Okada Hiroki, Hirano Daisuke, Taniguchi Takamichi
Department of Occupational Therapy, Medical Corporation Nasukougen Hospital, Nasu, Tochigi, Japan.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Science, International University of Health and Welfare, Ootawara, Tochigi, Japan.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2020 Oct 8;23:100191. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2020.100191. eCollection 2021 Mar.
The functional outcomes for many patients with schizophrenia remain poor, and the specific determinants for and pathways to functional outcomes are not well understood to date. It is unknown whether major determinants of outcomes are achieved via a motivated single pathway or by the motivation and capacity defined in dual pathways. This study investigated whether different aspects of functional outcomes, such as residential, social, and vocational outcomes, are the main determinants of the experience factors for negative symptoms or whether the experience factors and cognitive function are the determinants.
We enrolled 107 patients with schizophrenia. The Social Functioning Scale domains were used to examine whether a single or dual pathway is appropriate for each domain based on the model fit using structural equation modeling.
The model goodness of fit criterion showed a dual pathway for residential and vocational outcomes. In contrast, social and recreational outcomes showed a single pathway.
The major determinants were clearly different for each outcome. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of using different treatment strategies for each outcome. Irrespective of the factors approached, social and recreational outcomes should ultimately focus on motivation. The findings also suggest that interventions should be combined for vulnerable cognitive functions and motivational interventions for residential and vocational outcomes.
许多精神分裂症患者的功能结局仍然较差,迄今为止,功能结局的具体决定因素和途径尚未得到充分理解。目前尚不清楚结局的主要决定因素是通过单一动机途径还是通过双途径中定义的动机和能力来实现。本研究调查了功能结局的不同方面,如居住、社交和职业结局,是否是阴性症状体验因素的主要决定因素,或者体验因素和认知功能是否是决定因素。
我们招募了107名精神分裂症患者。基于结构方程模型的模型拟合,使用社会功能量表领域来检查单途径或双途径是否适用于每个领域。
模型拟合优度标准显示居住和职业结局为双途径。相比之下,社交和娱乐结局显示为单途径。
每个结局的主要决定因素明显不同。因此,我们强调针对每个结局使用不同治疗策略的重要性。无论采用何种因素,社交和娱乐结局最终都应关注动机。研究结果还表明,应针对脆弱的认知功能进行干预,并对居住和职业结局进行动机干预。