Mulders-Jones Brittany, Mitchison Deborah, Girosi Federico, Hay Phillipa
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0170603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170603. eCollection 2017.
Recent research has challenged the stereotype that eating disorders are largely limited to young, White, upper-class females. This study investigated the association between indicators of socioeconomic status and eating disorder features.
Data were merged from cross-sectional general population surveys of adults in South Australia in 2008 (n = 3034) and 2009 (n = 3007) to give a total sample of 6041 participants. Multivariate logistic regressions were employed to test associations between indicators of socioeconomic status (household income, educational level, employment status, indigenous status and urbanicity) and current eating disorder features (objective binge eating, subjective binge eating, purging, strict dieting and overvaluation of weight/shape). Eating disorder features occurred at similar rates across all levels of income, education, indigenous status, and urbanicity (p > 0.05). However, compared to working full-time, not working due to disability was associated with an increased risk of objective binge eating (odds ratio (OR) = 2.30, p < 0.01) and purging (OR = 4.13, p < 0.05), engagement in home-duties with an increased risk of overvaluation of weight/shape (OR = 1.39, p < 0.05), and unemployment with an increased risk of objective binge eating (OR = 2.02, p < 0.05) and subjective binge eating (OR = 2.80, p < 0.05). Furthermore, participants with a trade or certificate qualification were at a significantly increased risk of reporting strict dieting compared to participants without a tertiary qualification (OR = 1.58, p <0.01). Limitations included the small numbers of indigenous participants (n = 115) and participants who reported purging (n = 54), exclusion of excessive exercise (which is associated with eating disorders, particularly in males), and the conduct of interviews by laypersons.
Overall, symptoms of eating disorders are distributed equally across levels of socioeconomic status. This study highlights the need for universal access to specialised services, to train healthcare workers in the detection and diagnosis of eating disorders in diverse subgroups, and to combat barriers to help-seeking experienced by people who do not conform to the demographic stereotype of an eating disorder. The increased prevalence of various eating disorder features in those who are not working could be addressed by providing support to help sufferers join the workforce, or engage in meaningful social or community activities to improve resilience against the development of eating disorders.
近期研究对饮食失调主要局限于年轻、白人、上层阶级女性这一刻板印象提出了挑战。本研究调查了社会经济地位指标与饮食失调特征之间的关联。
数据来自2008年(n = 3034)和2009年(n = 3007)南澳大利亚成年人横断面一般人群调查的合并数据,总样本量为6041名参与者。采用多变量逻辑回归来检验社会经济地位指标(家庭收入、教育水平、就业状况、原住民身份和城市化程度)与当前饮食失调特征(客观暴饮暴食、主观暴饮暴食、清除行为、严格节食以及对体重/体型的过度重视)之间的关联。饮食失调特征在所有收入、教育、原住民身份和城市化程度水平上的发生率相似(p > 0.05)。然而,与全职工作相比,因残疾而未工作与客观暴饮暴食风险增加(优势比(OR)= 2.30,p < 0.01)和清除行为风险增加(OR = 4.13,p < 0.05)相关,从事家务劳动与对体重/体型过度重视风险增加(OR = 1.39,p < 0.05)相关,失业与客观暴饮暴食风险增加(OR = 2.02,p < 0.05)和主观暴饮暴食风险增加(OR = 2.80,p < 0.05)相关。此外,与没有高等学历的参与者相比,具有行业或证书资格的参与者报告严格节食的风险显著增加(OR = 1.58,p <0.01)。局限性包括原住民参与者数量较少(n = 115)以及报告有清除行为的参与者数量较少(n = 54),排除了过度运动(这与饮食失调相关,尤其是在男性中),以及由非专业人员进行访谈。
总体而言,饮食失调症状在社会经济地位各水平上分布均匀。本研究强调需要普遍提供专业服务,培训医护人员对不同亚组饮食失调的检测和诊断能力,并消除不符合饮食失调人口统计学刻板印象的人群在寻求帮助时所面临的障碍。对于未工作人群中各种饮食失调特征患病率增加的问题,可以通过提供支持来帮助患者加入劳动力队伍,或参与有意义的社会或社区活动以提高抵御饮食失调发展的能力来解决。