• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月的放射学和功能预后的深度前瞻性评估。

Profound prospective assessment of radiological and functional outcome 6 months after TBI in elderly.

机构信息

Section, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.

Bicometrixicometrix, Louvain, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):849-864. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05546-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-023-05546-1
PMID:36922467
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults is usually affected by the presence of comorbidities, leading to more severe sequelae in this age group than in younger patients. However, there are only few reports that prospectively perform in-depth assessment of outcome following TBI in elderly.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims at documenting structural brain characteristics and functional outcome and quality of life in elderly patients 6 months after TBI and comparing these data with healthy volunteers undergoing the same assessments.

METHODS

Thirteen TBI patients ≥ 65 years old, admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), between 2019 and 2022 due to TBI, including all injury severities, and a group of 13 healthy volunteers with similar demographic characteristics were prospectively included in the study. At admission, demographic, injury, and CT scan data were collected in our database. Six months after the accident, a brain MRI scan and standardized assessments of frailty, sleep quality, cognitive function, motor function, and quality of life were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients and 13 volunteers were included in the study, with a median age of 74 and 73 years, respectively. Nine out of the 13 patients presented with a mild TBI. The patient group had a significantly higher level of frailty than the control group, presenting a mean Reported Edmonton Frailty Scale score of 5.8 (SD 2.7) vs 0.7 (SD 1.1) (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between patient and control brain volumes, fluid attenuated inversion recovery white matter hyperintensity volumes, number of lesions and blackholes, and fractional anisotropy values. Patients demonstrated a significantly higher median reaction time in the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (22.3 s vs 17.6, p = 0.03) and Reaction Time (0.5 s vs 0.4 s, p < 0.01) subtests in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Furthermore, patients had a lower mean score on the first Box and Blocks test with the right hand (46.6 vs 61.7, p < 0.01) and a significantly higher mean score in the Timed-Up & Go test (13.1 s vs 6.2 s, p = 0.02) and Timed Up & Go with cognitive dual task (16.0 s vs 10.2 s, p < 0.01). Substantially lower QOLIBRI total score (60.4 vs 85.4, p < 0.01) and QOLIBRI-OS total score (53.8 vs 88.5, p < 0.01) were also observed in the patients' group.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, TBI patients ≥ 65 years old when compared with elder controls showed slightly worse cognitive performance and poorer motor function, higher fall risk, but a substantially reduced QoL at 6 months FU, as well as significantly higher frailty, even when the TBI is classified as mild. No statistically significant differences were found in structural brain characteristics on MRI. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to refine the impact of TBI versus frailty on function and QoL in elderly.

摘要

背景

老年人创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 后的恢复通常受到合并症的影响,导致该年龄段的后遗症比年轻患者更严重。然而,只有少数研究前瞻性地评估了老年 TBI 后的结果。

目的

本研究旨在记录老年 TBI 患者 6 个月后的结构脑特征和功能结局以及生活质量,并将这些数据与接受相同评估的健康志愿者进行比较。

方法

2019 年至 2022 年期间,由于 TBI 而入住鲁汶大学医院(比利时)的 13 名年龄≥65 岁的 TBI 患者,包括所有损伤严重程度,以及 13 名具有相似人口统计学特征的健康志愿者被纳入前瞻性研究。入院时,在我们的数据库中收集了人口统计学、损伤和 CT 扫描数据。事故发生后 6 个月,进行了脑 MRI 扫描和衰弱、睡眠质量、认知功能、运动功能和生活质量的标准化评估。

结果

共有 13 名患者和 13 名志愿者纳入研究,患者的中位年龄为 74 岁,对照组的中位年龄为 73 岁。13 名患者中有 9 名患有轻度 TBI。患者组的衰弱程度明显高于对照组,报告的埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评分中位数为 5.8(SD 2.7)比 0.7(SD 1.1)(p<0.01)。患者和对照组的脑体积、液体衰减反转恢复白质高信号体积、病变和黑洞数量以及各向异性分数值之间无统计学显著差异。患者在剑桥认知测试自动化电池中的 One Touch Stockings of Cambridge(22.3s 比 17.6,p=0.03)和反应时间(0.5s 比 0.4s,p<0.01)亚测试中的中位反应时间明显更长。此外,患者右手第一 Box and Blocks 测试的平均得分较低(46.6 比 61.7,p<0.01),Timed-Up & Go 测试(13.1s 比 6.2s,p=0.02)和 Timed Up & Go with cognitive dual task(16.0s 比 10.2s,p<0.01)的平均得分明显更高。患者组的 QOLIBRI 总分(60.4 比 85.4,p<0.01)和 QOLIBRI-OS 总分(53.8 比 88.5,p<0.01)也明显较低。

结论

在这项前瞻性研究中,与老年对照组相比,年龄≥65 岁的 TBI 患者表现出稍差的认知表现和较差的运动功能、更高的跌倒风险,但在 6 个月随访时的生活质量明显降低,以及明显更高的衰弱程度,即使 TBI 被归类为轻度。在 MRI 上未发现结构脑特征的统计学显著差异。需要更大样本量的未来研究来细化 TBI 与衰弱对老年人功能和生活质量的影响。

相似文献

1
Profound prospective assessment of radiological and functional outcome 6 months after TBI in elderly.老年创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月的放射学和功能预后的深度前瞻性评估。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):849-864. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05546-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.比较脑损伤后的生活质量——总体量表和生活满意度量表作为创伤性脑损伤研究的结果测量指标。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3352-3363. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7546. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
Prospective evaluation of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) score: minor differences in patients with major versus no or mild traumatic brain injury at one-year follow up.前瞻性评估脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI)评分:在一年随访时,重度颅脑损伤患者与无或轻度颅脑损伤患者之间存在较小差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0966-z.
4
The effect of age on functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: 6-month report of a prospective multicenter trial.年龄对轻度创伤性脑损伤功能结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心试验的6个月报告。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000127767.83267.33.
5
One-year outcome following brain injury: a comparison of younger versus elderly major trauma patients.脑损伤后的一年结局:年轻与老年重度创伤患者的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2974-1. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Effect of frailty on 6-month outcome after traumatic brain injury: a multicentre cohort study with external validation.衰弱对创伤性脑损伤后 6 个月结局的影响:一项多中心队列研究及外部验证。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Feb;21(2):153-162. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00374-4.
7
Longitudinal Recovery Following Repetitive Traumatic Brain Injury.重复性创伤性脑损伤后的纵向恢复。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35804.
8
Quality of life up to 10 years after traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional analysis.创伤性脑损伤后长达 10 年的生活质量:一项横断面分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 4;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01391-3.
9
Traumatic hemorrhagic brain injury: impact of location and resorption on cognitive outcome.创伤性出血性脑损伤:部位和吸收对认知结局的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):796-804. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.JNS151781. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Can We Actually Predict Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury?我们真的能预测创伤性脑损伤患者的长期满意度吗?
J Surg Res. 2024 Sep;301:269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Hip Fracture on Geriatric Care and Mortality Among Older Swedes: Mapping Care Trajectories and Their Determinants.《髋部骨折对老年瑞典人的老年护理和死亡率的影响:描绘护理轨迹及其决定因素》
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 6;192(1):41-50. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac149.
2
Health care utilization and outcomes in older adults after Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI study.老年人创伤性脑损伤后医疗保健的利用和结果:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Injury. 2022 Aug;53(8):2774-2782. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Face-to-Face Versus Telephonic Extended Glasgow Outcome Score Testing After Traumatic Brain Injury.
创伤性脑损伤后面对面与电话式扩展格拉斯哥结局评分测试比较。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(3):E134-E138. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000622.
4
Sleep Disturbances Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: A Comparison Study.老年人创伤性脑损伤后的睡眠障碍:一项对比研究。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):288-295. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000563.
5
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in 2019-2020.2019 - 2020年的轻度创伤性脑损伤
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):177-178. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18134.
6
Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study.创伤性脑损伤患者的病例组合、护理路径和结局在 CENTER-TBI 中的研究:一项欧洲前瞻性、多中心、纵向、队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Oct;18(10):923-934. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30232-7.
7
Geriatric traumatic brain injury-What we know and what we don't.老年创伤性脑损伤——我们所知与未知的情况。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct;85(4):788-798. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001910.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Surgery for Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma in an Aging Population.创伤性急性硬脑膜下血肿手术治疗在老年人群中的比较效果。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 1;36(7):1184-1191. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5869. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
Traumatic brain injury history and progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease.创伤性脑损伤病史与从轻度认知障碍到阿尔茨海默病的进展。
Neuropsychology. 2018 May;32(4):401-409. doi: 10.1037/neu0000431.
10
Patients with Diffuse Axonal Injury Can Recover to a Favorable Long-Term Functional and Quality of Life Outcome.弥漫性轴索损伤患者可获得良好的长期功能和生活质量结局。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Oct 15;35(20):2357-2364. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5650. Epub 2018 Jul 2.