Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1707. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09674-6.
Despite worldwide calls for precautionary measures to combat COVID-19, the public's preventive intention still varies significantly among different regions. Exploring the influencing factors of the public's preventive intention is very important to curtail the spread of COVID-19. Previous studies have found that fear can effectively improve the public's preventive intention, but they ignore the impact of differences in cultural values. The present study examines the combined effect of fear and collectivism on the public's preventive intention towards COVID-19 through the analysis of social media big data.
The Sina microblog posts of 108,914 active users from Chinese mainland 31 provinces were downloaded. The data was retrieved from January 11 to February 21, 2020. Afterwards, we conducted a province-level analysis of the contents of downloaded posts. Three lexicons were applied to automatically recognise the scores of fear, collectivism, and preventive intention of 31 provinces. After that, a multiple regression model was established to examine the combined effect of fear and collectivism on the public's preventive intention towards COVID-19. The simple slope test and the Johnson-Neyman technique were used to test the interaction of fear and collectivism on preventive intention.
The study reveals that: (a) both fear and collectivism can positively predict people's preventive intention and (b) there is an interaction of fear and collectivism on people's preventive intention, where fear and collectivism reduce each other's positive influence on people's preventive intention.
The promotion of fear on people's preventive intention may be limited and conditional, and values of collectivism can well compensate for the promotion of fear on preventive intention. These results provide scientific inspiration on how to enhance the public's preventive intention towards COVID-19 effectively.
尽管全球呼吁采取预防措施来应对 COVID-19,但公众的预防意愿在不同地区仍存在显著差异。探索公众预防意愿的影响因素对于遏制 COVID-19 的传播非常重要。先前的研究发现,恐惧可以有效地提高公众的预防意愿,但它们忽略了文化价值观差异的影响。本研究通过分析社交媒体大数据,检验了恐惧和集体主义对公众 COVID-19 预防意愿的综合影响。
从中国大陆 31 个省的 108914 名活跃用户的新浪微博中下载了微博帖子。数据是从 2020 年 1 月 11 日到 2 月 21 日检索到的。之后,我们对下载帖子的内容进行了省级分析。应用三个词汇表自动识别 31 个省份的恐惧、集体主义和预防意愿得分。然后,建立了一个多元回归模型来检验恐惧和集体主义对公众 COVID-19 预防意愿的综合影响。采用简单斜率检验和 Johnson-Neyman 技术检验恐惧和集体主义对预防意愿的交互作用。
研究表明:(a)恐惧和集体主义都可以积极预测人们的预防意愿;(b)恐惧和集体主义对人们的预防意愿存在交互作用,即恐惧和集体主义相互削弱对方对人们预防意愿的积极影响。
对人们预防意愿的恐惧促进作用可能是有限的和有条件的,集体主义价值观可以很好地弥补恐惧对预防意愿的促进作用。这些结果为如何有效提高公众对 COVID-19 的预防意愿提供了科学启示。