Suppr超能文献

突尼斯社会状况量表在普通儿科人群中的验证

Validation of the Tunisian Social Situation Instrument in the General Pediatric Population.

作者信息

Rajhi Olfa, Halayem Soumeyya, Ghazzai Malek, Taamallah Amal, Moussa Mohamed, Abbes Zeineb Salma, Hajri Malek, Ben Yahia Houda, Touati Maissa, Fakhfakh Radhouane, Bouden Asma

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.

Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:557173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557173. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to better understand the deployment of the theory of mind (ToM) in Tunisian neurotypical children, we have developed a new tool of assessment of the ToM called the "Tunisian Social Situations Instrument" (TSSI). We opted for the creation of this test in view of the intercultural differences in the development of social skills. Our purpose was to validate this tool in general pediatric population.

METHODS

It was a cross-sectional evaluative study that aimed to validate the TSSI in the general pediatric population. We initially conducted a beta test and a pre-validation study before taking the initial version of the TSSI on 123 neurotypical children. Then, we followed the typical validation procedure: appearance validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability study.

RESULTS

Regarding the validity of appearance, the TSSI was comprehensible and adapted to the Tunisian pediatric population. About content validity, the exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors that explain 69.3% of the total variance. These factors were respectively social clumsiness types 1 and 2, intention attribution, emotional ToM, epistemic ToM, and simple comprehension questions. The subdomains of social clumsiness (types 1 and 2) and emotional ToM had a Cronbach alpha higher than 0.8. This factor structure as well as the significant inter-correlation between subdomains and the global score were in favor of a good construct validity. The internal consistency study showed good reliability of the final version of the TSSI (alpha of Cronbach at 0,809). Regarding the performance of children at the TSSI, we have noticed a significant association between the global score, age, and verbal intelligence.

CONCLUSION

This work offers valuable insights about ToM and provides clinicians with a reliable tool to assess social clumsiness and emotional ToM in typically developing children.

摘要

背景

为了更好地理解突尼斯神经发育正常儿童心理理论(ToM)的应用情况,我们开发了一种新的心理理论评估工具,即“突尼斯社会情境量表”(TSSI)。鉴于社交技能发展存在文化差异,我们选择创建此测试。我们的目的是在普通儿科人群中验证该工具。

方法

这是一项横断面评估研究,旨在验证TSSI在普通儿科人群中的有效性。在对123名神经发育正常的儿童使用TSSI初始版本之前,我们首先进行了一次β测试和预验证研究。然后,我们遵循了典型的验证程序:表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和信度研究。

结果

关于表面效度,TSSI易于理解且适用于突尼斯儿科人群。关于内容效度,探索性因素分析提取了6个因素,这些因素解释了总方差的69.3%。这些因素分别是社交笨拙类型1和2、意图归因、情绪心理理论、认知心理理论以及简单理解问题。社交笨拙(类型1和2)和情绪心理理论的子领域的克朗巴哈系数高于0.8。这种因素结构以及子领域与总分之间的显著相互关联有利于良好的结构效度。内部一致性研究表明TSSI最终版本具有良好的信度(克朗巴哈系数为0.809)。关于儿童在TSSI上的表现,我们注意到总分、年龄和语言智力之间存在显著关联。

结论

这项工作为心理理论提供了有价值的见解,并为临床医生提供了一种可靠的工具,用于评估正常发育儿童的社交笨拙和情绪心理理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f4/7658408/7dd0a1e27649/fpsyg-11-557173-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Tunisian Social Situation Instrument in the General Pediatric Population.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:557173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557173. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of theory of mind in Tunisian verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 17;13:922873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922873. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessing the construct validity of a theory of mind battery adapted to Tunisian school-aged children.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 9;14:974174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.974174. eCollection 2023.
4
Validation of the Tunisian Test for Facial Emotions Recognition: Study in Children From 7 to 12 Years Old.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:643749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643749. eCollection 2021.
6
Assessing Theory of Mind by Humor: The Humor Comprehension and Appreciation Test (ToM-HCAT).
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01470. eCollection 2018.
8
Measuring theory of mind in children. Psychometric properties of the ToM Storybooks.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Nov;38(10):1907-30. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0585-3. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
9
Validation of the Tunisian Empathy Scale for Children (TESC) in General Population and Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 18;13:903966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.903966. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between impostor syndrome among doctoral students and supervisor empathy in Tunisia.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1382969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382969. eCollection 2024.
2
Toward an integrative socio-cognitive approach in autism spectrum disorder: NEAR method adaptation-study protocol.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:940066. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.940066. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the construct validity of a theory of mind battery adapted to Tunisian school-aged children.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 9;14:974174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.974174. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessment of theory of mind in Tunisian verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 17;13:922873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922873. eCollection 2022.
5
Validation of the Tunisian Empathy Scale for Children (TESC) in General Population and Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 18;13:903966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.903966. eCollection 2022.
6
Validation of the Tunisian Test for Facial Emotions Recognition: Study in Children From 7 to 12 Years Old.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:643749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643749. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review and Inventory of Theory of Mind Measures for Young Children.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 15;10:2905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02905. eCollection 2019.
2
Emotion Knowledge, Theory of Mind, and Language in Young Children: Testing a Comprehensive Conceptual Model.
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02144. eCollection 2019.
3
Theory of mind across lifespan from ages 16 to 81 years.
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Nov;100(Pt B):106349. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.044. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
5
Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Direct Comparisons.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 24;9:504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00504. eCollection 2018.
6
Faux-Pas Test: A Proposal of a Standardized Short Version.
Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2018 Jun 26. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.FEAR.061518.
7
Advanced theory of mind in adolescence: Do age, gender and friendship style play a role?
J Adolesc. 2017 Apr;56:145-156. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Neurocognitive considerations when assessing Theory of Mind in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Oct;28(3):233-241. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2016.1268141.
9
Age Differences in Cognitive and Affective Theory of Mind: Concurrent Contributions of Neurocognitive Performance, Sex, and Pulse Pressure.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jan;72(1):71-81. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw088. Epub 2016 Aug 7.
10
Portuguese Adaptation of a Faux Pas Test and a Theory of Mind Picture Stories Task.
Psychopathology. 2016;49(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000444689. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验