• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟代理与青少年的冒险行为:助推的双重性。

Virtual agents and risk-taking behavior in adolescence: the twofold nature of nudging.

机构信息

Research Unit On Theory of Mind, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Research Unit On Robopsychology in the Lifespan, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38399-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38399-w
PMID:37433842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336118/
Abstract

Peer pressure can influence risk-taking behavior and it is particularly felt during adolescence. With artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly present in a range of everyday human contexts, including virtual environments, it is important to examine whether AI can have an impact on human's decision making processes and behavior. By using the balloon analogue risk task (BART) evaluating propensity to take risk, in this study 113 adolescents' risk-taking behavior was measured when playing alone and in the presence of either a robot avatar or human avatar. In the avatar conditions, participants performed the BART while the avatars either (1) verbally incited risk-taking or (2) discouraged risk-taking (experimental tasks). Risk-taking behavior in the BART was assessed in terms of total number of pumps, gain and explosions. Tendency to impulsivity was also evaluated, as well as the effects of age and gender on risky behavior. The main finding showed a significant effect of both avatars on risk-taking tendency, with riskier behavior during incitement than discouragement conditions, the latter being also substantially different from the playing-alone condition. The results of this study open up new questions in a very sensitive and timely topic and offer various insights into the effect of nudging on adolescents' behavior in virtual contexts.

摘要

同辈压力会影响冒险行为,这种影响在青少年时期尤为明显。随着人工智能(AI)在包括虚拟环境在内的各种日常人类环境中越来越普及,研究 AI 是否会对人类的决策过程和行为产生影响变得非常重要。本研究使用气球模拟风险任务(BART)评估冒险倾向,通过该任务测量了 113 名青少年在独自和面对机器人化身或人类化身时的冒险行为。在化身条件下,参与者在化身(1)口头煽动冒险或(2)劝阻冒险(实验任务)的情况下完成 BART。通过总泵数、收益和爆炸来评估 BART 中的冒险行为。冲动倾向也得到了评估,同时还评估了年龄和性别对冒险行为的影响。主要发现表明,两个化身都对冒险倾向有显著影响,在煽动条件下的冒险行为比劝阻条件下更冒险,后者与独自玩游戏的条件也有很大不同。这项研究的结果在一个非常敏感和及时的话题上提出了新的问题,并为推动对青少年在虚拟环境中的行为的影响提供了各种见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/10336118/5850bf6ff8e3/41598_2023_38399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/10336118/a279e345f957/41598_2023_38399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/10336118/5850bf6ff8e3/41598_2023_38399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/10336118/a279e345f957/41598_2023_38399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e10/10336118/5850bf6ff8e3/41598_2023_38399_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Virtual agents and risk-taking behavior in adolescence: the twofold nature of nudging.虚拟代理与青少年的冒险行为:助推的双重性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38399-w.
2
Parental rearing behavior prospectively predicts adolescents' risky decision-making and feedback-related electrical brain activity.父母养育行为前瞻性地预测青少年的冒险决策和反馈相关的大脑电活动。
Dev Sci. 2013 May;16(3):409-27. doi: 10.1111/desc.12026.
3
Are Mid-Adolescents Prone to Risky Decisions? The Influence of Task Setting and Individual Differences in Temperament.青少年中期的人容易做出冒险决策吗?任务设置和气质方面个体差异的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 10;10:1497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01497. eCollection 2019.
4
Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making only Present in Males?同伴在场效应对青少年高风险决策的影响是否仅存在于男性中?
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):693-705. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01179-9. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Neural processes during adolescent risky decision making are associated with conformity to peer influence.青少年冒险决策过程中的神经过程与遵从同伴影响有关。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Aug;44:100794. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100794. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
The Robot Made Me Do It: Human-Robot Interaction and Risk-Taking Behavior.机器人让我这么做的:人机交互与冒险行为。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):337-342. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Peers' Choices Influence Adolescent Risk-taking Especially When Explicit Risk Information is Lacking.同伴的选择尤其会影响青少年的冒险行为,尤其是在缺乏明确风险信息的情况下。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Jun;31(2):402-416. doi: 10.1111/jora.12611. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
A new look at risk-taking: using a translational approach to examine risk-taking behavior on the balloon analogue risk task.对冒险行为的新审视:采用转化方法研究气球模拟风险任务中的冒险行为。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;22(5):444-52. doi: 10.1037/a0037421. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
9
Risk Taking by Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a Behavioral and Psychophysiological Investigation of Peer Influence.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)青少年的冒险行为:同伴影响的行为和心理生理学研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;48(9):1129-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00666-z.
10
Relationship between virtual reality balloon analogue risk task and risky decision-making.虚拟现实气球模拟风险任务与冒险决策之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0282097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282097. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Ready (or Not) Player One: Initial Musings on the Metaverse.《头号玩家》(无论你是否准备好):关于元宇宙的初步思考
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Jan;25(1):1-2. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.29234.editorial. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations.元宇宙在教育中的应用:可能性与局限性。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:32. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Peers' Choices Influence Adolescent Risk-taking Especially When Explicit Risk Information is Lacking.同伴的选择尤其会影响青少年的冒险行为,尤其是在缺乏明确风险信息的情况下。
J Res Adolesc. 2021 Jun;31(2):402-416. doi: 10.1111/jora.12611. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
The Robot Made Me Do It: Human-Robot Interaction and Risk-Taking Behavior.机器人让我这么做的:人机交互与冒险行为。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):337-342. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
5
Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity.儿童会顺应,成年人会抗拒:一个机器人群体引发了同伴压力对规范性社会顺应的影响。
Sci Robot. 2018 Aug 15;3(21). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat7111.
6
A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children's Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots.一个机器人并不比另一个更有价值:探究儿童对不同类人机器人的心理状态归因。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011. eCollection 2020.
7
The understanding of congruent and incongruent referential gaze in 17-month-old infants: an eye-tracking study comparing human and robot.17 个月大婴儿对一致和不一致参照性注视的理解:一项比较人类和机器人的眼动研究
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 17;10(1):11918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69140-6.
8
Shall I Trust You? From Child-Robot Interaction to Trusting Relationships.我该信任你吗?从儿童与机器人的互动到信任关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00469. eCollection 2020.
9
Developmental patterns of change in the influence of safe and risky peer choices on risky decision-making.安全和危险同伴选择对冒险决策影响的变化发展模式。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12717. doi: 10.1111/desc.12717. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
10
Dissecting "Peer Presence" and "Decisions" to Deepen Understanding of Peer Influence on Adolescent Risky Choice.剖析“同伴在场”和“决策”,深入理解同伴对青少年冒险选择的影响。
Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):2086-2103. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13081. Epub 2018 Apr 27.