• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任手术决策量表的验证。

Validation of the Trust in the Surgical Decision Scale.

机构信息

Informed Medical Decisions Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.

Health Decisions Science Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):e796-e800. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004352. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004352
PMID:33201091
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a short measure of trust in the surgical decision making process.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Having a reliable and valid measure of trust is important to assess the quality of the patient-surgeon relationship when decisions about surgical procedures are made.

METHODS

A previously published 10-item trust scale was qualitatively tested with patients, and a revised set of 14 items was tested using a web-based survey of 300 people who had hip, knee or back surgery in the past 2 years. The 14 items were evaluated using patterns of correlations and relevance to medical decision making to create a 5-item version. A 5-item subset was compared to the 14-item version to assess reliability and validity of patient's trust in the surgical decision making process.

RESULTS

Of the 300 participants, 32% had hip surgery, 33% had knee surgery, and 34% back surgery. Mean age was 53 years, 45% female, 80% White, and 36% had a high school degree or less. The item intercorrelations for the 14 items were 0.43-0.72 and 0.58-0.71 for the 5 items. Correlation between the versions was 0.96 (P < 0.01). The 14- and 5-item versions were positively correlated with participants' shared decision making process scores (0.42 and 0.41, both P = 0.01), internal consistency reliability scores were 0.95 and 0.89, respectively, and were negatively correlated with their Decision Regret scores (-0.51 and -0.48, both P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 5-item Trust in the Surgical Decision Scale has strong evidence of validity and reliability for patients who underwent common orthopedic procedures.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种用于外科决策过程中信任的简短测量工具。

摘要背景数据

当做出手术程序决策时,拥有一种可靠且有效的信任测量方法对于评估医患关系的质量非常重要。

方法

先前发表的 10 项信任量表在患者中进行了定性测试,并使用过去 2 年内接受过髋、膝或背部手术的 300 人的基于网络的调查对 14 项修订后的量表进行了测试。通过相关性模式和对医疗决策的相关性评估,这 14 项量表被评估以创建一个 5 项版本。将 5 项量表与 14 项量表版本进行比较,以评估患者对手术决策过程的信任的可靠性和有效性。

结果

在 300 名参与者中,32%接受了髋部手术,33%接受了膝关节手术,34%接受了背部手术。平均年龄为 53 岁,45%为女性,80%为白人,36%具有高中或以下学历。14 项量表的项目相关性为 0.43-0.72,5 项量表的项目相关性为 0.58-0.71。两个版本之间的相关性为 0.96(P < 0.01)。14 项和 5 项版本与参与者的共同决策过程得分呈正相关(分别为 0.42 和 0.41,均 P = 0.01),内部一致性信度分数分别为 0.95 和 0.89,并且与他们的决策后悔分数呈负相关(分别为-0.51 和-0.48,均 P = 0.01)。

结论

对于接受常见骨科手术的患者,5 项信任手术决策量表具有很强的有效性和可靠性证据。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Trust in the Surgical Decision Scale.信任手术决策量表的验证。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):e796-e800. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004352. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Measuring shared decision-making in younger and older adults with depression.测量年轻和老年抑郁症患者的共同决策。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Oct 12;34(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac076.
3
Development and Evaluation of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: A Short Patient-Reported Measure.共享决策过程量表的制定与评估:一种简短的患者报告测量工具
Med Decis Making. 2021 Feb;41(2):108-119. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977878. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Reliability and Validity of a Perinatal Shared Decision-Making Measure: The Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation.围产期共享决策措施的信度和效度:分娩选择、信息和以人为中心的解释。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2022 Nov;51(6):631-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer-A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers.评估癌症死亡德国患者照顾者的决策后悔-照顾者决策后悔量表的心理测量学验证。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1089-1099. doi: 10.1111/hex.12941. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.匈牙利全国性调查中 9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale-the Trust in Oncologist Scale-short form (TiOS-SF).肿瘤学家信任量表简版——肿瘤学家信任量表简式(TiOS-SF)的开发与验证
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):855-861. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.信任护士量表:结构效度和内部信度评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):683-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x.
9
[Reliability and validity for Chinese version of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire].《9项共同决策问卷中文版的信效度研究》
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Jul 28;44(7):823-829. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.180316.
10
Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US.美国生物医学研究中少数族裔群体对研究可信度感知量表的编制与验证:旨在测量信任度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248812. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients Who Reviewed a Decision Aid Prior to Major Orthopaedic Surgery Reported Higher Trust in Their Surgeon.在进行重大骨科手术前查看了决策辅助工具的患者报告称,他们对自己的外科医生的信任度更高。
JB JS Open Access. 2022 Mar 24;7(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00149. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.