Research Unit, Södertälje Hospital, Södertälje, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet at Danderyds Hospital (KIDS), Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2021 Mar;48(3):310-317. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13439. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Renal water conservation after an overnight fast mirrors the habitual intake of liquid. The hypothesis in the present study was that water conservation influences the diuretic response to infusion of two types of crystalloid fluid. Twenty-three elderly male patients (mean age 72 years) underwent a total of 46 intravenous infusions of 1.0 or 1.5 L of either hypotonic non-electrolyte fluid (glycine 1.5%) or isotonic electrolyte fluid (Ringer's acetate or 0.9% saline). Urine osmolality (used to indicate renal water conservation) and plasma creatinine were measured before the infusions started. A two-volume model was fitted to repeated measurements of the blood haemoglobin concentration and the urinary excretion, using mixed-effects modelling software. Urine osmolality was examined as a potential covariate to the fixed kinetic parameters. The results show that distribution and redistribution of infused fluid occurred twice as fast for the non-electrolyte fluids as for the electrolyte-containing fluids, while the urine flow showed less difference. For both types of fluid, high urine osmolality served as a statistically significant covariate to the rate constant describing urinary excretion. Simulations showed that a high pre-infusion urine osmolality doubled the time required for the kidneys to excrete 50% of a 30-minute infusion. High plasma creatinine independently prolonged the elimination of non-electrolyte fluid. The use of 0.9% saline instead of Ringer's prolonged the excretion of electrolyte-containing fluid. In conclusion, renal water conservation is a determinant of the diuretic response to crystalloid fluid, regardless of whether the fluid contains electrolytes, and it should be considered in fluid balance studies.
禁食一夜后肾脏的保水作用反映了习惯性液体摄入。本研究的假设是,保水作用会影响两种类型晶体液输注的利尿反应。23 名老年男性患者(平均年龄 72 岁)总共接受了 46 次静脉输注,输注液量分别为 1.0 或 1.5 L 的低张非电解质液(甘氨酸 1.5%)或等张电解质液(醋酸林格液或 0.9%生理盐水)。在输液开始前测量尿渗透压(用于指示肾脏保水作用)和血浆肌酐。使用混合效应建模软件,根据血血红蛋白浓度和尿液排泄的重复测量,拟合两体积模型。将尿渗透压作为固定动力学参数的潜在协变量进行检查。结果表明,与含电解质的液体相比,非电解质液体的分布和再分布速度快两倍,而尿液流量的差异较小。对于这两种类型的液体,高尿渗透压作为描述尿液排泄的速率常数的统计学显著协变量。模拟表明,高预输注尿渗透压使肾脏排泄 30 分钟输注的 50%所需的时间增加一倍。高血浆肌酐独立延长了非电解质液的清除时间。使用 0.9%生理盐水代替林格氏液延长了含电解质液体的排泄时间。总之,肾脏保水作用是晶体液利尿反应的决定因素,无论液体是否含有电解质,在液体平衡研究中都应考虑这一点。