Suppr超能文献

改良根治性乳房切除术后联合浅、深锯齿肌平面阻滞与胸肌锯齿肌平面阻滞镇痛效果的比较。

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of combined superficial and deep serratus anterior plane block versus pectoserratus plane block following modified radical mastectomy surgery.

作者信息

Ozguner Yusuf, Yazar Can Ozan, Aydın Ferit, Zengin Musa, Arık Emine, Kotanoğlu Mustafa Sırrı, Altınsoy Savaş, Ergil Julide

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03213-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both the pectoserratus plane block and the combined deep and superficial serratus anterior plane block (CSAPB) are recognized as effective regional anesthesia methods for pain control. This research aims to assess the ability of two different nerve blocks to provide analgesia.

METHODS

The study included 60 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Participants were allocated into separate groups: Group P (Pectoserratus Plane Block) and Group S (CSAPB). The primary outcome was the tramadol consumption, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of pain levels.

RESULTS

The median (Q1, Q3) postoperative 24-hour tramadol consumption was 60 (60,80) mg in Group P and 60 (40,60) mg in Group S. ( = 0.006) Additionally, higher NRS scores were observed in group P at 2 and 4 h.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that the CSAPB and the pectoserratus plane block provided comparable analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing MRM. This approach may serve as an effective alternative to the pectoserratus plane block.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05961735.

摘要

背景

胸锯肌平面阻滞和深浅层联合锯肌前平面阻滞(CSAPB)均被认为是有效的区域麻醉方法,用于控制疼痛。本研究旨在评估两种不同神经阻滞提供镇痛的能力。

方法

该研究纳入了60例行改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的患者。参与者被分为不同的组:P组(胸锯肌平面阻滞)和S组(CSAPB)。主要结局是曲马多的消耗量,次要结局是疼痛程度的评估。

结果

P组术后24小时曲马多消耗量的中位数(Q1,Q3)为60(60,80)mg,S组为60(40,60)mg。(P = 0.006)此外,P组在2小时和4小时时的数字评分量表(NRS)得分更高。

结论

在本研究中,我们发现CSAPB和胸锯肌平面阻滞在接受MRM的患者中提供了相当的镇痛效果。这种方法可能是胸锯肌平面阻滞的有效替代方法。

试验注册号

NCT05961735。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86c/12305919/f4d1924285ff/12871_2025_3213_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验