AIRO-IDLab, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University-Imec, Technologiepark 126, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
WAVES Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark 126, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 16;23(10):4786. doi: 10.3390/s23104786.
Touch can have a strong effect on interactions between people, and as such, it is expected to be important to the interactions people have with robots. In an earlier work, we showed that the intensity of tactile interaction with a robot can change how much people are willing to take risks. This study further develops our understanding of the relationship between human risk-taking behaviour, the physiological responses by the user, and the intensity of the tactile interaction with a social robot. We used data collected with physiological sensors during the playing of a risk-taking game (the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, or BART). The results of a mixed-effects model were used as a baseline to predict risk-taking propensity from physiological measures, and these results were further improved through the use of two machine learning techniques-support vector regression (SVR) and multi-input convolutional multihead attention (MCMA)-to achieve low-latency risk-taking behaviour prediction during human-robot tactile interaction. The performance of the models was evaluated based on mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R squared score (R2), which obtained the optimal result with MCMA yielding an MAE of 3.17, an RMSE of 4.38, and an R2 of 0.93 compared with the baseline of 10.97 MAE, 14.73 RMSE, and 0.30 R2. The results of this study offer new insights into the interplay between physiological data and the intensity of risk-taking behaviour in predicting human risk-taking behaviour during human-robot tactile interactions. This work illustrates that physiological activation and the intensity of tactile interaction play a prominent role in risk processing during human-robot tactile interaction and demonstrates that it is feasible to use human physiological data and behavioural data to predict risk-taking behaviour in human-robot tactile interaction.
触摸对人与人之间的互动有强烈的影响,因此,触摸预计对人与机器人之间的互动很重要。在早期的工作中,我们表明与机器人进行触觉交互的强度可以改变人们愿意承担风险的程度。本研究进一步加深了我们对人类冒险行为、用户生理反应与社交机器人触觉交互强度之间关系的理解。我们使用在风险游戏(气球模拟风险任务,即 BART)中收集的生理传感器数据。混合效应模型的结果被用作从生理测量预测冒险倾向的基线,并通过使用两种机器学习技术——支持向量回归(SVR)和多输入卷积多头注意力(MCMA)——来进一步改进这些结果,以实现人类-机器人触觉交互期间的低延迟冒险行为预测。模型的性能基于平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和 R 平方得分(R2)进行评估,MCMA 的结果最佳,MAE 为 3.17,RMSE 为 4.38,R2 为 0.93,而基线的 MAE 为 10.97,RMSE 为 14.73,R2 为 0.30。本研究的结果提供了新的见解,即生理数据和冒险行为强度之间的相互作用在预测人机触觉交互期间的人类冒险行为中的作用。这项工作表明,生理激活和触觉交互的强度在人机触觉交互中的风险处理中起着重要作用,并证明使用人类生理数据和行为数据来预测人机触觉交互中的冒险行为是可行的。