Ozguner Yusuf, Yazar Can Ozan, Aydın Ferit, Zengin Musa, Arık Emine, Kotanoğlu Mustafa Sırrı, Altınsoy Savaş, Ergil Julide
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03213-9.
Both the pectoserratus plane block and the combined deep and superficial serratus anterior plane block (CSAPB) are recognized as effective regional anesthesia methods for pain control. This research aims to assess the ability of two different nerve blocks to provide analgesia.
The study included 60 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Participants were allocated into separate groups: Group P (Pectoserratus Plane Block) and Group S (CSAPB). The primary outcome was the tramadol consumption, while the secondary outcome was the assessment of pain levels.
The median (Q1, Q3) postoperative 24-hour tramadol consumption was 60 (60,80) mg in Group P and 60 (40,60) mg in Group S. ( = 0.006) Additionally, higher NRS scores were observed in group P at 2 and 4 h.
In this study, we found that the CSAPB and the pectoserratus plane block provided comparable analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing MRM. This approach may serve as an effective alternative to the pectoserratus plane block.
NCT05961735.
胸锯肌平面阻滞和深浅层联合锯肌前平面阻滞(CSAPB)均被认为是有效的区域麻醉方法,用于控制疼痛。本研究旨在评估两种不同神经阻滞提供镇痛的能力。
该研究纳入了60例行改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的患者。参与者被分为不同的组:P组(胸锯肌平面阻滞)和S组(CSAPB)。主要结局是曲马多的消耗量,次要结局是疼痛程度的评估。
P组术后24小时曲马多消耗量的中位数(Q1,Q3)为60(60,80)mg,S组为60(40,60)mg。(P = 0.006)此外,P组在2小时和4小时时的数字评分量表(NRS)得分更高。
在本研究中,我们发现CSAPB和胸锯肌平面阻滞在接受MRM的患者中提供了相当的镇痛效果。这种方法可能是胸锯肌平面阻滞的有效替代方法。
NCT05961735。