Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Nurs Meas. 2020 Dec 1;28(3):E253-E292. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00045. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate parental monitoring instruments and the theoretical perspectives informing their development.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, seven databases were searched for original studies using a monitoring instrument. The psychometric properties of each identified instrument were assessed using the "COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments" (COSMIN) methodology.
Of 2,245 articles identified, 72 studies representing six parental monitoring instruments met inclusion criteria. Quality of reporting on psychometric properties varied widely across instruments with only three including content validation studies.
Findings of this review reveal inattention to the psychometric quality of child self-reported monitoring instruments. Future research must focus on the psychometric quality of instruments used to measure the parent-child relationship.
本系统评价旨在评估父母监督工具及其发展的理论视角。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,使用监测工具在七个数据库中搜索原始研究。使用“健康状况测量工具选择的共识标准”(COSMIN)方法评估每个确定工具的心理测量特性。
在确定的 2245 篇文章中,有 72 项研究代表了六种父母监督工具,符合纳入标准。仪器心理测量特性报告的质量在仪器之间差异很大,只有三个包括内容验证研究。
本研究结果表明,对儿童自我报告的监测工具的心理测量质量关注不够。未来的研究必须集中在用于测量亲子关系的工具的心理测量质量上。