Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bamenda, Bamenda Regional Hospital, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bamenda, Bambili, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 10;37:45. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.45.25684. eCollection 2020.
it is unclear what the optimal treatment regimen for previously treated patients with rifampicin-susceptible isoniazid resistant tuberculosis should be. Conflicting evidence exists as to the effectiveness of the WHO standardized category II regimen in these patients. The objectives were to compare treatment outcomes between previously treated rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis patients with and without isoniazid resistance using the category II regimen and determine factors associated with an unfavourable outcome in those with isoniazid resistance in four regions of Cameroon.
we conducted a retrospective review of all bacteriologically confirmed previously treated rifampicin-susceptible patients with and without isoniazid resistance registered in four regions of Cameroon from January 2012 to March 2015.
a total of 753 patients with a mean age of 38 ± 12 years including 498(66%) males were registered. Forty seven of the 753 had isoniazid-resistant TB, giving a prevalence of 6.2% (95% CI: 4.7-8.2). Treatment outcomes could only be ascertained for 733 patients as 20 (2.7%) were transferred out to other regions. Twenty-nine percent of patients with isoniazid resistance as against 21% of isoniazid susceptible patients had an unfavourable outcome (p = 0.32). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, only HIV infection was significantly associated with an unfavourable outcome in isoniazid-resistant patients (p = 0.02).
treatment outcomes using WHO category II regimen in previously treated rifampicin -susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis patients with and without isoniazid resistance in four regions of Cameroon are similar. HIV infection is an independent risk factor for an unfavourable outcome in patients with rifampicin-susceptible isoniazid-resistant disease treated with this regimen.
目前尚不清楚利福平敏感、异烟肼耐药的复治结核病患者的最佳治疗方案是什么。对于世界卫生组织(WHO)标准化的 II 类方案在这些患者中的有效性,存在相互矛盾的证据。本研究的目的是比较在喀麦隆四个地区,使用 II 类方案治疗的利福平敏感、有和无异烟肼耐药的复治肺结核患者的治疗结局,并确定异烟肼耐药患者中与不良结局相关的因素。
我们对 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月在喀麦隆四个地区登记的所有经细菌学证实的利福平敏感、有和无异烟肼耐药的复治患者进行了回顾性研究。
共登记了 753 例患者,平均年龄为 38 ± 12 岁,其中 498 例(66%)为男性。753 例患者中有 47 例(6.2%)为异烟肼耐药性结核病,异烟肼耐药率为 4.7%至 8.2%。由于 20 例(2.7%)患者转至其他地区,因此仅对 733 例患者的治疗结局进行了评估。异烟肼耐药患者中,29%的患者治疗结局不佳,而异烟肼敏感患者中,这一比例为 21%(p = 0.32)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,仅 HIV 感染与异烟肼耐药患者治疗结局不佳显著相关(p = 0.02)。
在喀麦隆四个地区,使用 WHO 分类 II 方案治疗利福平敏感、有和无异烟肼耐药的复治肺结核患者的治疗结局相似。在使用该方案治疗利福平敏感、异烟肼耐药疾病的患者中,HIV 感染是治疗结局不佳的独立危险因素。