• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQOL-R)。对巴西姑息治疗患者的心理测量特性和验证:一项横断面研究。

The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R). Psychometric properties and validation of a Brazilian version on palliative care patients: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS), Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, Bairro Rio, Porto Alegre, CEP 90035-003, Brazil.

Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation At Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 14;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01621-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01621-8
PMID:33189142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7666518/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the psychometric properties, including internal consistency, construct validity, criterion validity, criterion-group validity, and responsiveness, the Reviewed McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL-R), into Brazilian Portuguese-(BrP). Also, to analyze the relationship of the BrP-MQOL-R with the scores on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS 0-10).

METHODS

The BrP-MQOL-R was administered to a sample of 146 adults (men = 78). A team of experts translated the MQOL-R according to international guidelines. Convergent validity and Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed.

RESULTS

The BrP-MQOL-R Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. CFA supported the original four-factor structure, with the following revised model fit-indices: PCLOSE = 0.131, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) rho 2 = 0.918, incremental fit index (IFI) delta 2 = 0.936. The convergence validity is supported by a significant correlation between BrP-MQOL-R total scores and their subscales with KPS and with the single item related to the quality of life. And by a converse correlation with the pain scores in the NPS (0-10). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis showed subjects with KPS equal to or lower than 30% could be discriminated from those with scores on KPS higher than 30% by an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.71, sensitivity = 97%, and specificity = 92%).

CONCLUSION

The BrP-MQOL-R proves to be a reliable instrument for assessing the quality of life (QOL) in palliative care (PC), with primary evidence of validity. BrP-MQOL-R presented adequate discriminate properties to identify distinct conditions that impact the QOL in PC.

摘要

背景

为了评估心理计量特性,包括内部一致性、结构效度、效标效度、效标组效度和反应度,对修订后的麦吉尔生活质量问卷(MQOL-R)进行了巴西葡萄牙语-(BrP)翻译。还分析了 BrP-MQOL-R 与卡诺夫斯基绩效量表(KPS)和数字疼痛量表(NPS 0-10)得分的关系。

方法

BrP-MQOL-R 对 146 名成年人(男性=78 名)进行了测试。一个专家组按照国际指南对 MQOL-R 进行了翻译。进行了收敛效度和验证性因素分析(CFA)。

结果

BrP-MQOL-R 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.85。CFA 支持了最初的四因素结构,以下是修正模型拟合指数:接近概率(PCLOSE)=0.131,Tucker-Lewis 指数(TLI)rho 2=0.918,增量拟合指数(IFI)delta 2=0.936。BrP-MQOL-R 总分与其子量表与 KPS 和与生活质量相关的单一项目之间的显著相关性支持了收敛效度。与 NPS(0-10)中的疼痛评分呈反向相关性。接受者操作特征(ROC)分析表明,KPS 等于或低于 30%的患者可以通过曲线下面积(AUC)=0.71、灵敏度=97%和特异性=92%与 KPS 高于 30%的患者区分开来。

结论

BrP-MQOL-R 是评估姑息治疗(PC)生活质量(QOL)的可靠工具,具有初步的有效性证据。BrP-MQOL-R 具有足够的判别特性,可以识别影响 PC 中 QOL 的不同情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9705/7666518/9809d73abf4e/12955_2020_1621_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9705/7666518/8e9e269f145a/12955_2020_1621_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9705/7666518/9809d73abf4e/12955_2020_1621_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9705/7666518/8e9e269f145a/12955_2020_1621_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9705/7666518/9809d73abf4e/12955_2020_1621_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R). Psychometric properties and validation of a Brazilian version on palliative care patients: a cross-sectional study.麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQOL-R)。对巴西姑息治疗患者的心理测量特性和验证:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 14;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01621-8.
2
Psychometric testing of the translated McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Taiwan version in patients with terminal cancer.翻译后的麦吉尔生活质量问卷台湾版在晚期癌症患者中的心理测量测试。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2003 Feb;102(2):97-104.
3
The Italian McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQoL-R): Psychometrics in Neurological and Neoplastic Populations.意大利麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQoL-R):在神经和肿瘤人群中的心理测量学评估。
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jul;38(3):295-298. doi: 10.1177/08258597221123454. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of McGill quality of life: revised questionnaire in the patients with cancer.麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版在癌症患者中的阿拉伯文版本的跨文化调适和验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1878-1887. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2207220. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population.麦吉尔生活质量问卷 - 加的夫简表(MQOL - CSF)在姑息治疗人群中的可行性、可靠性和有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Sep;14(7):1669-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-2817-8.
6
More comprehensively measuring quality of life in life-threatening illness: the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire - Expanded.更全面地衡量威胁生命疾病的生活质量:扩展版麦吉尔生活质量问卷。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 31;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0473-y.
7
Revision and Validation of the Chinese Version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire for ICU End-of-Life Patients.修订和验证中文版 McGill 重症监护病房临终患者生活质量问卷
J Palliat Care. 2023 Jan;38(1):17-23. doi: 10.1177/08258597211067012. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Cross-Cultural Validation of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R), Korean Version; A Focus on People at the End of Life.《麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版(MQOL-R)韩文版的跨文化验证:关注临终者》
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 1;25(3):110-120. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2022.25.3.110.
9
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.《EORTC QLQ-C30 在乌干达的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x.
10
Psychometric Properties and Factorial Analysis of the Arabic McGill-QoL Questionnaire in Breast Cancer.阿拉伯语版麦吉尔生活质量问卷在乳腺癌患者中的心理测量学特性及因子分析
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Nov 14;15:813-824. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S422369. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The Oxygen-Ozone Adjunct Medical Treatment According to the Protocols from the Italian Scientific Society of Oxygen-Ozone Therapy: How Ozone Applications in the Blood Can Influence Clinical Therapy Success via the Modulation of Cell Biology and Immunity.根据意大利氧-臭氧治疗科学协会的方案进行的氧-臭氧辅助医学治疗:血液中的臭氧应用如何通过调节细胞生物学和免疫来影响临床治疗效果。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Dec 11;12(12):1512. doi: 10.3390/biology12121512.
2
Psychometric Properties and Factorial Analysis of the Arabic McGill-QoL Questionnaire in Breast Cancer.阿拉伯语版麦吉尔生活质量问卷在乳腺癌患者中的心理测量学特性及因子分析
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Nov 14;15:813-824. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S422369. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
More comprehensively measuring quality of life in life-threatening illness: the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire - Expanded.更全面地衡量威胁生命疾病的生活质量:扩展版麦吉尔生活质量问卷。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 31;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0473-y.
2
Measuring the quality of life of people with life-threatening illnesses: the internal structure of the Polish adaptation of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire - Revised.测量危及生命疾病患者的生活质量:《麦吉尔生活质量问卷修订版》波兰语改编版的内部结构
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(4):252-259. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.82645. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
3
Test-retest reliability and measurement error of the Danish WHO-5 Well-being Index in outpatients with epilepsy.
丹麦 WHO-5 幸福感量表在癫痫门诊患者中的重测信度和测量误差。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 6;16(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1001-0.
4
Measuring the quality of life of people at the end of life: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised.测量临终患者的生活质量:修订版麦吉尔生活质量问卷。
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):120-129. doi: 10.1177/0269216316659603. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
5
Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches.社会与健康科学研究中问卷效度与信度测试的原则和方法
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(4):195-201. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.173959.
6
Male-female patient differences in the association between end-of-life discussions and receipt of intensive care near death.临终讨论与濒死时接受重症监护之间关联中的男女患者差异。
Cancer. 2015 Aug 15;121(16):2814-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29417. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
Dying in the hospital: what happens and what matters, according to bereaved relatives.在医院离世:据逝者亲属所言,发生了什么以及什么才重要。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Feb;49(2):203-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
Gender differences in the evolution of illness understanding among patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者对疾病理解演变过程中的性别差异。
J Support Oncol. 2013 Sep;11(3):126-32. doi: 10.12788/j.suponc.0007.
9
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, a proposed tool for distress screening in cancer patients: development and refinement.埃德蒙顿症状评估系统,一种用于癌症患者痛苦筛查的工具:制定与完善。
Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):977-85. doi: 10.1002/pon.1996. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
The quality of care provided to hospitalized patients at the end of life.为临终住院患者提供的护理质量。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1057-63. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.175.