模拟涉及口咽和唾液的不同性行为对男男性行为者多个解剖部位感染的影响。

Modelling the contribution that different sexual practices involving the oropharynx and saliva have on infections at multiple anatomical sites in men who have sex with men.

作者信息

Xu Xianglong, Chow Eric P F, Ong Jason J, Hoebe Christian J P A, Williamson Deborah, Shen Mingwang, Kong Fabian Yuh Shiong, Hocking Jane S, Fairley Christopher K, Zhang Lei

机构信息

China Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2021 May;97(3):183-189. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054565. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of sexual practices that transmit in men who have sex with men (MSM) is controversial. No studies have modelled potential transmission when one sexual practice follows another in the same sexual encounter ('sequential sexual practices'). Our aim was to test what sequential practices were necessary to replicate the high proportion of MSM who have more than one anatomical site infected with gonorrhoea ('multisite infection').

METHODS

To test our aim, we developed eight compartmental models. We first used a baseline model (model 1) that included no sequential sexual practices. We then added three possible sequential transmission routes to model 1: (1) oral sex followed by anal sex (or vice versa) (model 2); (2) using saliva as a lubricant for penile-anal sex (model 3) and (3) oral sex followed by oral-anal sex (rimming) or vice versa (model 4). The next four models (models 5-8) used combinations of the three transmission routes.

RESULTS

The baseline model could only replicate infection at the single anatomical site and underestimated multisite infection. When we added the three transmission routes to the baseline model, oral sex, followed by anal sex or vice versa, could replicate the prevalence of multisite infection. The other two transmission routes alone or together could not replicate multisite infection without the inclusion of oral sex followed by anal sex or vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our gonorrhoea model suggests sexual practices that involve oral followed by anal sex (or vice versa) may be important for explaining the high proportion of multisite infection.

摘要

背景

男男性行为者(MSM)中传播疾病的性行为谱存在争议。尚无研究对同一次性交过程中一种性行为之后紧接着另一种性行为(“连续性性行为”)时的潜在传播情况进行建模。我们的目的是测试哪些连续性性行为对于复制有超过一个解剖部位感染淋病(“多部位感染”)的MSM的高比例情况是必要的。

方法

为了测试我们的目的,我们开发了八个房室模型。我们首先使用了一个不包括连续性性行为的基线模型(模型1)。然后我们在模型1中添加了三种可能的连续传播途径:(1)口交后进行肛交(或反之亦然)(模型2);(2)使用唾液作为阴茎 - 肛交的润滑剂(模型3)以及(3)口交后进行口肛交(舔肛)或反之亦然(模型4)。接下来的四个模型(模型5 - 8)使用了这三种传播途径的组合。

结果

基线模型只能复制单个解剖部位的感染情况,并且低估了多部位感染。当我们在基线模型中添加这三种传播途径时,口交后进行肛交或反之亦然能够复制多部位感染的患病率。单独或一起使用的其他两种传播途径在不包括口交后进行肛交或反之亦然的情况下无法复制多部位感染。

结论

我们的淋病模型表明,涉及口交后进行肛交(或反之亦然)的性行为对于解释多部位感染的高比例情况可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索