Rajhi Olfa, Halayem Soumeyya, Ghazzai Malek, Taamallah Amal, Moussa Mohamed, Abbes Zeineb Salma, Hajri Malek, Ben Yahia Houda, Touati Maissa, Fakhfakh Radhouane, Bouden Asma
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 29;11:557173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557173. eCollection 2020.
In order to better understand the deployment of the theory of mind (ToM) in Tunisian neurotypical children, we have developed a new tool of assessment of the ToM called the "Tunisian Social Situations Instrument" (TSSI). We opted for the creation of this test in view of the intercultural differences in the development of social skills. Our purpose was to validate this tool in general pediatric population.
It was a cross-sectional evaluative study that aimed to validate the TSSI in the general pediatric population. We initially conducted a beta test and a pre-validation study before taking the initial version of the TSSI on 123 neurotypical children. Then, we followed the typical validation procedure: appearance validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability study.
Regarding the validity of appearance, the TSSI was comprehensible and adapted to the Tunisian pediatric population. About content validity, the exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors that explain 69.3% of the total variance. These factors were respectively social clumsiness types 1 and 2, intention attribution, emotional ToM, epistemic ToM, and simple comprehension questions. The subdomains of social clumsiness (types 1 and 2) and emotional ToM had a Cronbach alpha higher than 0.8. This factor structure as well as the significant inter-correlation between subdomains and the global score were in favor of a good construct validity. The internal consistency study showed good reliability of the final version of the TSSI (alpha of Cronbach at 0,809). Regarding the performance of children at the TSSI, we have noticed a significant association between the global score, age, and verbal intelligence.
This work offers valuable insights about ToM and provides clinicians with a reliable tool to assess social clumsiness and emotional ToM in typically developing children.
为了更好地理解突尼斯神经发育正常儿童心理理论(ToM)的应用情况,我们开发了一种新的心理理论评估工具,即“突尼斯社会情境量表”(TSSI)。鉴于社交技能发展存在文化差异,我们选择创建此测试。我们的目的是在普通儿科人群中验证该工具。
这是一项横断面评估研究,旨在验证TSSI在普通儿科人群中的有效性。在对123名神经发育正常的儿童使用TSSI初始版本之前,我们首先进行了一次β测试和预验证研究。然后,我们遵循了典型的验证程序:表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和信度研究。
关于表面效度,TSSI易于理解且适用于突尼斯儿科人群。关于内容效度,探索性因素分析提取了6个因素,这些因素解释了总方差的69.3%。这些因素分别是社交笨拙类型1和2、意图归因、情绪心理理论、认知心理理论以及简单理解问题。社交笨拙(类型1和2)和情绪心理理论的子领域的克朗巴哈系数高于0.8。这种因素结构以及子领域与总分之间的显著相互关联有利于良好的结构效度。内部一致性研究表明TSSI最终版本具有良好的信度(克朗巴哈系数为0.809)。关于儿童在TSSI上的表现,我们注意到总分、年龄和语言智力之间存在显著关联。
这项工作为心理理论提供了有价值的见解,并为临床医生提供了一种可靠的工具,用于评估正常发育儿童的社交笨拙和情绪心理理论。