Suppr超能文献

主观暴食:饮食障碍和更广泛心理困扰的标志。

Subjective binge eating: a marker of disordered eating and broader psychological distress.

机构信息

Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Denver, Morgridge College of Education, 1999 East Evans Avenue, Denver, CO, 80210, USA.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#3270-Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Oct;26(7):2201-2209. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01053-9. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is building, but limited evidence to suggest that subjective binge eating (SBE) is clinically concerning. The current study examined associated features of SBEs including disordered eating, body shame, negative affect, and interpersonal problems, as well as how SBE occurrence relates to other daily eating experiences.

METHODS

Participants were 400 individuals recruited via internet snowball or Amazon Mechanical Turk, including 132 with at least one SBE [with or without objective binge eating episodes (OBEs)] in the prior 3 months, 135 with at least one OBE (and no SBEs) in the prior 3 months, and 133 with no loss of control eating in the prior 3 months nor a likely lifetime history of anorexia nervosa. Participants responded to questionnaires assessing eating disorder behaviors (i.e., frequency of compensatory behaviors, dietary restriction), body shame, negative affect (depressive/anxiety symptoms), interpersonal difficulties, and perception of daily eating experiences.

RESULTS

Individuals with SBEs had higher numbers of vomiting, laxative misuse and hard exercise episodes, dietary restriction, body shame, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and negative perceptions of daily eating experiences as compared to those with only OBEs and no loss of control eating.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that SBEs (whether on their own or combined with OBEs) are more related to disordered eating symptoms, body image concerns, depressive/anxiety symptoms, and general eating distress than OBEs on their own, suggesting that clinicians may view SBEs as markers of concern across domains.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, well-designed group-comparison regression analysis.

摘要

目的

有研究表明,主观暴食(SBE)虽有增加,但目前的证据仍有限,不足以表明其具有临床意义。本研究旨在探讨 SBE 与其他相关特征的联系,包括饮食失调、身体羞耻感、负面情绪和人际问题,以及 SBE 的发生与其他日常进食体验的关系。

方法

本研究通过互联网雪球或亚马逊土耳其机器人招募了 400 名参与者,其中包括 132 名在过去 3 个月内至少有一次 SBE(包括或不包括客观暴食发作 OBEs),135 名在过去 3 个月内至少有一次 OBE(且无 SBE),133 名在过去 3 个月内无失控性进食,且无厌食症的可能终生病史。参与者需要回答有关饮食失调行为(即补偿行为、饮食限制的频率)、身体羞耻感、负面情绪(抑郁/焦虑症状)、人际困难和对日常饮食体验的感知的问卷。

结果

与仅有 OBE 且无失控性进食的参与者相比,有 SBE 的参与者呕吐、滥用泻药和剧烈运动的次数更多,饮食限制、身体羞耻感、抑郁和焦虑症状以及对日常饮食体验的负面看法更严重。

结论

这些结果表明,与仅发生 OBE 或无失控性进食的个体相比,SBE(无论单独发生还是与 OBE 同时发生)与饮食失调症状、身体形象问题、抑郁/焦虑症状以及整体进食困扰的相关性更高,这表明临床医生可能会将 SBE 视为多个领域的关注指标。

证据等级

III,精心设计的组间比较回归分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验