Suppr超能文献

评估断水对农场肉鸡安乐死方法效果的影响。

Assessing the effect of water deprivation on the efficacy of on-farm euthanasia methods for broiler chickens.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Campbell Centre for Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 2021 Apr;62(2):157-165. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2020.1849557. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract
  1. Moribund or diseased poultry requiring euthanasia are often dehydrated. To understand how dehydration influences the efficacy of various killing methods, this experiment investigated the effect of water deprivation (WD) on times to unconsciousness and death.2. Broiler chickens (n = 179) were water-deprived for 0, 24, 48 or 72 hours to mimic dehydration, then killed manual cervical dislocation, mechanical cervical dislocation (Koechner Euthanising Device (KED)), or non-penetrating captive bolt (Zephyr-EXL), at 8, 22, 36 or 50 d of age. Degree of WD was confirmed by skin turgor, packed cell volume and body weight loss. Method efficacy was evaluated by the time to unconsciousness and death using pupillary light (PUP), palpebral blink (PAL) and nictitating membrane (NIC) reflexes, feather erection (FE), cloacal winking (CW) and convulsions (CN). The extent of damage caused by each method was examined radiography, gross pathology and histopathology. The main effects of WD time and euthanasia method were analysed by two-way analyses of variance (CRD, PROC MIXED, SAS 9.4) with contrasts to compare water-deprived versus non-water-deprived (NON) birds.3. Skin turgor, packed cell volume and body weight loss had a quadratic relationship with WD, with highest values for those birds which were water-deprived for 72 h. WD level did not affect time to unconsciousness. Time to death was longer for WD birds than NON, with longer latencies to FE, CW and CN for water-deprived birds. WD only affected radiography or gross pathology scores on d 8, with the extent of subcutaneous haemorrhage within the neck decreasing as WD increased.4. The shortest latency to PUP loss, at all ages, and to PAL and NIC loss, at 22 d, was with the Zephyr-EXL. KED had the longest time to unconsciousness (PUP, PAL and NIC), at all ages, and to death, at 36 and 50 d.5. Overall, WD increased time to death, but did not affect the onset of unconsciousness, with no interaction between methods and WD level.
摘要
  1. 需要安乐死的濒死或患病家禽通常会出现脱水。为了了解脱水如何影响各种杀戮方法的效果,本实验研究了脱水对无意识和死亡时间的影响。

  2. 肉鸡(n=179)被剥夺饮水 0、24、48 或 72 小时,以模拟脱水,然后在 8、22、36 或 50 日龄时通过手动颈部脱位、机械颈部脱位(Koechner 安乐死装置(KED))或非穿透性 captive bolt(Zephyr-EXL)进行安乐死。脱水程度通过皮肤弹性、红细胞压积和体重减轻来确认。使用瞳孔光(PUP)、眼睑眨眼(PAL)和瞬膜反射(NIC)、羽毛竖立(FE)、泄殖腔眨眼(CW)和抽搐(CN)评估方法效果。通过放射照相、大体病理学和组织病理学检查检查每种方法造成的损伤程度。通过双向方差分析(CRD、PROC MIXED、SAS 9.4)分析 WD 时间和安乐死方法的主要影响,并进行对比以比较脱水与非脱水(NON)鸟类。

  3. 皮肤弹性、红细胞压积和体重减轻与 WD 呈二次关系,脱水 72 小时的鸟类值最高。WD 水平不影响无意识时间。与 NON 鸟类相比,WD 鸟类的死亡时间更长,FE、CW 和 CN 的潜伏期更长。WD 仅影响第 8 天的放射照相或大体病理学评分,随着 WD 增加,颈部皮下出血的程度减少。

  4. 所有年龄的 PUP 丧失最短潜伏期,以及 22 日龄时 PAL 和 NIC 丧失最短潜伏期,均为 Zephyr-EXL。KED 在所有年龄的无意识时间(PUP、PAL 和 NIC)最长,36 和 50 日龄的死亡时间最长。

  5. 总体而言,WD 增加了死亡时间,但不影响无意识的发生,方法和 WD 水平之间没有相互作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验