• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待肝移植患者特征的趋势将导致因临床病情恶化而被从等待名单中移除的比例增加。

Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration.

作者信息

Yi Zinan, Mayorga Maria E, Orman Eric S, Wheeler Stephanie B, Hayashi Paul H, Barritt A Sidney

机构信息

1 Operations Research Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 2 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 3 Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 4 Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 5 Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2017 Oct;101(10):2368-2374. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001851.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000001851
PMID:28858174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5667556/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changes in the epidemiology of end-stage liver disease may lead to increased risk of dropout from the liver transplant waitlist. Anticipating the future of liver transplant waitlist characteristics is vital when considering organ allocation policy.

METHODS

We performed a discrete event simulation to forecast patient characteristics and rate of waitlist dropout. Estimates were simulated from 2015 to 2025. The model was informed by data from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network, 2003 to 2014. National data are estimated along with forecasts for 2 regions.

RESULTS

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis will increase from 18% of waitlist additions to 22% by 2025. Hepatitis C will fall from 30% to 21%. Listings over age 60 years will increase from 36% to 48%. The hazard of dropout will increase from 41% to 46% nationally. Wait times for transplant for patients listed with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) between 22 and 27 will double. Region 5, which transplants at relatively higher MELD scores, will experience an increase from 53% to 64% waitlist dropout. Region 11, which transplants at lower MELD scores, will have an increase in waitlist dropout from 30% to 44%.

CONCLUSIONS

The liver transplant waitlist size will remain static over the next decade due to patient dropout. Liver transplant candidates will be older, more likely to have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and will wait for transplantation longer even when listed at a competitive MELD score. There will continue to be significant heterogeneity among transplant regions where some patients will be more likely to drop out of the waitlist than receive a transplant.

摘要

背景

终末期肝病流行病学的变化可能导致从肝移植等待名单上退出的风险增加。在考虑器官分配政策时,预测肝移植等待名单特征的未来情况至关重要。

方法

我们进行了离散事件模拟,以预测患者特征和等待名单退出率。估计时间为2015年至2025年。该模型依据2003年至2014年器官获取与移植网络的数据构建。同时估计了全国数据以及两个地区的预测数据。

结果

到2025年,非酒精性脂肪性肝炎在等待名单新增患者中的占比将从18%增至22%。丙型肝炎将从30%降至21%。60岁以上患者的登记比例将从36%增至48%。全国范围内退出等待名单的风险将从41%增至46%。终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分在22至27之间的患者的移植等待时间将翻倍。第5地区,其移植时的MELD评分相对较高,等待名单退出率将从53%增至64%。第11地区,其移植时的MELD评分较低,等待名单退出率将从30%增至44%。

结论

由于患者退出,未来十年肝移植等待名单规模将保持稳定。肝移植候选者年龄将更大,更有可能患有非酒精性脂肪性肝炎,即使以有竞争力的MELD评分登记,等待移植的时间也会更长。移植地区之间仍将存在显著差异,一些患者从等待名单上退出的可能性高于接受移植的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/346b/5667556/e78897cf424a/nihms884085f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/346b/5667556/95ea1b27e54e/nihms884085f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/346b/5667556/e78897cf424a/nihms884085f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/346b/5667556/95ea1b27e54e/nihms884085f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/346b/5667556/e78897cf424a/nihms884085f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration.等待肝移植患者特征的趋势将导致因临床病情恶化而被从等待名单中移除的比例增加。
Transplantation. 2017 Oct;101(10):2368-2374. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001851.
2
Effect of Mandatory 6-Month Waiting Period on Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.强制性 6 个月等待期对肝癌患者等待名单和移植结果的影响。
Hepatology. 2020 Dec;72(6):2051-2062. doi: 10.1002/hep.31223. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
4
Variation in access to the liver transplant waiting list in the United States.美国肝脏移植等待名单获取情况的差异。
Transplantation. 2014 Jul 15;98(1):94-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000443223.89831.85.
5
Increasing Liver Transplantation Wait-List Dropout for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Widening Geographical Disparities: Implications for Organ Allocation.肝癌导致肝移植候补者不断退出,且地域差异不断扩大:对器官分配的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Oct;24(10):1346-1356. doi: 10.1002/lt.25317.
6
A novel waitlist dropout score for hepatocellular carcinoma - identifying a threshold that predicts worse post-transplant survival.一种用于肝细胞癌的新的候补者退出评分 - 确定一个可预测移植后生存状况更差的阈值。
J Hepatol. 2021 Apr;74(4):829-837. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
Population-Based Analysis and Projections of Liver Supply Under Redistricting.重新划分选区情况下肝脏供应的基于人群的分析与预测。
Transplantation. 2017 Sep;101(9):2048-2055. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001785.
10
Should All Status 1A Patients Be Prioritized Over High MELD Patients? Concept of Risk Stratification in Extremely Ill Liver Transplant Recipients.所有状态 1A 患者都应优先于高 MELD 患者吗?极危重肝移植受者的风险分层概念。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2121-2129. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002651.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver transplant volume association with presence of heart and lung transplant programs: analysis of SRTR metrics.肝移植量与心肺移植项目存在情况的关联:对器官获取与移植网络(SRTR)指标的分析
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02178-3.
2
Evaluating Challenges in Access To Transplantation for Persons with HIV.评估艾滋病毒感染者获得移植面临的挑战。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2025 Mar 21;22(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s11904-025-00735-2.
3
Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 6 Predictive Models.肝移植后结局:6种预测模型的比较研究

本文引用的文献

1
Decade-Long Trends in Liver Transplant Waitlist Removal Due to Illness Severity: The Impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Policy.因病情严重而导致肝移植候补名单被移除的长达十年的趋势:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心政策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1054-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
2
Aging of Liver Transplant Registrants and Recipients: Trends and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes, Post-Transplantation Outcomes, and Transplant-Related Survival Benefit.肝移植登记和受者的老龄化:趋势及其对等待名单结局、移植后结局和移植相关生存获益的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb;150(2):441-53.e6; quiz e16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.043. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
3
Transplant Direct. 2024 Nov 15;10(12):e1724. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001724. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Differential Effects of Ascites and Hepatic Encephalopathy on Waitlist Mortality in Liver Transplantation by MELD 3.0.MELD 3.0评分下腹水和肝性脑病对肝移植等待名单死亡率的不同影响
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 15;10(6):e1625. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001625. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Changing liver utilization and discard rates in clinical transplantation in the ex-vivo machine preservation era.体外机器保存时代临床移植中肝脏利用率和丢弃率的变化
Front Med Technol. 2023 Feb 23;5:1079003. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1079003. eCollection 2023.
6
Predicting mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis in electronic health records with machine learning.利用机器学习预测电子健康记录中肝硬化患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256428. eCollection 2021.
7
The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.肝移植风险评分可预测肝移植受者的预后。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jun;23(6):927-936. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications-Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.不同适应证肝移植术后冷缺血时间对结局的差异影响——谁有风险?一项协作移植研究报告。
Front Immunol. 2020 May 12;11:892. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00892. eCollection 2020.
9
Patients With Persistently Low MELD-Na Scores Continue to Be at Risk of Liver-related Death.持续低 MELD-Na 评分的患者仍存在肝脏相关死亡风险。
Transplantation. 2020 Jul;104(7):1413-1418. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002997.
10
A Comprehensive Review of Outcome Predictors in Low MELD Patients.低 MELD 患者预后预测因素的全面综述。
Transplantation. 2020 Feb;104(2):242-250. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002956.
Declining liver graft quality threatens the future of liver transplantation in the United States.
肝脏移植供体质量下降威胁着美国肝脏移植的未来。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Aug;21(8):1040-50. doi: 10.1002/lt.24160.
4
Predicting Liver Transplant Capacity Using Discrete Event Simulation.使用离散事件模拟预测肝移植能力
Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug;35(6):784-96. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14559055. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
5
The changing burden of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: model-based predictions.美国丙型肝炎病毒感染负担的变化:基于模型的预测。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 5;161(3):170-80. doi: 10.7326/M14-0095.
6
Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2.概念化模型:ISPOR-SMDM 建模良好研究实践工作组 2 的报告。
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):678-89. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12454941.
7
Declining liver utilization for transplantation in the United States and the impact of donation after cardiac death.美国肝移植供体利用率下降及心死亡后捐献的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Jan;19(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/lt.23547.
8
In-hospital mortality and economic burden associated with hepatic encephalopathy in the United States from 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年美国肝性脑病的住院死亡率和经济负担。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;10(9):1034-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 27.
9
Hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis.失代偿期肝硬化患者的住院再入院率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;107(2):247-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.314. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
10
The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation.供体特征、肝病严重程度和肝移植成本之间的相互作用。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Mar;17(3):233-42. doi: 10.1002/lt.22230.