Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体后凸成形术中计划性或中央入路穿刺联合二次穿刺治疗大裂隙骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。

Creation of a planned or central-clefted puncture combined with a second puncture during vertebroplasty to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with large clefts.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics (Spine Surgery), The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Yuhuan County People's Hospital, Taizhou, 317600, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 16;15(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02048-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cemented vertebrae frequently re-fracture after vertebroplasty to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with large clefts. We compared the efficacy of planned and central-clefted puncture, both followed by a second puncture, as treatments for OVCFs with large clefts.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 38 patients. 18 of whom underwent planned puncture (group A) and 20 central-clefted puncture (group B). A second puncture was performed when the initially injected cement was restricted to the cleft. We recorded a visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, vertebral kyphotic angles (KAs), and compression ratios (CRs) preoperatively and at 2 days and 6 months postoperatively. We recorded the cement dispersion patterns and complications.

RESULTS

Second punctures succeeded in 15/18 and 7/20 patients of groups A and B, respectively. At 2 days postoperatively, the VAS score, KA, and CR were significantly better than the preoperative values (P < 0.01); no significant difference was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, all scores were poorer than at 2 days postoperatively (all P < 0.05), significantly more so in group B than group A (P < 0.05). Significant differences in terms of the cement dispersion patterns, and the cemented vertebral re-fracture and cement leakage rates, were observed between the two groups (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The two-puncture techniques were initially effective when treating large-clefted OVCFs. However, compared to the central-clefted puncture, the planned puncture improved the success rate of the second puncture, allowed better cement dispersion, and reduced the incidence of vertebral re-fracture during follow-up.

摘要

背景

在治疗伴有大裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)时,骨水泥椎体强化术后椎体常再次骨折。我们比较了计划穿刺和中央裂隙穿刺两种方法的疗效,两种方法均在初次穿刺后进行第二次穿刺。

方法

回顾性研究了 38 例患者。其中 18 例行计划穿刺(A 组),20 例行中央裂隙穿刺(B 组)。当最初注入的骨水泥仅限于裂隙时,进行第二次穿刺。记录术前、术后 2 天和 6 个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、椎体后凸角(KA)和压缩比(CR)。记录骨水泥弥散模式和并发症。

结果

A 组和 B 组分别有 15/18 和 7/20 例患者成功进行了第二次穿刺。术后 2 天,VAS 评分、KA 和 CR 均明显优于术前(P<0.01);两组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。6 个月随访时,所有评分均较术后 2 天差(均 P<0.05),B 组明显差于 A 组(P<0.05)。两组骨水泥弥散模式、骨水泥椎体再骨折和骨水泥渗漏率差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。

结论

两种穿刺技术治疗大裂隙 OVCF 初始疗效确切。与中央裂隙穿刺相比,计划穿刺可提高第二次穿刺成功率,使骨水泥弥散更好,降低随访期间椎体再骨折发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69d5/7667808/8d41f2e179f7/13018_2020_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验