Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee.
Health Psychol. 2023 Dec;42(12):913-923. doi: 10.1037/hea0001245. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Many studies have shown that parental knowledge/monitoring is correlated with adolescent substance use, but the association may be confounded by the many preexisting differences between families with low versus high monitoring. We attempted to produce more rigorous evidence for a causal relation using a longitudinal design that took advantage of within-family fluctuations in knowledge/monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Youth ( = 8,780, age range = 10.5-15.6 years) at 21 sites across the United States completed up to seven surveys over 12 months. Youth reported on their parents' knowledge/monitoring of their activities and their substance use in the past month. Regressions were fit to within-family changes in youth-perceived knowledge/monitoring and substance use between survey waves. By analyzing within-family changes over time, we controlled for all stable, a priori differences that exist between families with low versus high levels of youth-perceived knowledge/monitoring.
Youth initially denying substance use were significantly more likely to start reporting use when they experienced a decrease in the level of perceived knowledge/monitoring (relative risk [RR] = 1.18, < .001). Youth initially endorsing substance use were significantly more likely to stop reporting use when they experienced an increase in the level of perceived knowledge/monitoring (RR = 1.06; < .001). Associations were similar or larger when adjusting for several time-varying potential confounders.
In a large, sociodemographically diverse sample, within-family changes in youth-perceived parental knowledge/monitoring over time were robustly associated with changes in youths' engagement in substance use. Findings lend support to the hypothesis that parent knowledge/monitoring is causally related to substance involvement in early adolescence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
许多研究表明,父母的知识/监督与青少年物质使用有关,但这种关联可能受到家庭间存在的许多预先存在的差异的影响,这些差异存在于低监督和高监督家庭之间。我们试图利用新冠疫情期间家庭内部知识/监督波动的纵向设计,为因果关系提供更严格的证据。
全美 21 个地点的 8780 名青年(年龄范围为 10.5-15.6 岁)在 12 个月内完成了多达 7 次调查。青年报告了他们父母对他们活动的知识/监督以及他们过去一个月的物质使用情况。回归模型适用于调查波之间青少年感知的知识/监督和物质使用的家庭内变化。通过分析随时间的家庭内变化,我们控制了所有预先存在的稳定差异,这些差异存在于感知知识/监督水平低和高的家庭之间。
最初否认物质使用的青年,当他们感知到的知识/监督水平下降时,更有可能开始报告使用物质(相对风险 [RR] = 1.18,<0.001)。最初认可物质使用的青年,当他们感知到的知识/监督水平增加时,更有可能停止报告使用物质(RR = 1.06;<0.001)。当调整几个随时间变化的潜在混杂因素时,关联仍然相似或更大。
在一个大型的、社会人口统计学上多样化的样本中,随着时间的推移,青少年感知到的父母知识/监督的家庭内变化与青少年参与物质使用的变化密切相关。这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即父母的知识/监督与青少年早期物质参与存在因果关系。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。