• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经大骨瓣减压术后重度创伤性脑损伤患者 TCCD 评估预后的临床价值:一项回顾性研究。

Clinical Value of TCCD for Evaluating the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Large Decompressive Craniectomy: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4556-4567. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02251-w. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-022-02251-w
PMID:35934765
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is challenging to assess the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) after large decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) for assessing the prognosis of sTBI patients 6 months after large DC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study that consecutively enrolled 84 patients with sTBI who were followed up for prognosis until 6 months after large DC. The primary endpoint was the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). According to the GOS, patients were divided into an unfavorable prognosis group (GOS 1-3, n = 47) and a favorable prognosis group (GOS 4-5, n = 37).

RESULTS

Significant between-group differences were found in age and hemodynamic parameters (systolic peak blood flow velocity, end-diastolic blood flow velocity, mean blood flow velocity, pulsatility index and resistance index) of the middle cerebral artery detected by TCCD (P < 0.05 for all). Subsequently, ridge regression was used to build a prognostic model for patients with large DC. Based on the cerebral hemodynamic parameters measured by TCCD and age, the mean (± standard deviation) area under the curve of the prognostic model in patients with sTBI after large DC was 0.76 ± 0.22. The sensitivity and specificity were 82.08% and 74.17%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cerebral hemodynamic parameters detected by TCCD, combined with age, may be used to predict the outcomes of patients with sTBI at 6 months after large DC. As a noninvasive method, TCCD has the potential to assess the prognosis of these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR: ChiCTR1800019758. Registered 27 November 2018-retrospectively registered ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ).

摘要

介绍

评估去骨瓣减压术后严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)患者的预后具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估经颅彩色双功能超声(TCCD)评估去骨瓣减压术后 6 个月 sTBI 患者预后的临床价值。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,连续纳入 84 例 sTBI 患者,在去骨瓣减压术后进行预后随访至 6 个月。主要终点是格拉斯哥结局评分(GOS)。根据 GOS,患者分为预后不良组(GOS 1-3,n=47)和预后良好组(GOS 4-5,n=37)。

结果

TCCD 检测到的大脑中动脉的年龄和血流动力学参数(收缩峰血流速度、舒张末期血流速度、平均血流速度、搏动指数和阻力指数)在两组间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。随后,脊回归用于构建去骨瓣减压术后患者的预后模型。基于 TCCD 测量的脑血流动力学参数和年龄,去骨瓣减压术后 sTBI 患者预后模型的曲线下面积的平均值(±标准差)为 0.76±0.22。灵敏度和特异性分别为 82.08%和 74.17%。

结论

TCCD 检测到的脑血流动力学参数,结合年龄,可能用于预测去骨瓣减压术后 6 个月 sTBI 患者的结局。作为一种非侵入性方法,TCCD 有可能评估这些患者的预后。

试验注册

ChiCTR:ChiCTR1800019758. 2018 年 11 月 27 日注册-回顾性注册(http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx)。

相似文献

1
Clinical Value of TCCD for Evaluating the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Large Decompressive Craniectomy: A Retrospective Study.经大骨瓣减压术后重度创伤性脑损伤患者 TCCD 评估预后的临床价值:一项回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4556-4567. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02251-w. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
2
Sequential changes in Rotterdam CT scores related to outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury who undergo decompressive craniectomy.接受减压性颅骨切除术的创伤性脑损伤患者的鹿特丹CT评分与预后相关的序贯变化。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;124(6):1640-5. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142760. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Cranioplasty and Hydrocephalus on Outcome.创伤性脑损伤的减压性颅骨切除术:颅骨修补术和脑积水对预后的作用
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e543-e549. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
Prognostic Analysis of Emergency Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with Bilateral Fixed Dilated Pupils.双侧固定性散大瞳孔的重型颅脑损伤患者行急诊去骨瓣减压术的预后分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e1307-e1317. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.162. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Decompressive Craniectomy.经颅多普勒超声在去骨瓣减压术后严重创伤性脑损伤管理中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e116-e124. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
6
Long-Term Pediatric Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后去骨瓣减压术的长期儿科结局。
P R Health Sci J. 2023 Jun;42(2):152-157.
7
Prognostic significance of abnormal hematological parameters in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.需要去骨瓣减压术的严重创伤性脑损伤患者血液学参数异常的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(2):545-551. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182293. Print 2020 Feb 1.
8
Quantitative cerebral blood flow using xenon-enhanced CT after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后应用氙增强 CT 进行定量脑血流检测。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;129(1):241-246. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS163036. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
9
Prognostic Predictors of Early Outcomes and Discharge Status of Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者行去骨瓣减压术后早期结局和出院状态的预后预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e101-e108. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.246. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Effect of Decompressive Craniectomy with Stepwise Decompression of the Intracranial Compartment on Postoperative Neurologic Function, Hemodynamics, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Score of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.去骨瓣减压术联合分步减压对重型颅脑损伤患者术后神经功能、血流动力学和格拉斯哥结局评分的影响。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;84(6):536-541. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757933. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
TCD-Guided management in carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study.经颅多普勒超声引导下颈动脉内膜切除术的治疗管理:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 4;19(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03069-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后面对面与电话式扩展格拉斯哥结局评分测试比较。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E134-E138. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622.
2
Traumatic Brain Injury: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Medical Management.颅脑创伤:流行病学、病理生理学和医学管理概述。
Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):213-238. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.001.
3
A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).
成人脑氧和颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):919-929. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05900-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
How I use Transcranial Doppler.我如何使用经颅多普勒
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 23;23(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2700-6.
5
Brain ultrasonography: methodology, basic and advanced principles and clinical applications. A narrative review.脑超声检查:方法学、基础与高级原理及临床应用。一篇叙述性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jul;45(7):913-927. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05610-4. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Decompressive Craniectomy.经颅多普勒超声在去骨瓣减压术后严重创伤性脑损伤管理中的应用。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e116-e124. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
7
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:改善预防、临床护理和研究的综合方法。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Dec;16(12):987-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.《重型颅脑损伤管理指南(第四版)》
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
9
Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension.创伤性颅内高压减压性颅骨切除术试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1119-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605215. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
10
Transcranial Color-Coded Duplex Sonography: Another Option Besides the Blind Method.
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Mar;35(3):669-71. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.12022. Epub 2016 Feb 18.