Chen Innie, Veth Veerle B, Choudhry Abdul J, Murji Ally, Zakhari Andrew, Black Amanda Y, Agarpao Carmina, Maas Jacques Wm
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 18;11(11):CD003678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003678.pub3.
Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition affecting 10% to 15% of reproductive-age women and may cause dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. One treatment strategy is combining surgery and medical therapy to reduce the recurrence of endometriosis. Though the combination of surgery and medical therapy appears to be beneficial, there is a lack of clarity about the appropriate timing of when medical therapy should be used in relation with surgery, that is, before, after, or both before and after surgery, to maximize treatment response.
To determine the effectiveness of medical therapies for hormonal suppression before, after, or both before and after surgery for endometriosis for improving painful symptoms, reducing disease recurrence, and increasing pregnancy rates.
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and two trials registers in November 2019 together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared medical therapies for hormonal suppression before, after, or before and after, therapeutic surgery for endometriosis.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we combined data using risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Primary outcomes were: painful symptoms of endometriosis as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, other validated scales or dichotomous outcomes; and recurrence of disease as evidenced by EEC (Endoscopic Endometriosis Classification), rAFS (revised American Fertility Society), or rASRM (revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine) scores at second-look laparoscopy.
We included 26 trials with 3457 women with endometriosis. We used the term "surgery alone" to refer to placebo or no medical therapy. Presurgical medical therapy compared with placebo or no medical therapy Compared to surgery alone, we are uncertain if presurgical medical hormonal suppression reduces pain recurrence at 12 months or less (dichotomous) (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.66; 1 RCT, n = 262; very low-quality evidence) or whether it reduces disease recurrence at 12 months - total (AFS score) (MD -9.6, 95% CI -11.42 to -7.78; 1 RCT, n = 80; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if presurgical medical hormonal suppression decreases disease recurrence at 12 months or less (EEC stage) compared to surgery alone (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; 1 RCT, n = 262; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if presurgical medical hormonal suppression improves pregnancy rates compared to surgery alone (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.36; 1 RCT, n = 262; very low-quality evidence). No trials reported pelvic pain at 12 months or less (continuous) or disease recurrence at 12 months or less. Postsurgical medical therapy compared with placebo or no medical therapy We are uncertain about the improvement observed in pelvic pain at 12 months or less (continuous) between postsurgical medical hormonal suppression and surgery alone (MD -0.48, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.31; 4 RCTs, n = 419; I = 94%; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if there is a difference in pain recurrence at 12 months or less (dichotomous) between postsurgical medical hormonal suppression and surgery alone (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12; 5 RCTs, n = 634; I = 20%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if postsurgical medical hormonal suppression improves disease recurrence at 12 months - total (AFS score) compared to surgery alone (MD -2.29, 95% CI -4.01 to -0.57; 1 RCT, n = 51; very low-quality evidence). Disease recurrence at 12 months or less may be reduced with postsurgical medical hormonal suppression compared to surgery alone (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.54; 4 RCTs, n = 433; I = 58%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain about the reduction observed in disease recurrence at 12 months or less (EEC stage) between postsurgical medical hormonal suppression and surgery alone (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91; 1 RCT, n = 285; very low-quality evidence). Pregnancy rate is probably increased with postsurgical medical hormonal suppression compared to surgery alone (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.39; 11 RCTs, n = 932; I = 24%; moderate-quality evidence). Pre- and postsurgical medical therapy compared with surgery alone or surgery and placebo There were no trials identified in the search for this comparison. Presurgical medical therapy compared with postsurgical medical therapy We are uncertain about the difference in pain recurrence at 12 months or less (dichotomous) between postsurgical and presurgical medical hormonal suppression therapy (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.07; 2 RCTs, n = 326; I = 2%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain about the difference in disease recurrence at 12 months or less (EEC stage) between postsurgical and presurgical medical hormonal suppression therapy (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.28; 1 RCT, n = 273; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain about the difference in pregnancy rate between postsurgical and presurgical medical hormonal suppression therapy (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.21; 1 RCT, n = 273; very low-quality evidence). No trials reported pelvic pain at 12 months or less (continuous), disease recurrence at 12 months - total (AFS score) or disease recurrence at 12 months or less (dichotomous). Postsurgical medical therapy compared with pre- and postsurgical medical therapy There were no trials identified in the search for this comparison. Serious adverse effects for medical therapies reviewed There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding serious adverse effects, as no studies reported data suitable for analysis.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the data about the efficacy of medical therapy for endometriosis are inconclusive, related to the timing of hormonal suppression therapy relative to surgery for endometriosis. In our various comparisons of the timing of hormonal suppression therapy, women who receive postsurgical medical therapy compared with no medical therapy or placebo may experience benefit in terms of disease recurrence and pregnancy. There is insufficient evidence regarding hormonal suppression therapy at other time points in relation to surgery for women with endometriosis.
子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的妇科疾病,影响10%至15%的育龄妇女,可能导致性交困难、痛经和不孕。一种治疗策略是将手术和药物治疗相结合,以降低子宫内膜异位症的复发率。尽管手术和药物治疗相结合似乎有益,但对于药物治疗应在手术前、手术后还是手术前后使用,以最大限度地提高治疗反应,目前尚缺乏明确的时机。
确定子宫内膜异位症手术前、手术后或手术前后进行激素抑制的药物治疗对改善疼痛症状、降低疾病复发率和提高妊娠率的有效性。
我们于2019年11月检索了Cochrane妇科与生育(CGF)小组试验注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL以及两个试验注册库,并进行参考文献核对以及与研究作者和该领域专家联系,以识别其他研究。
我们纳入了比较子宫内膜异位症治疗性手术后进行手术前、手术后或手术前后激素抑制的药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。在可能的情况下,我们使用风险比(RR)、标准化均数差或均数差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CI)合并数据。主要结局包括:通过疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、其他经过验证的量表或二分法结局测量的子宫内膜异位症疼痛症状;以及在二次腹腔镜检查时通过EEC(内镜下子宫内膜异位症分类)、rAFS(修订的美国生育协会)或rASRM(修订的美国生殖医学协会)评分证明的疾病复发。
我们纳入了26项试验,共3457名患有子宫内膜异位症的女性。我们使用“单纯手术”一词来指代安慰剂或不进行药物治疗。手术前药物治疗与安慰剂或不进行药物治疗相比与单纯手术相比,我们不确定手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗是否能在12个月及以内降低疼痛复发率(二分法)(RR 1.10,95%CI 0.72至1.66;1项RCT,n = 262;极低质量证据),或者是否能在12个月时降低疾病复发率(总AFS评分)(MD -9.6,95%CI -11.42至-7.78;1项RCT,n = 80;极低质量证据)。与单纯手术相比,我们不确定手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗是否能在12个月及以内降低疾病复发率(EEC分期)(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.78至1.00;1项RCT,n = 262;极低质量证据)。与单纯手术相比,我们不确定手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗是否能提高妊娠率(RR 1.16,95%CI 0.99至1.36;1项RCT,n = 262;极低质量证据)。没有试验报告12个月及以内的盆腔疼痛(连续性)或12个月及以内的疾病复发情况。手术后药物治疗与安慰剂或不进行药物治疗相比我们不确定手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗与单纯手术相比,在12个月及以内的盆腔疼痛改善情况(连续性)(MD -0.48,95%CI -0.64至-0.31;4项RCT,n = 419;I² = 94%;极低质量证据)。我们不确定手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗与单纯手术相比,在12个月及以内的疼痛复发率是否存在差异(二分法)(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.65至1.12;5项RCT,n = 634;I² = 20%;低质量证据)。与单纯手术相比,我们不确定手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗是否能在12个月时改善疾病复发率(总AFS评分)(MD -2.29,95%CI -4.01至-0.57;1项RCT,n = 51;极低质量证据)。与单纯手术相比,手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗可能会降低12个月及以内的疾病复发率(RR 0.30,95%CI 0.17至0.54;4项RCT,n = 433;I² = 58%;低质量证据)。我们不确定手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗与单纯手术相比,在12个月及以内的疾病复发率降低情况(EEC分期)(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.70至0.91;1项RCT,n = 285;极低质量证据)。与单纯手术相比,手术后进行激素抑制的药物治疗可能会提高妊娠率(RR 1.22,95%CI 1.06至1.39;11项RCT,n = 932;I² = 24%;中等质量证据)。手术前和手术后药物治疗与单纯手术或手术加安慰剂相比在本次检索中未发现相关试验。手术前药物治疗与手术后药物治疗相比我们不确定手术后和手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗在12个月及以内的疼痛复发率差异(二分法)(RR 1.40,95%CI 0.95至2.07;2项RCT,n = 326;I² = 2%;低质量证据)。我们不确定手术后和手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗在12个月及以内的疾病复发率差异(EEC分期)(RR 1.10,95%CI 0.95至1.28;1项RCT,n = 273;极低质量证据)。我们不确定手术后和手术前进行激素抑制的药物治疗在妊娠率方面的差异(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.91至1.21;1项RCT,n = 273;极低质量证据)。没有试验报告12个月及以内的盆腔疼痛(连续性)、12个月时的疾病复发率(总AFS评分)或12个月及以内的疾病复发率(二分法)。手术后药物治疗与手术前和手术后药物治疗相比在本次检索中未发现相关试验。所审查的药物治疗的严重不良反应由于没有研究报告适合分析的数据,因此没有足够的证据就严重不良反应得出结论。
我们的结果表明,关于子宫内膜异位症药物治疗疗效的数据尚无定论,这与激素抑制治疗相对于子宫内膜异位症手术的时机有关。在我们对激素抑制治疗时机的各种比较中,接受手术后药物治疗的女性与不进行药物治疗或使用安慰剂的女性相比,在疾病复发和妊娠方面可能会受益。对于子宫内膜异位症女性,关于激素抑制治疗与手术相关的其他时间点,没有足够的证据。