Suppr超能文献

血流限制运动时肢体闭塞压的变异性及其与参与者特征的关系。

Limb occlusion pressure for blood flow restricted exercise: Variability and relations with participant characteristics.

机构信息

Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.

Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Jan;47:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.026. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess lower-extremity blood flow restricted exercise (BFR) limb occlusion pressure (LOP) variability and identify related intrinsic characteristics using a portable Delphi BFR system.

DESIGN

Repeated measures.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-two healthy males (n = 25) and females (n = 17) (25.8 ± 5.2 y, 1.76 ±0 .09 m, 78.9 ± 14.9 kg) completed two visits. Brachial artery blood pressure, thigh circumferences (TC), and LOP were measured supine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) and generalizability theory were used to evaluate LOP between legs and days, determine intrinsic characteristic relations, and assess random variance components.

RESULTS

LOP was not different between legs (p = .730) or days (p = .916; grand mean = 183.7 mmHg [178.4, 189.1]). LOP varied significantly between participants (p = .011, standard error = 47.3 mmHg). 47% of LOP variance was between participants, 18% and 6% was within participants between days and legs, respectively, and 28% was associated with random error. The relative error variance was 14.4 mmHg. Pulse pressure (PP) (p = .005) and TC (p = .040) were positively associated with LOP. A LMM including PP and TC predicted LOP with a mean absolute difference of 11.1 mmHg [9.7, 12.6] compared to measured LOP.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative error variance suggests that clinicians should measure LOP consistently for each patient to ensure BFR safety and effectiveness.

摘要

目的

使用便携式血液限制训练(BFR)系统评估下肢血流受限运动(BFR)肢体闭塞压力(LOP)的变异性,并确定相关的内在特征。

设计

重复测量。

设置

实验室。

参与者

42 名健康男性(n=25)和女性(n=17)(25.8±5.2 岁,1.76±0.09 米,78.9±14.9 公斤)完成了两次访问。测量仰卧位肱动脉血压、大腿周长(TC)和 LOP。

主要观察指标

线性混合效应模型(LMM)和概化理论用于评估腿间和天间的 LOP,确定内在特征关系,并评估随机方差分量。

结果

LOP 腿间无差异(p=0.730)或天间无差异(p=0.916;总平均值为 183.7mmHg[178.4,189.1])。LOP 参与者间差异显著(p=0.011,标准误差 47.3mmHg)。LOP 变异的 47%来自于参与者间,18%和 6%分别来自于参与者内天间和腿间,28%与随机误差相关。相对误差方差为 14.4mmHg。脉压(PP)(p=0.005)和 TC(p=0.040)与 LOP 呈正相关。包括 PP 和 TC 的 LMM 预测 LOP 与实测 LOP 相比,平均绝对差为 11.1mmHg[9.7,12.6]。

结论

相对误差方差表明,临床医生应始终如一地为每位患者测量 LOP,以确保 BFR 的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验