• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后面对面与电话式扩展格拉斯哥结局评分测试比较。

Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Bossers, Schwarte, Verheul, and Schober); and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (Drs van der Naalt and Jacobs).

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E134-E138. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622.

DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622
PMID:33201032
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) is used for objective assessment of functional outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). In situations where face-to-face contact is not feasible, telephonic assessment of the GOS-E might be desirable. The aim of this study is to assess the level of agreement between face-to-face and telephonic assessment of the GOS-E.

SETTING

Multicenter study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. Inclusion was performed in the outpatient clinic (face-to-face assessment, by experienced neurologist), followed by assessment via telephone of the GOS-E after ±2 weeks (by trained researcher).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ±6 months after TBI.

DESIGN

Prospective validation study.

MAIN MEASURES

Interrater agreement of the GOS-E was assessed with Cohen's weighted κ.

RESULTS

From May 2014 until March 2018, 50 patients were enrolled; 54% were male (mean age 49.1 years). Median time between trauma and in-person GOS-E examination was 158 days and median time between face-to-face and telephonic GOS-E was 15 days. The quadratic weighted κ was 0.79. Sensitivity analysis revealed a quadratic weighted κ of 0.77, 0.78, and 0.70 for moderate-severe, complicated mild, and uncomplicated mild TBI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

No disagreements of more than 1 point on the GOS-E were observed, with the κ value representing good or substantial agreement. Assessment of the GOS-E via telephone is a valid alternative to the face-to-face interview when in-person contact is not feasible.

摘要

目的

扩展格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS-E)用于对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的功能结局进行客观评估。在无法进行面对面接触的情况下,可能希望通过电话评估 GOS-E。本研究的目的是评估面对面和电话评估 GOS-E 的一致性水平。

地点

2 家荷兰大学医学中心的多中心研究。在门诊进行纳入(面对面评估,由经验丰富的神经科医生进行),然后在±2 周后通过电话对 GOS-E 进行评估(由受过培训的研究人员进行)。

参与者

TBI 后±6 个月的患者。

设计

前瞻性验证研究。

主要措施

采用 Cohen 的加权κ评估 GOS-E 的评分者间一致性。

结果

从 2014 年 5 月至 2018 年 3 月,共纳入 50 例患者;54%为男性(平均年龄 49.1 岁)。创伤与现场 GOS-E 检查之间的中位数时间为 158 天,面对面与电话 GOS-E 之间的中位数时间为 15 天。二次加权κ为 0.79。敏感性分析显示,中度重度、复杂轻度和单纯轻度 TBI 的二次加权κ分别为 0.77、0.78 和 0.70。

结论

在 GOS-E 上没有观察到超过 1 分的分歧,κ 值表示良好或实质性一致。当无法进行面对面接触时,通过电话评估 GOS-E 是一种有效的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后面对面与电话式扩展格拉斯哥结局评分测试比较。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E134-E138. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622.
2
Longitudinal description of the glasgow outcome scale-extended for individuals in the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems study.创伤性脑损伤模型系统国家数据库中个体的格拉斯哥结局量表扩展的纵向描述:国家残疾研究所和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2486-2493. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
3
Outcomes in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Without Acute Intracranial Traumatic Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤但无脑内急性创伤性损伤患者的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2223245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23245.
4
Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews.通过面对面和电话结构化访谈得出的格拉斯哥预后量表评分的可靠性。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):252-8. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200305000-00003.
5
Reliability of a telephone-based Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment using a structured interview in a heterogenous population of patients and examiners.在患者和检查者构成各异的人群中,采用结构化访谈通过电话进行格拉斯哥预后量表评估的可靠性。
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Sep;24(9):1437-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0293.
6
The Association of Trauma Center Transport and Long-term Functional Outcomes in Head-injured Older Adults Transported by Emergency Medical Services.创伤中心转运与老年头部创伤患者长期功能结局的相关性:一项基于急救医疗服务转运的研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;27(3):207-216. doi: 10.1111/acem.13915. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Effects of hospital-acquired pneumonia on long-term recovery and hospital resource utilization following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.医院获得性肺炎对中重度颅脑损伤后长期康复和医院资源利用的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Apr;88(4):491-500. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002562.
8
Questionnaires vs Interviews for the Assessment of Global Functional Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.问卷与访谈在评估创伤性脑损伤后整体功能结局中的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34121.
9
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau-Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers.比较血浆磷酸化tau蛋白、总tau蛋白以及磷酸化tau蛋白与总tau蛋白比值作为急性和慢性创伤性脑损伤生物标志物的情况。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):1063-1072. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655.

引用本文的文献

1
Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Brain Injury: The TRAIN Randomized Clinical Trial.急性颅脑损伤患者的限制性与开放性输血策略:TRAiN 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Nov 19;332(19):1623-1633. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.20424.
2
Association of total bilirubin and prognosis in disorders of consciousness.总胆红素与意识障碍预后的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 29;14(1):20071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71124-9.
3
The efficacy and safety of bilateral synchronous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for prolonged disorders of consciousness: a multicenter, double-blind, stratified, randomized controlled trial protocol.
双侧同步经皮耳迷走神经刺激治疗长期意识障碍的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、双盲、分层、随机对照试验方案
Front Neurol. 2024 May 31;15:1418937. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1418937. eCollection 2024.
4
Association between prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide levels and mortality in patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury.院前呼气末二氧化碳水平与疑似严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 May;49(5):491-504. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07012-z. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
5
Study protocol: Developing telephone follow-up scale for patients with disorders of consciousness.研究方案:为意识障碍患者制定电话随访量表。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1071008. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1071008. eCollection 2023.
6
Profound prospective assessment of radiological and functional outcome 6 months after TBI in elderly.老年创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月的放射学和功能预后的深度前瞻性评估。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):849-864. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05546-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
Prognostic Role of Serum Soluble Tim-3 in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.血清可溶性Tim-3在重度创伤性脑损伤中的预后作用:一项前瞻性观察研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Jan 18;19:153-169. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S396771. eCollection 2023.
8
Clinical Value of TCCD for Evaluating the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Large Decompressive Craniectomy: A Retrospective Study.经大骨瓣减压术后重度创伤性脑损伤患者 TCCD 评估预后的临床价值:一项回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4556-4567. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02251-w. Epub 2022 Aug 7.