Southampton Business School, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Department of Education Science, Psychology, Communication Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):337-342. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
Empirical evidence has shown that peer pressure can impact human risk-taking behavior. With robots becoming ever more present in a range of human settings, it is crucial to examine whether robots can have a similar impact. Using the balloon analogue risk task (BART), participants' risk-taking behavior was measured when alone, in the presence of a silent robot, or in the presence of a robot that actively encouraged risk-taking behavior. In the BART, shown to be a proxy for real risk-taking behavior, participants must weigh risk against potential payout. Our results reveal that participants who were encouraged by the robot did take more risks, while the mere presence of the robot in the robot control condition did not entice participants to show more risk-taking behavior. Our results point to both possible benefits and perils that robots might pose to human decision-making. Although increasing risk-taking behavior in some cases has obvious advantages, it could also have detrimental consequences that are only now starting to emerge.
实证证据表明,同伴压力会影响人类的冒险行为。随着机器人在各种人类环境中越来越普遍,研究机器人是否会产生类似的影响至关重要。本研究使用气球模拟风险任务(BART),当参与者独自、在沉默机器人存在的情况下或在积极鼓励冒险行为的机器人存在的情况下,测量他们的冒险行为。BART 被证明是真实冒险行为的替代指标,参与者必须权衡风险与潜在收益。我们的结果表明,受到机器人鼓励的参与者确实承担了更多的风险,而机器人在机器人控制条件下的存在并没有诱使参与者表现出更多的冒险行为。我们的研究结果表明机器人可能对人类决策带来的好处和潜在风险。虽然在某些情况下增加冒险行为有明显的优势,但它也可能带来负面影响,而这些影响才刚刚开始显现。