Beauchemin Hugues, Möröy Tarik
Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Genet. 2020 Oct 26;11:591099. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.591099. eCollection 2020.
Growth factor independence 1 (GFI1) and the closely related protein GFI1B are small nuclear proteins that act as DNA binding transcriptional repressors. Both recognize the same consensus DNA binding motif their C-terminal zinc finger domains and regulate the expression of their target genes by recruiting chromatin modifiers such as histone deacetylases (HDACs) and demethylases (LSD1) by using an N-terminal SNAG domain that comprises only 20 amino acids. The only region that is different between both proteins is the region that separates the zinc finger domains and the SNAG domain. Both proteins are co-expressed in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and, to some extent, in multipotent progenitors (MPPs), but expression is specified as soon as early progenitors and show signs of lineage bias. While expression of GFI1 is maintained in lymphoid primed multipotent progenitors (LMPPs) that have the potential to differentiate into both myeloid and lymphoid cells, GFI1B expression is no longer detectable in these cells. By contrast, GFI1 expression is lost in megakaryocyte precursors (MKPs) and in megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs), which maintain a high level of GFI1B expression. Consequently, GFI1 drives myeloid and lymphoid differentiation and GFI1B drives the development of megakaryocytes, platelets, and erythrocytes. How such complementary cell type- and lineage-specific functions of GFI1 and GFI1B are maintained is still an unresolved question in particular since they share an almost identical structure and very similar biochemical modes of actions. The cell type-specific accessibility of GFI1/1B binding sites may explain the fact that very similar transcription factors can be responsible for very different transcriptional programming. An additional explanation comes from recent data showing that both proteins may have additional non-transcriptional functions. GFI1 interacts with a number of proteins involved in DNA repair and lack of GFI1 renders HSCs highly susceptible to DNA damage-induced death and restricts their proliferation. In contrast, GFI1B binds to proteins of the beta-catenin/Wnt signaling pathway and lack of GFI1B leads to an expansion of HSCs and MKPs, illustrating the different impact that GFI1 or GFI1B has on HSCs. In addition, GFI1 and GFI1B are required for endothelial cells to become the first blood cells during early murine development and are among those transcription factors needed to convert adult endothelial cells or fibroblasts into HSCs. This role of GFI1 and GFI1B bears high significance for the ongoing effort to generate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for the autologous treatment of blood disorders such as leukemia and lymphoma.
生长因子独立性 1(GFI1)和密切相关的蛋白质 GFI1B 是小核蛋白,作为 DNA 结合转录抑制因子发挥作用。两者都识别相同的共有 DNA 结合基序——它们的 C 末端锌指结构域,并通过使用仅包含 20 个氨基酸的 N 末端 SNAG 结构域招募染色质修饰剂,如组蛋白脱乙酰酶(HDACs)和去甲基酶(LSD1),来调节其靶基因的表达。这两种蛋白质之间唯一不同的区域是分隔锌指结构域和 SNAG 结构域的区域。这两种蛋白质在造血干细胞(HSCs)中共同表达,并且在一定程度上也在多能祖细胞(MPPs)中共同表达,但在早期祖细胞中表达就开始分化,并显示出谱系偏向的迹象。虽然 GFI1 的表达在具有分化为髓系和淋巴系细胞潜力的淋巴系定向多能祖细胞(LMPPs)中得以维持,但在这些细胞中已检测不到 GFI1B 的表达。相比之下,在巨核细胞前体(MKPs)和巨核细胞 - 红细胞祖细胞(MEPs)中 GFI1 的表达消失,而这些细胞维持高水平的 GFI1B 表达。因此,GFI1 驱动髓系和淋巴系分化,而 GFI1B 驱动巨核细胞、血小板和红细胞的发育。GFI1 和 GFI1B 这种互补的细胞类型和谱系特异性功能是如何维持的,仍然是一个未解决的问题,特别是因为它们具有几乎相同的结构和非常相似的生化作用模式。GFI1/1B 结合位点的细胞类型特异性可及性可能解释了这样一个事实,即非常相似的转录因子可以负责非常不同的转录编程。另一种解释来自最近的数据,表明这两种蛋白质可能具有额外的非转录功能。GFI1 与许多参与 DNA 修复的蛋白质相互作用,缺乏 GFI1 会使造血干细胞极易受到 DNA 损伤诱导的死亡影响,并限制其增殖。相比之下,GFI1B 与β-连环蛋白/Wnt 信号通路的蛋白质结合,缺乏 GFI1B 会导致造血干细胞和巨核细胞前体的扩增,这说明了 GFI1 或 GFI1B 对造血干细胞的不同影响。此外,在小鼠早期发育过程中,内皮细胞要成为第一批血细胞需要 GFI1 和 GFI1B,并且它们是将成年内皮细胞或成纤维细胞转化为造血干细胞所需的转录因子之一。GFI1 和 GFI1B 的这种作用对于当前为白血病和淋巴瘤等血液疾病的自体治疗而努力生成造血干细胞和祖细胞具有重要意义。