Suppr超能文献

地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗中度至重度新冠肺炎疗效的比较

Comparison of efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

作者信息

Fatima Syeda Arzinda, Asif Mohsin, Khan Khurshid A, Siddique Nasir, Khan Aijaz Zeeshan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Resident Internal Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec;60:413-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The first case of Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were diagnosed in Wuhan, China in 2019. In the first half of 2020 this disease has already converted into a global pandemic. Various treatment options were being tried all over the world. Some studies showed beneficial effects of corticosteroids in covid 19. Hence, we designed this study to compare the effect of two steroids in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

STUDY SETTINGS

Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore and Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore.

STUDY DESIGN

Quasi experimental, interventional study.

DURATION OF STUDY

From 1st June 2020 to 30th June 2020.

METHODOLOGY

: there were total 100 patients; 35 patients received dexamethasone and 65 were kept in methylprednisolone receiving group.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 57.91 years in dexamethasone group and 54.86 years in methylprednisolone group. In dexamethasone group, there were 15 (42.8%) critically ill patients who were shifted to Intensive care unit (ICU) and seven (20%) of them needed ventilatory support, whereas in methylprednisolone group 22 (33.8%) had to be admitted in ICU with eight (12.3%) patient needing ventilator. As outcome measure, patients in both the groups showed marked improvement in temperature, oxygen requirement and C-reactive protein (CRP) on day 5. Only six (17.1%) patient died who received dexamethasone while 10 (15.3%) patients died among those receiving methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone and methylprednisolone both are equally effective in treating moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

摘要

背景

2019年,中国武汉诊断出首例严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染病例。2020年上半年,这种疾病已演变成全球大流行。世界各地都在尝试各种治疗方案。一些研究显示皮质类固醇对新冠19有有益效果。因此,我们设计了这项研究来比较两种类固醇在中重度新冠19疾病中的效果。

目的

比较地塞米松和甲泼尼龙在中重度新冠19疾病中的疗效和安全性。

研究地点

拉合尔的法蒂玛纪念医院和拉合尔的甘加拉姆医院。

研究设计

准实验性干预研究。

研究时长

从2020年6月1日至2020年6月30日。

方法

共有100名患者;35名患者接受地塞米松治疗,65名患者被纳入接受甲泼尼龙治疗的组。

结果

地塞米松组患者的平均年龄为57.91岁,甲泼尼龙组为54.86岁。在地塞米松组,有15名(42.8%)重症患者被转至重症监护病房(ICU),其中7名(20%)需要通气支持,而在甲泼尼龙组,22名(33.8%)患者不得不入住ICU,8名(12.3%)患者需要呼吸机。作为结果指标,两组患者在第5天时体温、氧气需求和C反应蛋白(CRP)均有明显改善。接受地塞米松治疗的患者中仅有6名(17.1%)死亡,而接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者中有10名(15.3%)死亡。

结论

地塞米松和甲泼尼龙在治疗中重度新冠19疾病方面同样有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
C-Reactive Protein Level May Predict the Risk of COVID-19 Aggravation.C反应蛋白水平可能预测新冠病毒疾病加重风险。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;7(5):ofaa153. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa153. eCollection 2020 May.
7
Steroids for sepsis: yes, no or maybe.用于脓毒症的类固醇:是、否还是也许。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 9):S1070-S1073. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.35.
9
Update on procalcitonin measurements.降钙素原检测的最新进展。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jul;34(4):263-73. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.4.263. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Pulmonary diseases and corticosteroids.肺部疾病与皮质类固醇
Indian J Pediatr. 2008 Oct;75(10):1045-56. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0209-0. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验