Howard Kirsten, Anderson Kate, Cunningham Joan, Cass Alan, Ratcliffe Julie, Whop Lisa J, Dickson Michelle, Viney Rosalie, Mulhern Brendan, Tong Allison, Garvey Gail
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):1739. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09821-z.
Understandings of health and wellbeing are culturally bound. Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people perceive wellbeing and quality of life (QOL) differently from the Western biomedical models of health underpinning existing QOL instruments. Any instrument to measure the wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be culturally appropriate and safe, include relevant dimensions, and be informed by their own values and preferences. Existing QOL instruments do not meet these standards. This study will generate a new preference-based wellbeing measure, WM2Adults, for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, underpinned by their values and preferences.
A mixed methods approach will be used; we will employ decolonising methodologies, privilege Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices and perspectives, and adopt a strengths-based approach rather than a deficit lens. Yarning Circles will be conducted with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia. A candidate item pool will be developed from these data, on which psychometric analysis and validity testing will be undertaken to develop a descriptive system. Following finalisation of the descriptive system, wellbeing states will be valued using a quantitative preference-based approach (best-worst scaling) with a diverse sample of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults (n = 1000). A multinomial (conditional) logit framework will be used to analyse responses and generate a scoring algorithm for the new preference-based WM2Adults measure.
The new wellbeing measure will have wide applicability in assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new programs and services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Results will be disseminated through journals, conferences and policy forums, and will be shared with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, organisations and research participants.
对健康和幸福的理解具有文化局限性。许多原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民对幸福和生活质量(QOL)的认知与支撑现有生活质量工具的西方生物医学健康模式不同。任何用于衡量原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民幸福程度的工具都应在文化上合适且安全,包括相关维度,并以他们自己的价值观和偏好为依据。现有的生活质量工具不符合这些标准。本研究将基于原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民成年人的价值观和偏好,生成一种新的基于偏好的幸福衡量工具WM2Adults。
将采用混合方法;我们将运用去殖民化方法,重视原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的声音和观点,并采用基于优势的方法而非缺陷视角。将与澳大利亚各地的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民进行交流圈活动。将根据这些数据开发一个候选项目库,在此基础上进行心理测量分析和效度测试,以建立一个描述系统。在描述系统最终确定后,将使用基于定量偏好的方法(最佳 - 最差标度法)对幸福状态进行评估,样本为多样化的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民成年人(n = 1000)。将使用多项(条件)逻辑框架来分析回答,并为新的基于偏好的WM2Adults衡量工具生成评分算法。
新的幸福衡量工具在评估针对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的新计划和服务的有效性和成本效益方面将具有广泛适用性。研究结果将通过期刊、会议和政策论坛进行传播,并将与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区、组织及研究参与者分享。