Kephe Priscilla Ntuchu, Ayisi Kingsley Kwabena, Petja Brilliant Mareme
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga, 0727, Polokwane, South Africa.
Risk and Vulnerability Science Centre, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga, 0727, South Africa.
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 3;6(11):e04989. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04989. eCollection 2020 Nov.
Smallholder farmers in South Africa continue to be affected by the changing climate despite the existence of support to improve their adaptive capacity. This study focused on the institutional support systems and support types available to farmers in agro-ecological zones of Limpopo Province and assessed support types best suited to each area. Six hundred farmers were purposively sampled across the agro-ecological zones of Limpopo and interviewed. Support types looked at included monetary, machinery, seeds, educational support and others (irrigation scheme, animals, fertilizer, pesticides). Supporting institutions included Agro finance institutions, DAFF, Banks, and NGOs. Results showed that 70.01% of farmers received support from DAFF 25.60% from NGO's and 4.39% from Agro finance institutions. The most number of support received was two types 33.3% of the farmers. The result from the ANOVA showed that there were no significant differences in the level of difficulty experienced by farmers in accessing the various support institutions across the agro-ecological zones. In terms of the various support types received, there was a statistically significant difference in seeds (p = 0.002 < α = 0.05) and educational (p = 0.0001 < α = 0.05) support received between the different areas. Furthermore, the support needs varied across zones with farmers in arid-zone needing machinery, education, seeds and lastly monetary support while the semi-arid zone needed machinery, education, others, seeds, monetary and the humid, machinery, education, others, money and seeds. It is therefore recommended that support for farmers should be location-specific in order to enhance the adaptive capacity of an area and not be based only on the availability of certain support. There is a need for proper coordination between institutions in their aim to assist farmers to cope with climate change.
尽管存在旨在提高适应能力的支持措施,但南非的小农户仍持续受到气候变化的影响。本研究聚焦于林波波省农业生态区农民可获得的制度支持体系和支持类型,并评估了最适合每个地区的支持类型。在林波波省的农业生态区有目的地抽取了600名农民进行访谈。考察的支持类型包括资金、机械、种子、教育支持及其他(灌溉设施、牲畜、化肥、农药)。支持机构包括农业金融机构、农业、林业和渔业部、银行及非政府组织。结果显示,70.01%的农民获得了农业、林业和渔业部的支持,25.60%获得了非政府组织的支持,4.39%获得了农业金融机构的支持。获得支持种类最多的是两种,占农民总数的33.3%。方差分析结果表明,农民在不同农业生态区获取各类支持机构的难度水平没有显著差异。就获得的各类支持类型而言,不同地区在种子(p = 0.002 < α = 0.05)和教育支持(p = 0.0001 < α = 0.05)方面存在统计学显著差异。此外,不同区域的支持需求各不相同,干旱地区的农民需要机械、教育、种子,最后才是资金支持;半干旱地区需要机械、教育、其他、种子、资金;湿润地区需要机械、教育、其他、资金和种子。因此,建议对农民的支持应因地制宜,以增强一个地区的适应能力,而不应仅基于某些支持的可得性。各机构在协助农民应对气候变化的目标上需要进行适当协调。