Kanna Rishi Mugesh, Perambuduri Ashok Sri, Shetty Ajoy Prasad, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan
Department of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Asian Spine J. 2021 Dec;15(6):817-824. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0182. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Randomized controlled trial.
To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using local graft and allograft.
The choice of bone grafts for ACDF varies among different types: iliac crest, allograft, and substitutes. Availability, cost, and donor site morbidity are potential disadvantages. Local osteophyte grafts are then advantageous and shows to have good fusion.
We randomly sampled participants requiring a single level ACDF for degenerative conditions (n=27) between allograft (n=13) and local graft (n=14) groups. Follow-up of patients occurred at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for arm and neck pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 2-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and lateral disk height. We then assessed radiological fusion using computed tomography (CT) scan at 12 months, and graded as F- (no fusion), F (fusion seen through the cage), F+ (fusion seen through the cage, with bridging bone at one lateral edge), and F++ (fusion seen through cage with bridging bone bilaterally).
There were no significant differences in the age, sex, duration of intervention, blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups (p>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in all functional outcome scores including NPRS for arm and neck pain, NDI, and SF-12 at each visit (p<0.01). We observed a marked improvement in disk height in both groups (p<0.05), but at 1 year of follow-up, there was a significant though slight subsidence (p=0.47). CT at 1 year showed no non-unions. We recorded F, F+, and F++ grades of fusion in 23.2%, 38.4%, and 38.4% in allograft group and 28.6%, 42.8%, and 28.6% in local graft group, respectively, though no significant differences observed (p=0.73).
Marginal osteophytes are effective as graft inside cages for ACDF, since they provide similar radiological outcomes, and equivalent improvements in functional outcomes, as compared to allografts.
随机对照试验。
比较使用自体骨移植和异体骨移植进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后的功能和影像学结果。
ACDF的骨移植选择有不同类型:髂嵴骨、异体骨和替代品。可用性、成本和供体部位并发症是潜在的缺点。局部骨赘移植则具有优势,且显示出良好的融合效果。
我们随机抽取因退行性疾病需要进行单节段ACDF的参与者(n = 27),分为异体骨移植组(n = 13)和自体骨移植组(n = 14)。使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评估手臂和颈部疼痛、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、简短健康调查问卷2项版(SF - 12)以及椎间高度,在6周、3个月、6个月和1年时对患者进行随访。然后在12个月时使用计算机断层扫描(CT)评估影像学融合情况,并分为F - (未融合)、F(椎间融合)、F + (椎间融合,一侧边缘有桥接骨)和F ++ (椎间融合,两侧均有桥接骨)。
两组在年龄、性别、干预持续时间、失血量和住院时间方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。两组在每次随访时,所有功能结局评分均有显著改善,包括手臂和颈部疼痛的NPRS、NDI和SF - 12(p<0.01)。两组的椎间高度均有明显改善(p<0.05),但在1年随访时,有显著但轻微的下沉(p = 0.47)。1年时的CT检查未发现不愈合情况。异体骨移植组的融合等级为F、F + 和F ++ 的分别占23.2%、38.4%和38.4%,自体骨移植组分别为28.6%、42.8%和28.6%,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.73)。
对于ACDF,边缘骨赘作为椎间移植有效,因为与异体骨相比,它们提供了相似的影像学结果和相当的功能结局改善。