead to changes in muscle properties or bony limitations which may reduce passive hip extension.
This study explored the association between passive hip extension and sitting/physical activity patterns.
Cross sectional study.
The modified Thomas Test is a clinical test used to characterise hip flexion contracture. This test was used to measure passive hip extension across 144 individuals. In addition, sitting behaviours and physical activity patterns were quantified using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. Cut off points were defined for low/high physical activity (150 min per week), prolonged sitting (>7 h per day) and minimal sitting (<4 h per day). ANOVA testing was then used to compare passive hip extension between three groups, defined using the specified thresholds: low activity & prolonged sitting, high activity & minimal sitting and high activity & prolonged sitting.
A total of 98 participants were allocated to one of the three groups which were shown to differ significantly in passive hip extension (P < 0.001). Importantly, there was 6.1° more passive hip extension in the high activity & minimal sitting group when compared to the low activity & prolonged sitting group.
This study is the first to demonstrate an association between passive hip extension and prolonged sitting/physical inactivity. It is possible that these findings indicate a physiological adaptation in passive muscle stiffness. Further research is required to understand whether such adaptation may play a role in the aetiology of musculoskeletal pain linked to prolonged sitting.
缺乏身体活动和久坐可能导致肌肉特性改变或骨骼限制,从而减少被动髋关节伸展。
本研究探讨了被动髋关节伸展与坐姿/身体活动模式之间的关系。
横断面研究。
改良托马斯试验是一种用于评估髋关节屈曲挛缩的临床测试。该试验用于测量 144 名个体的被动髋关节伸展。此外,使用全球体力活动问卷来量化坐姿行为和身体活动模式。久坐时间(>7 小时/天)和最少坐姿时间(<4 小时/天)定义为低/高身体活动(每周 150 分钟)的界限。然后使用方差分析比较三个组之间的被动髋关节伸展,这三个组是根据指定的阈值定义的:低活动和久坐、高活动和最少坐姿以及高活动和久坐。
共有 98 名参与者被分配到三个组中的一个,这三个组在被动髋关节伸展方面有显著差异(P<0.001)。重要的是,与低活动和久坐组相比,高活动和最少坐姿组的被动髋关节伸展多出 6.1°。
本研究首次证明了被动髋关节伸展与久坐/身体不活动之间存在关联。这种发现可能表明被动肌肉僵硬的生理适应。需要进一步研究以了解这种适应是否可能在与久坐相关的肌肉骨骼疼痛的发病机制中发挥作用。