Suppr超能文献

在腹腔镜开窗式胆囊次全切除术治疗困难胆囊时,用氰基丙烯酸酯胶闭塞胆囊管。

Occlusion of the cystic duct with cyanoacrylate glue at laparoscopic subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy for a difficult gallbladder.

作者信息

Jenner Deborah C, Klimovskij Michail, Nicholls Michael, Bates Tom

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Conquest Hospital, St Leonards-on-Sea, UK.

Centre for Professional Practice, University of Kent, Kent, UK.

出版信息

Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Feb;122(1):23-28. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2020.1846937. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subtotal cholecystectomy is occasionally the management of choice in the patient with a hostile Calot's triangle but when it is not considered safe to close the cystic duct this often leads to a biliary fistula. In order to reduce this morbidity a novel strategy to seal the cystic duct with cyanoacrylate glue was introduced. The outcome of the two strategies have been compared.

METHODS

Patients who had a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy where the cystic duct was left open, the Unsecured group, were compared with those where the duct orifice was occluded with cyanoacrylate glue, the Glued group. The outcome of the two strategies have been compared by duration of biliary drainage, whether a leak was shown on ERCP, time to removal of the drain, length of hospital stay, the re-operation and readmission rates.

RESULTS

In 78 cases of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy it was considered unsafe to close the cystic duct. 36 patients were managed without closure of the cystic duct, the Unsecured group and bile drainage continued for more than 3 days in 9 cases (25%) compared with 3 of 42 cases (7%) treated with glue, the Glued group (NS). Postoperative ERCP demonstrated a leak more frequently in the Unsecured group ( < 0.02). The length of stay was reduced in the Glued group. (0.9 compared with 3.0 days,  < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that glue may be a safe option to occlude the cystic duct orifice and reduce hospital stay when this cannot safely be closed at subtotal cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景

对于胆囊三角解剖困难的患者,有时会选择行胆囊次全切除术,但当认为无法安全闭合胆囊管时,常导致胆瘘。为降低这种并发症的发生率,引入了一种用氰基丙烯酸酯胶封闭胆囊管的新策略。比较了这两种策略的结果。

方法

将腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术中胆囊管未封闭的患者(未封闭组)与用氰基丙烯酸酯胶封闭胆囊管开口的患者(胶合组)进行比较。通过胆汁引流持续时间、ERCP是否显示有渗漏、引流管拔除时间、住院时间、再次手术率和再入院率来比较两种策略的结果。

结果

在78例腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术中,认为无法安全闭合胆囊管。36例患者未闭合胆囊管(未封闭组),9例(25%)胆汁引流持续超过3天,而胶合组42例中有3例(7%)出现这种情况(无显著性差异)。术后ERCP显示未封闭组渗漏更为常见(P<0.02)。胶合组住院时间缩短(0.9天对比3.0天,P<0.01)。

结论

结果表明,在胆囊次全切除术中无法安全闭合胆囊管时,使用胶水封闭胆囊管开口可能是一种安全的选择,并可缩短住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验