• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物竞赛中的情绪。

Emotion in animal contests.

机构信息

Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20201715. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1715. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2020.1715
PMID:33203327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7116454/
Abstract

Emotions encompass cognitive and behavioural responses to reward and punishment. Using contests as a case-study, we propose that short-term emotions underpin animals' assessments, decision-making and behaviour. Equating contest assessments to emotional 'appraisals', we describe how contestants appraise more than resource value and outcome probability. These appraisals elicit the cognition, drive and neurophysiology that governs aggressive behaviour. We discuss how recent contest outcomes induce long-term moods, which impact subsequent contest behaviour. Finally, we distinguish between integral (objectively relevant) and incidental (objectively irrelevant) emotions and moods (affective states). Unlike existing ecological models, our approach predicts that incidental events influence contest dynamics, and that contests become incidental influences themselves, potentially causing maladaptive decision-making. As affective states cross contexts, a more holistic ethology (incorporating emotions and moods) would illuminate animal cognition and behaviour.

摘要

情绪包括对奖励和惩罚的认知和行为反应。我们以竞赛为例,提出短期情绪是动物评估、决策和行为的基础。通过将竞赛评估等同于情感“评价”,我们描述了参赛者如何评价资源价值和结果概率之外的因素。这些评估引发了支配攻击性行为的认知、驱动力和神经生理学。我们讨论了最近的竞赛结果如何引起长期的情绪,从而影响后续的竞赛行为。最后,我们区分了整体(客观相关)和偶然(客观无关)的情绪和情绪(情感状态)。与现有的生态模型不同,我们的方法预测偶然事件会影响竞赛动态,而竞赛本身也会成为偶然的影响因素,可能导致适应不良的决策。随着情感状态跨越不同的情境,更全面的行为学(包括情感和情绪)将阐明动物的认知和行为。

相似文献

1
Emotion in animal contests.动物竞赛中的情绪。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 25;287(1939):20201715. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1715. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Winner-loser effects overrule aggressiveness during the early stages of contests between pigs.在猪之间竞争的早期阶段,胜负效应会压倒攻击性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69664-x.
3
Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.战斗经验对攻击性行为的调节:机制与竞争结果
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74. doi: 10.1017/S146479310500686X.
4
All by myself? Meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models.独自完成?动物竞赛的荟萃分析更支持自我评估模型而非相互评估模型。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Aug;94(4):1430-1442. doi: 10.1111/brv.12509. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies.经验对竞赛评估策略的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 3;7(1):14492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15144-8.
6
Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behaviour.动物个性作为竞争行为的原因和结果
Biol Lett. 2015 Mar;11(3). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.1007. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Age-dependent winner-loser effects in a mangrove rivulus fish, Kryptolebias marmoratus.年龄相关的赢家-输家效应在红树林鱵鱼,Kryptolebias marmoratus 中。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1477-1488. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01797-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
8
Subjective and objective components of resource value additively increase aggression in parasitoid contests.资源价值的主观和客观成分可累加增加寄生蜂竞争中的攻击性。
Biol Lett. 2013 May 22;9(4):20130391. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0391. Print 2013 Aug 23.
9
Contest experience and body size affect different types of contest decisions.竞赛经验和体型会影响不同类型的竞赛决策。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Nov;19(6):1183-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1028-8. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
10
Spatiotemporal dynamics of animal contests arise from effective forces between contestants.动物竞争的时空动态源于参赛者之间的有效力量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106269118.

引用本文的文献

1
A History of Pain Studies and Changing Attitudes to the Welfare of Crustaceans.疼痛研究史与对甲壳类动物福利态度的转变
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):445. doi: 10.3390/ani15030445.
2
The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?定义马匹体侧性的挑战:这是体侧性还是仅仅是不对称性?
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;15(3):288. doi: 10.3390/ani15030288.
3
Animal emotions and consciousness: a preliminary assessment of researchers' perceptions and biases and prospects for future progress.动物情感与意识:对研究人员认知、偏见及未来进展前景的初步评估
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 13;11(11):241255. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241255. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Animal Emotions and Consciousness: Researchers' Perceptions, Biases, and Prospects for Future Progress.动物情感与意识:研究者的认知、偏见及未来进展前景
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 17:2023.10.12.562087. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.12.562087.
5
Fearful snake pictures make monkeys pessimistic.可怕的蛇的图片让猴子变得悲观。
iScience. 2023 Aug 12;26(9):107622. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107622. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
6
Behavioural Indicators of Pain and Suffering in Arthropods and Might Pain Bite Back?节肢动物疼痛和痛苦的行为指标以及疼痛会反噬吗?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 12;13(16):2602. doi: 10.3390/ani13162602.
7
Social behavior in farm animals: Applying fundamental theory to improve animal welfare.农场动物的社会行为:应用基础理论改善动物福利。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 12;9:932217. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.932217. eCollection 2022.
8
Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.一次乐观,就永远乐观吗?对小鼠认知判断偏差的研究。
Behav Ecol. 2022 Jun 3;33(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arac040. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
9
Once bitten, twice shy: Aggressive and defeated pigs begin agonistic encounters with more negative emotions.一朝被蛇咬,十年怕井绳:好斗的猪和战败的猪在开始争斗时会带着更多负面情绪。
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;244:105488. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105488.
10
Fish self-awareness: limits of current knowledge and theoretical expectations.鱼类的自我意识:当前知识与理论预期的局限
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):447-461. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01566-5. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensions of Animal Consciousness.动物意识的维度。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):789-801. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
2
Aggressive encounters lead to negative affective state in fish.好斗的遭遇会导致鱼类产生消极的情绪状态。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231330. eCollection 2020.
3
Animal affect and decision-making.动物情感与决策。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:144-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
4
The nuts and bolts of animal emotion.动物情感的基本要素。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jun;113:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.迈向情感的比较科学:人类与动物的情感与意识。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:749-770. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.014. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药物干预判断偏差:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:269-286. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
7
Differences in social information are critical to understanding aggressive behavior in animal dominance hierarchies.社会信息的差异对于理解动物优势等级制度中的攻击行为至关重要。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
All by myself? Meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models.独自完成?动物竞赛的荟萃分析更支持自我评估模型而非相互评估模型。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Aug;94(4):1430-1442. doi: 10.1111/brv.12509. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Judgement bias testing in group-housed gestating sows.群居妊娠母猪的判断偏差测试。
Behav Processes. 2019 Feb;159:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
What is animal happiness?动物的幸福是什么?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Feb;1438(1):62-76. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13983. Epub 2018 Oct 22.