Suppr超能文献

有和没有腰痛的久坐办公室职员之间的腰骶节律差异:一项横断面研究。

Differences in Lumbar-Pelvic Rhythm Between Sedentary Office Workers with and Without Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Nishimura Takaaki, Tanaka Masayasu, Morikoshi Natsuko, Yoshizawa Tamaki, Miyachi Ryo

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Hokuriku University, 1-1 Taiyogaoka, Kanazawa 920-1180, Japan.

Department of Community-Based Rehabilitation, Nanto Municipal Hospital, 938 Inami, Nanto 932-0211, Japan.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 13;13(10):1135. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101135.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Sedentary office workers (SOWs) often adopt prolonged sitting postures, which potentially disrupt the lumbar-pelvic rhythm (LPR) and contribute to lower back pain (LBP). This study aimed to clarify the group differences in LPR and related physical factors between SOWs with and without LBP.

METHODS

Sixty-three SOWs were divided into LBP ( = 30) and non-LBP ( = 33) groups. The lumbar flexion angle (LF) and lumbar-hip angle difference (LHD), which are indicators of LPR, were measured using inertial sensors during trunk flexion. Hip flexion muscle strength (HFMS) and hip-extension muscle strength (HEMS) were assessed using handheld dynamometry. Hip joint range of motion (ROM) was measured using a goniometer. Lumbar proprioception was evaluated via active joint repositioning, and pain and perception were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis showed significantly greater LF (estimated regression coefficient [ERC]: -2.9, < 0.05) and LHD (ERC: -5.5, < 0.05) during early trunk flexion (ETF) in the LBP group. In the LBP group, LHD during ETF and late trunk flexion were positively correlated with HFMS, and HFMS was correlated with HEMS.

CONCLUSIONS

HFMS may contribute to an altered LPR in SOWs with LBP.

摘要

背景/目的:久坐的办公室职员(SOWs)常常保持长时间坐姿,这可能会扰乱腰骨盆节律(LPR)并导致下背痛(LBP)。本研究旨在阐明有和没有下背痛的久坐办公室职员在腰骨盆节律及相关身体因素方面的组间差异。

方法

63名久坐办公室职员被分为下背痛组(n = 30)和无下背痛组(n = 33)。在躯干前屈过程中,使用惯性传感器测量作为腰骨盆节律指标的腰椎前屈角度(LF)和腰髋角度差(LHD)。使用手持测力计评估髋部屈肌力量(HFMS)和髋部伸肌力量(HEMS)。使用角度计测量髋关节活动范围(ROM)。通过主动关节复位评估腰椎本体感觉,并使用视觉模拟量表、Oswestry功能障碍指数和弗里曼特尔背部意识问卷评估疼痛和感知。

结果

多元回归分析显示,下背痛组在早期躯干前屈(ETF)期间的腰椎前屈角度(估计回归系数[ERC]:-2.9,P < 0.05)和腰髋角度差(ERC:-5.5,P < 0.05)显著更大。在下背痛组中,早期躯干前屈和晚期躯干前屈期间的腰髋角度差与髋部屈肌力量呈正相关,且髋部屈肌力量与髋部伸肌力量相关。

结论

髋部屈肌力量可能导致有下背痛的久坐办公室职员的腰骨盆节律改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b5/12111153/9a48d0cd2209/healthcare-13-01135-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验