• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗中度至重度新冠肺炎疗效的比较
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec;60:413-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Comparison between methylprednisolone infusion and dexamethasone in COVID-19 ARDS mechanically ventilated patients.甲基强的松龙输注与地塞米松在新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者中的比较。
Egypt J Intern Med. 2022;34(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s43162-022-00113-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
3
A Comparison of the Efficacy of Adjuvant Parenteral Methylprednisolone and Dexamethasone in Reducing Covid-19 Disease Severity and Mortality among the Moderate to Critical Patients -A Retrospective Study.辅助性肌内注射甲泼尼龙和地塞米松治疗中重度至危重症 COVID-19 患者的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Apr;70(4):11-12.
4
"Tocilizumab-an option for patients with COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience", a retrospective study-original article.《托珠单抗——新冠病毒肺炎相关细胞因子释放综合征患者的一种选择:单中心经验》,一项回顾性研究——原创文章
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar;63:102165. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Dexamethasone or methylprednisolone therapy in covid-19 pneumonia: A retrospective and comparative study of 513 cases.地塞米松或甲泼尼龙治疗新冠肺炎肺炎:513例回顾性比较研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct;70:102858. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102858. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Among COVID-19 Patients.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙对改善新型冠状病毒肺炎患者氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)疗效的比较
Cureus. 2020 Oct 12;12(10):e10918. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10918.
7
A Comparison of Methylprednisolone and Dexamethasone in Intensive Care Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19 重症监护患者中甲基强的松龙与地塞米松的比较。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/0885066621994057. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Evaluation of the use of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in asthma critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study.评价 COVID-19 重症哮喘患者使用甲泼尼龙和地塞米松的情况:一项多中心队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02603-4.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
10
Comparative Efficacy of High-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Methylprednisolone in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.高剂量地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较
Cureus. 2024 Mar 7;16(3):e55725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55725. eCollection 2024 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Methylprednisolone pulse therapy compared with intravenous dexamethasone for severe COVID-19 patients: a randomized clinical trial.甲泼尼龙冲击疗法与静脉注射地塞米松治疗重症 COVID-19 患者的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Virol J. 2025 Aug 6;22(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02906-4.
2
Effects of colchicine, interferon β, IVIG, tocilizumab and corticosteroids on COVID-19 patient survival from all presently available published clinical trials: A narrative review.秋水仙碱、干扰素β、静脉注射免疫球蛋白、托珠单抗和皮质类固醇对COVID-19患者生存的影响:基于所有现有已发表临床试验的叙述性综述。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2025 Mar 11;16(2):198-214. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.2.198. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Inhaled and Intravenous Corticosteroids in Managing COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.吸入性和静脉注射皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Jul 18;16(7):952. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070952.
4
Evaluation of the use of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone in asthma critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study.评价 COVID-19 重症哮喘患者使用甲泼尼龙和地塞米松的情况:一项多中心队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02603-4.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoids treatment in severe COVID-19: methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone.糖皮质激素治疗重症 COVID-19 的系统评价和荟萃分析:甲泼尼龙与地塞米松。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 May 5;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08280-2.
6
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Meta-Analysis.低剂量与高剂量地塞米松治疗住院COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Jan 17;15(1):e33884. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33884. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone dexamethasone in critically ill patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study.甲泼尼龙与地塞米松对新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征危重症患者的安全性及有效性:一项回顾性研究
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 15;10:20499361231153546. doi: 10.1177/20499361231153546. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Comparison of the efficacy of equivalent doses of dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, and hydrocortisone for treatment of COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective three-arm randomized clinical trial.比较等效剂量地塞米松、甲泼尼龙和氢化可的松治疗 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项前瞻性三臂随机临床试验。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2023 Apr;173(5-6):140-151. doi: 10.1007/s10354-022-00993-4. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
Corticosteroids use for COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviews.用于治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的皮质类固醇:系统评价概述
Infez Med. 2022 Dec 1;30(4):469-479. doi: 10.53854/liim-3004-1. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical effect of early administration of tocilizumab following the initiation of corticosteroid therapy for patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 患者在开始皮质类固醇治疗后早期给予托珠单抗治疗的临床效果。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Dec;28(12):1639-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
C-Reactive Protein Level May Predict the Risk of COVID-19 Aggravation.C反应蛋白水平可能预测新冠病毒疾病加重风险。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 29;7(5):ofaa153. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa153. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Early Short-Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19 住院患者的早期短程皮质类固醇治疗。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2114-2120. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa601.
3
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in COVID-19 based on evidence for COVID-19, other coronavirus infections, influenza, community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于 COVID-19、其他冠状病毒感染、流感、社区获得性肺炎和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的证据评估 COVID-19 中皮质类固醇的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2020 Jul 6;192(27):E756-E767. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200645. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
RECOVERY trial: the UK covid-19 study resetting expectations for clinical trials.康复试验:英国新冠病毒研究重新设定了对临床试验的期望。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m1626. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1626.
5
A retrospective cohort study of methylprednisolone therapy in severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.一项关于甲泼尼龙治疗COVID-19重症肺炎患者的回顾性队列研究。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020 Apr 28;5(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0158-2.
6
The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China.抗炎药物在治疗重症新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者中的应用:来自中国临床免疫学家的观点。
Clin Immunol. 2020 May;214:108393. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108393. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Steroids for sepsis: yes, no or maybe.用于脓毒症的类固醇:是、否还是也许。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Apr;10(Suppl 9):S1070-S1073. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.35.
8
Steroid hyperglycemia: Prevalence, early detection and therapeutic recommendations: A narrative review.类固醇性高血糖症:患病率、早期检测及治疗建议:一篇叙述性综述
World J Diabetes. 2015 Jul 25;6(8):1073-81. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i8.1073.
9
Update on procalcitonin measurements.降钙素原检测的最新进展。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 Jul;34(4):263-73. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.4.263. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Pulmonary diseases and corticosteroids.肺部疾病与皮质类固醇
Indian J Pediatr. 2008 Oct;75(10):1045-56. doi: 10.1007/s12098-008-0209-0. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗中度至重度新冠肺炎疗效的比较

Comparison of efficacy of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

作者信息

Fatima Syeda Arzinda, Asif Mohsin, Khan Khurshid A, Siddique Nasir, Khan Aijaz Zeeshan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Resident Internal Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec;60:413-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.027
PMID:33200031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7654232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The first case of Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were diagnosed in Wuhan, China in 2019. In the first half of 2020 this disease has already converted into a global pandemic. Various treatment options were being tried all over the world. Some studies showed beneficial effects of corticosteroids in covid 19. Hence, we designed this study to compare the effect of two steroids in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

STUDY SETTINGS

Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore and Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore.

STUDY DESIGN

Quasi experimental, interventional study.

DURATION OF STUDY

From 1st June 2020 to 30th June 2020.

METHODOLOGY

: there were total 100 patients; 35 patients received dexamethasone and 65 were kept in methylprednisolone receiving group.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 57.91 years in dexamethasone group and 54.86 years in methylprednisolone group. In dexamethasone group, there were 15 (42.8%) critically ill patients who were shifted to Intensive care unit (ICU) and seven (20%) of them needed ventilatory support, whereas in methylprednisolone group 22 (33.8%) had to be admitted in ICU with eight (12.3%) patient needing ventilator. As outcome measure, patients in both the groups showed marked improvement in temperature, oxygen requirement and C-reactive protein (CRP) on day 5. Only six (17.1%) patient died who received dexamethasone while 10 (15.3%) patients died among those receiving methylprednisolone.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone and methylprednisolone both are equally effective in treating moderate to severe covid 19 disease.

摘要

背景

2019年,中国武汉诊断出首例严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染病例。2020年上半年,这种疾病已演变成全球大流行。世界各地都在尝试各种治疗方案。一些研究显示皮质类固醇对新冠19有有益效果。因此,我们设计了这项研究来比较两种类固醇在中重度新冠19疾病中的效果。

目的

比较地塞米松和甲泼尼龙在中重度新冠19疾病中的疗效和安全性。

研究地点

拉合尔的法蒂玛纪念医院和拉合尔的甘加拉姆医院。

研究设计

准实验性干预研究。

研究时长

从2020年6月1日至2020年6月30日。

方法

共有100名患者;35名患者接受地塞米松治疗,65名患者被纳入接受甲泼尼龙治疗的组。

结果

地塞米松组患者的平均年龄为57.91岁,甲泼尼龙组为54.86岁。在地塞米松组,有15名(42.8%)重症患者被转至重症监护病房(ICU),其中7名(20%)需要通气支持,而在甲泼尼龙组,22名(33.8%)患者不得不入住ICU,8名(12.3%)患者需要呼吸机。作为结果指标,两组患者在第5天时体温、氧气需求和C反应蛋白(CRP)均有明显改善。接受地塞米松治疗的患者中仅有6名(17.1%)死亡,而接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者中有10名(15.3%)死亡。

结论

地塞米松和甲泼尼龙在治疗中重度新冠19疾病方面同样有效。