Kim Sang Hwa, Choi Jae Hyung, Kang Myung Jin, Cha Jae Kwan, Kim Dae Hyun, Nah Hyun Wook, Park Hyun Seok, Kim Sang Hyun, Huh Jae Taeck
Busan-Ulsan Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Jul;62(4):405-413. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0007. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
We evaluated efficacy of combining proximal balloon guiding catheter (antegrade flow arrest) and distal access catheter (aspiration at the site of occlusion) in thrombectomy for anterior circulation ischemic stroke.
We retrospectively analyzed 116 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever. The patients were divided by the techniques adopted, the combined technique (proximal balloon guiding catheter and large bore distal access catheter) group (n=57, 49.1%) and the conventional (guiding catheter with stent retriever) technique group (n=59, 50.9%). We evaluated baseline characteristics (epidemiologic data, clinical and imaging characteristics) and procedure details (the number of retrieval attempts, procedure time), as well as angiographic (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, distal thrombus migration) and clinical outcome (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] at 3 months) of them.
The number of retrieval attempts was lower (p=0.002) and the first-pass successful reperfusion rate was higher (56.1% vs. 28.8%; p=0.003) in the combined technique group. And the rate of final result of TICI score 3 was higher (68.4% vs. 28.8%; p<0.01) and distal thrombus migration rate was also lower (15.8% vs. 40.7%; p=0.021) in the combined technique group. Early strong neurologic improvement (improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥11 or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≤1 at discharge) rate (57.9% vs. 36.2%; p=0.02) and favorable clinical outcome (mRS at 3 months ≤2) rate (59.6% vs. 33.9%; p=0.005) were also better in the combined technique group.
The combined technique needs lesser attempts, decreases distal migration, increases TICI 3 reperfusion and achieves better clinical outcomes.
我们评估了在急性前循环缺血性卒中血栓清除术中联合使用近端球囊导引导管(顺行血流阻断)和远端通路导管(闭塞部位抽吸)的疗效。
我们回顾性分析了116例行支架取栓机械血栓清除术的患者。根据所采用的技术将患者分为联合技术组(近端球囊导引导管和大口径远端通路导管)(n = 57,49.1%)和传统(带支架取栓器的导引导管)技术组(n = 59,50.9%)。我们评估了基线特征(流行病学数据、临床和影像学特征)和手术细节(取栓尝试次数、手术时间),以及血管造影结果(脑梗死溶栓(TICI)评分、远端血栓迁移情况)和临床结局(出院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、3个月时改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分)。
联合技术组的取栓尝试次数更少(p = 0.002),首次通过成功再灌注率更高(56.1% 对28.8%;p = 0.003)。联合技术组的TICI评分3级最终结果率更高(68.4% 对28.8%;p < 0.01),远端血栓迁移率也更低(15.8% 对40.7%;p = 0.021)。联合技术组的早期显著神经功能改善(出院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表改善≥11分或美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表≤1分)率(�7.9% 对36.2%;p = 0.02)和良好临床结局(3个月时mRS≤2)率(59.6% 对33.9%;p = 0.005)也更好。
联合技术所需尝试次数更少,减少了远端迁移,增加了TICI 3级再灌注,并取得了更好的临床结局。