Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后面对面与电话式扩展格拉斯哥结局评分测试比较。

Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Bossers, Schwarte, Verheul, and Schober); and Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands (Drs van der Naalt and Jacobs).

出版信息

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E134-E138. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) is used for objective assessment of functional outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). In situations where face-to-face contact is not feasible, telephonic assessment of the GOS-E might be desirable. The aim of this study is to assess the level of agreement between face-to-face and telephonic assessment of the GOS-E.

SETTING

Multicenter study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. Inclusion was performed in the outpatient clinic (face-to-face assessment, by experienced neurologist), followed by assessment via telephone of the GOS-E after ±2 weeks (by trained researcher).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ±6 months after TBI.

DESIGN

Prospective validation study.

MAIN MEASURES

Interrater agreement of the GOS-E was assessed with Cohen's weighted κ.

RESULTS

From May 2014 until March 2018, 50 patients were enrolled; 54% were male (mean age 49.1 years). Median time between trauma and in-person GOS-E examination was 158 days and median time between face-to-face and telephonic GOS-E was 15 days. The quadratic weighted κ was 0.79. Sensitivity analysis revealed a quadratic weighted κ of 0.77, 0.78, and 0.70 for moderate-severe, complicated mild, and uncomplicated mild TBI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

No disagreements of more than 1 point on the GOS-E were observed, with the κ value representing good or substantial agreement. Assessment of the GOS-E via telephone is a valid alternative to the face-to-face interview when in-person contact is not feasible.

摘要

目的

扩展格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS-E)用于对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的功能结局进行客观评估。在无法进行面对面接触的情况下,可能希望通过电话评估 GOS-E。本研究的目的是评估面对面和电话评估 GOS-E 的一致性水平。

地点

2 家荷兰大学医学中心的多中心研究。在门诊进行纳入(面对面评估,由经验丰富的神经科医生进行),然后在±2 周后通过电话对 GOS-E 进行评估(由受过培训的研究人员进行)。

参与者

TBI 后±6 个月的患者。

设计

前瞻性验证研究。

主要措施

采用 Cohen 的加权κ评估 GOS-E 的评分者间一致性。

结果

从 2014 年 5 月至 2018 年 3 月,共纳入 50 例患者;54%为男性(平均年龄 49.1 岁)。创伤与现场 GOS-E 检查之间的中位数时间为 158 天,面对面与电话 GOS-E 之间的中位数时间为 15 天。二次加权κ为 0.79。敏感性分析显示,中度重度、复杂轻度和单纯轻度 TBI 的二次加权κ分别为 0.77、0.78 和 0.70。

结论

在 GOS-E 上没有观察到超过 1 分的分歧,κ 值表示良好或实质性一致。当无法进行面对面接触时,通过电话评估 GOS-E 是一种有效的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验