Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St, Ste 354, Columbia, SC 29208. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Nov 1;26(11):e369-e375. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88532.
To assess whether a care coordination and caregiver support intervention reduced use of acute medical services for both patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and their caregivers.
Data were collected from patients with AD (n = 101) and their caregivers (n = 63) at Greenville Health System (now Prisma Health) in late 2012. Their data were linked to secondary all-payer claims data in South Carolina between 2011 and 2014.
We conducted both a difference-in-differences regression and segmented regression analysis on the patients' health care utilization patterns pre- and post intervention. Propensity score matching identified a control group composed of nonintervention patients with AD in South Carolina (n = 928). We examined caregiver differences via t tests of differences in means.
Overall, the Memory Program did not reduce acute medical services. However, program participants experienced increases in total charges ($5243; 95% CI, $977-$9510) and in inpatient admissions with AD as a diagnosis (0.15; 95% CI, 0.029-0.272) but no increase in total all-cause charges. Intervention patients also had fewer emergency department (ED) visits (-0.0538; 95% CI, -0.102 to -0.0052) in some analyses. Finally, results suggest that post intervention, caregivers had half as many acute visits with depression as a diagnosis (from 0.22 to 0.11, difference of 0.11; 95% CI, -0.242 to 0.0198).
Although care coordination did not decrease overall acute health services use, coordination improved clinical documentation of patients' memory impairment. ED visits may have begun to decrease among patients. Finally, stress levels may have fallen among caregivers.
评估护理协调和照顾者支持干预是否减少了阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者及其照顾者对急性医疗服务的使用。
数据收集于 2012 年末 Greenville Health System(现为 Prisma Health)的 AD 患者(n=101)及其照顾者(n=63)。他们的数据与 2011 年至 2014 年南卡罗来纳州的二级所有支付者索赔数据相关联。
我们对干预前后患者的医疗保健利用模式进行了差异中的差异回归和分段回归分析。倾向评分匹配确定了南卡罗来纳州非干预性 AD 患者的对照组(n=928)。我们通过 t 检验差异均值来检查照顾者差异。
总体而言,记忆计划并未减少急性医疗服务。然而,该计划的参与者经历了总费用的增加(5243 美元;95%CI,977 美元至 9510 美元)和 AD 作为诊断的住院人数增加(0.15;95%CI,0.029 至 0.272),但总所有原因费用没有增加。干预组的急诊部就诊次数也有所减少(-0.0538;95%CI,-0.102 至-0.0052)。最后,结果表明,干预后,照顾者作为诊断的急性就诊次数减少了一半(从 0.22 次降至 0.11 次,差异为 0.11;95%CI,-0.242 至 0.0198)。
尽管护理协调并没有减少整体急性卫生服务的使用,但协调改善了患者记忆障碍的临床记录。患者的急诊就诊次数可能开始减少。最后,照顾者的压力水平可能有所下降。