• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案

Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.

作者信息

Danner Marion, Geiger Friedemann, Wehkamp Kai, Rueffer Jens Ulrich, Kuch Christine, Sundmacher Leonie, Skjelbakken Tove, Rummer Anne, Novelli Anna, Debrouwere Marie, Scheibler Fueloep

机构信息

SHARE TO CARE Team, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

SHARE TO CARE Team, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575
PMID:33039998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7549440/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shared decision-making (SDM) is not yet widely used when making decisions in German hospitals. Making SDM a reality is a complex task. It involves training healthcare professionals in SDM communication and enabling patients to actively participate in communication, in addition to providing sound, easy to understand information on treatment alternatives in the form of evidence-based patient decision aids (EbPDAs). This project funded by the German Innovation Fund aims at designing, implementing and evaluating a multicomponent, large-scale and integrative SDM programme-called SHARE TO CARE (S2C)-at all clinical departments of a University Hospital Campus in Northern Germany within a 4-year time period.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

S2C tackles the aforementioned components of SDM: (1) training physicians in SDM communication, (2) activating and empowering patients, (3) developing EbPDAs in the most common/relevant diseases and (4) training other healthcare professionals in SDM coaching. S2C is designed together with patients and providers. The physicians' training programme entails an online and an in situ training module. The decision coach training is based on a similar but less comprehensive approach. The development of online EbPDAs follows the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and includes written, graphical and video-based information. Validated outcomes of SDM implementation are measured in a preintervention and postintervention evaluation design. Process evaluation accompanies programme implementation. Health economic impact of the intervention is investigated using a propensity-score-matched approach based on potentially preference-sensitive hospital decisions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics committee review approval has been obtained from Medical Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel. Project information and results will be disseminated at conferences, on project-hosted websites at University Hospital Medical Center Schleswig Holstein and by S2C as well as in peer-reviewed and professional journals.

摘要

引言

在德国医院进行决策时,共同决策(SDM)尚未得到广泛应用。将共同决策变为现实是一项复杂的任务。这涉及到对医疗保健专业人员进行共同决策沟通方面的培训,并使患者能够积极参与沟通,此外还需以基于证据的患者决策辅助工具(EbPDAs)的形式提供合理、易于理解的治疗方案信息。这个由德国创新基金资助的项目旨在在四年时间内,在德国北部一个大学校园医院的所有临床科室设计、实施和评估一个多组件、大规模且综合性的共同决策项目——称为“分享关爱”(S2C)。

方法与分析

S2C解决了共同决策的上述组成部分:(1)对医生进行共同决策沟通培训;(2)激活并赋予患者权力;(3)针对最常见/相关疾病开发EbPDAs;(4)对其他医疗保健专业人员进行共同决策指导方面的培训。S2C是与患者和提供者共同设计的。医生培训项目包括一个在线培训模块和一个现场培训模块。决策指导培训基于类似但不太全面的方法。在线EbPDAs的开发遵循国际患者决策辅助工具标准,包括书面、图形和视频信息。在干预前和干预后评估设计中测量共同决策实施的有效结果。过程评估伴随项目实施。使用基于潜在偏好敏感的医院决策的倾向得分匹配方法来研究干预的健康经济影响。

伦理与传播

已获得基尔基督教 - 阿尔布雷希茨大学医学院医学伦理委员会的伦理委员会审查批准。项目信息和结果将在会议上、石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因大学医院医疗中心的项目网站上、由S2C进行传播,并发表在同行评审的专业期刊上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/383a9386546c/bmjopen-2020-037575f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/a7cf31d9a546/bmjopen-2020-037575f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/d3167152094c/bmjopen-2020-037575f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/383a9386546c/bmjopen-2020-037575f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/a7cf31d9a546/bmjopen-2020-037575f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/d3167152094c/bmjopen-2020-037575f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7891/7549440/383a9386546c/bmjopen-2020-037575f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital.让共同决策(SDM)成为现实:德国北部一家大学医院大规模长期实施SDM项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e037575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037575.
2
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
3
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.
4
Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program.在神经医学中心通过“共享关爱”计划全面实施共同决策
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 13;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388432. eCollection 2023.
5
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
6
Ready for shared decision making: Pretesting a training module for health professionals on sharing decisions with their patients.准备好共同决策:对健康专业人员进行一项关于与患者分享决策的培训模块的预测试。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):610-621. doi: 10.1111/jep.13380. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
7
Protocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌女性手术治疗中共同决策的实施前与实施后研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 31;5(3):e007698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007698.
8
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评价癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01174-4.
9
Prospectively investigating the impact of AI onshared decision-making in post kidney transplant care (PRIMA-AI): protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study among patients, their support persons and treating physicians at a tertiary care centre.前瞻性研究人工智能在肾移植后护理中的共享决策中的影响(PRIMA-AI):在一家三级护理中心对患者、其支持人员和治疗医生进行的纵向定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):e081318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081318.
10
A scattered landscape: assessment of the evidence base for 71 patient decision aids developed in a hospital setting.分散的景观:对 71 种在医院环境中开发的患者决策辅助工具的证据基础的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01777-x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Long-term results of the ORATOR-study: radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer].ORATOR研究的长期结果:口咽癌的放射治疗与经口机器人手术对比
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Feb;201(2):201-203. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02335-2. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".开发工具 SDM:KOMPASS,支持共享决策制定实施过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312990. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision making: why the slow progress? An essay by Neal Maskrey.共同决策:为何进展缓慢?尼尔·马斯克里的一篇文章
BMJ. 2019 Dec 5;367:l6762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6762.
2
[Shared decision making in breast care centres in North Rhine-Westphalia: results of a 10-year trend analysis].[北莱茵-威斯特法伦州乳腺护理中心的共同决策:一项为期10年的趋势分析结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol.
探讨中国普通公众的医疗决策模式和影响因素:二元逻辑回归分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18338-8.
4
Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre-post trial.德国一所大学医学中心实施全院共享决策对患者的影响:一项前后试验。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):87-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462.
5
The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation.共享决策制定的六个步骤:将理论与实践、测量及实施相联系。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Mar 21;29(2):75-78. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112289.
6
The quality of German - language patient decision aids for oncological patients on the internet.互联网上针对肿瘤患者的德语患者决策辅助工具的质量。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02259-4.
7
Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.影响癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的主要因素:一项递进式整群随机试验的定性过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09778-w.
8
Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review.患者和医疗保健专业人员对衰弱和老年患者围手术期护理中共同决策的感知促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09120-4.
9
Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program.在神经医学中心通过“共享关爱”计划全面实施共同决策
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 13;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S388432. eCollection 2023.
10
Sustainability of large-scale implementation of shared decision making with the SHARE TO CARE program.通过“分享关爱”计划大规模实施共同决策的可持续性。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 23;13:1037447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1037447. eCollection 2022.
在五个组织环境中实施子宫肌瘤选项网格患者决策辅助工具:一项随机阶梯式楔形研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Sep 2;14(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0933-z.
4
Are Patient Decision Aids Used in Clinical Practice after Rigorous Evaluation? A Survey of Trial Authors.患者决策辅助工具在经过严格评估后是否在临床实践中使用?一项对试验作者的调查。
Med Decis Making. 2019 Oct;39(7):805-815. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19868193. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
5
Strategies to evaluate healthcare provider trainings in shared decision-making (SDM): a systematic review of evaluation studies.评估医疗服务提供者在共享决策(SDM)方面培训的策略:评估研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 21;9(6):e026488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026488.
6
A prospective cohort study of shared decision making in lung cancer diagnostics: Impact of using a patient decision aid.一项关于肺癌诊断中共享决策的前瞻性队列研究:使用患者决策辅助工具的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Nov;102(11):1961-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Designing Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Dissemination and Sustainment: Can Implementation Science Help Translate Shared Decision Making Into Routine Practice?设计用于传播和维持的共享决策干预措施:实施科学能否助力将共享决策转化为常规实践?
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Dec 7;3(2):2381468318808503. doi: 10.1177/2381468318808503. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
8
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).改进复杂干预措施的规范化:第 2 部分 - 基于规范进程理论(NPT)评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具的验证。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x.
9
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
10
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.