Suppr超能文献

比较不同类型降压药物通过超声心动图逆转高血压患者左心室肥厚的疗效:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Lanzhou University Second College of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou, China.

Department of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Dec;22(12):2175-2183. doi: 10.1111/jch.14047. Epub 2020 Nov 15.

Abstract

Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. However, there is no clear superiority-inferiority differentiation between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and diuretics in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients. To provide further evidence for choosing the optimal antihypertensive drug for improving LVH, we performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the Cochrane library database, Embase, and Pubmed, and identified 49 studies involving 5402 patients that were eligible for inclusion. It was found that ARB could improve LVH in hypertensive patients more effectively than CCB (MD -4.07, 95%CI -8.03 to -0.24) and BB (MD -4.57, 95%CI -8.07 to -1.12). Matched comparison of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) showed that the effect of ACEI in reducing left ventricular mass index (LVMi) was not effective as that of ARB (MD -3.72, 95%CI -7.52 to -0.11). The surface under the cumulative ranking for each intervention indicated that the use of ARB was more effective among the different types of antihypertensive drugs (97%). This network meta-analysis revealed that the use of ARB in antihypertensive therapy could achieve better efficacy in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients.

摘要

逆转左心室肥厚(LVH)可以降低不良心血管事件的发生率。然而,在高血压患者中逆转 LVH 方面,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和利尿剂之间没有明确的优劣之分。为了提供更多选择改善 LVH 的最佳降压药物的证据,我们对 Cochrane 图书馆数据库、Embase 和 Pubmed 进行了基于随机对照试验(RCT)的网络荟萃分析,确定了 49 项研究,共涉及 5402 名符合纳入条件的患者。结果发现,ARB 比 CCB(MD-4.07,95%CI-8.03 至-0.24)和 BB(MD-4.57,95%CI-8.07 至-1.12)更能有效改善高血压患者的 LVH。肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)的匹配比较表明,ACEI 降低左心室质量指数(LVMi)的效果不如 ARB(MD-3.72,95%CI-7.52 至-0.11)。每个干预措施的累积排序曲线下面积表明,ARB 在不同类型的降压药物中的使用效果更优(97%)。这项网络荟萃分析表明,在高血压治疗中使用 ARB 可以在逆转 LVH 方面取得更好的疗效。

相似文献

6
Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者的降压治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 31;7(7):CD003598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3.

引用本文的文献

5
Hypertensive Heart Disease: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment.高血压性心脏病:机制、诊断与治疗
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 6;25(3):93. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503093. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
The global epidemiology of hypertension.高血压的全球流行病学。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Apr;16(4):223-237. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension.左心室肥厚与高血压。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jan-Feb;63(1):10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验