• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术治疗肥胖症:系统评价。

Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine-Beclere Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92140, Clamart, France.

Department of Bariatric Surgery, CHU de la Réunion, Saint Denis, de la Réunion, France.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):1168-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05112-z. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-05112-z
PMID:33215360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) has been used as a bariatric procedure for the treatment of obesity, regarded as less invasive and less expensive than other surgical bariatric procedures. We aimed to systematically review the literature and highlight recent clinical data regarding outcomes of LGCP in the treatment of obesity.

METHODS

A comprehensive research of Pubmed database on LGCP was performed. The search was conducted on the first of May 2020 and was not limited to any date range. Outcomes of interest were surgical technique, postoperative complications, weight loss outcomes, comorbidities improvement or resolution, and revisional surgeries after technical failure or weight regain.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles were eligible for inclusion, with 3103 patients undergoing LGCP (mean age: 13.8-55 years). Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) ranged from 31.2 to 47.8 kg/m. Mean operative time ranged from 48 to 193 min. Length of hospital stay ranged from 0.75 to 7.2 days. Most studies provided postoperative follow-up up to 12 months. Mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) ranged from 30.2 to 71.1% and 35 to 77.1% at 6 and 12 months post-LGCP, respectively. Only one study followed patients for more than 10 years and mean %EWL at 1, 5, and 10 years was 67%, 55%, and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

LGCP seems to be an acceptable surgical procedure for the treatment of obesity, especially in centers having a low medical budget. However, most existing comparative studies report superiority of LSG regarding weight loss.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术(LGCP)已被用作治疗肥胖症的减肥手术,因其具有微创和较低的费用,优于其他减肥手术。我们旨在系统地回顾文献,并强调 LGCP 治疗肥胖症的最新临床数据。

方法

对 Pubmed 数据库进行了全面的 LGCP 研究。搜索于 2020 年 5 月 1 日进行,且不受任何日期范围限制。研究的结果为手术技术、术后并发症、体重减轻结果、合并症的改善或缓解以及在技术失败或体重反弹后进行的翻修手术。

结果

53 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中 3103 例患者接受了 LGCP(平均年龄:13.8-55 岁)。术前平均体重指数(BMI)范围为 31.2-47.8kg/m。平均手术时间范围为 48-193 分钟。住院时间范围为 0.75-7.2 天。大多数研究提供了术后 12 个月的随访。术后 6 个月和 12 个月的平均超重体重减轻百分比(%EWL)范围分别为 30.2%-71.1%和 35%-77.1%。仅有一项研究对患者进行了超过 10 年的随访,LGCP 术后 1、5 和 10 年的平均 %EWL 分别为 67%、55%和 42%。

结论

LGCP 似乎是一种治疗肥胖症的可接受的手术方法,特别是在医疗预算较低的中心。然而,大多数现有的对照研究报告称,LSG 在减轻体重方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for the Treatment of Obesity: a Systematic Review.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术治疗肥胖症:系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):1168-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05112-z. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic greater curvature plication versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.比较腹腔镜大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2186-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4373-9. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Case-Matched Control Study.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的临床疗效比较:一项病例对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3527-y.
4
Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic greater curvature plication and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术短期疗效比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2768-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2805-y. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
5
Laparoscopic greater curvature plication: surgical techniques and early outcomes of a Chinese experience.腹腔镜大弯折叠术:中国经验的手术技术及早期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
6
Feasibility and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Revisional Procedure After Failed Gastric Plication in Morbidly Obese Patients.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为病态肥胖患者胃折叠术失败后的修正手术的可行性和疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Mar;31(3):284-289. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0432. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Critical Appraisal of the Role of Gastric Plication in Bariatric Surgery.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的长期疗效:胃折叠术在减重手术中作用的批判性评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 17;58(9):1299. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091299.
8
Five-Year Outcomes: Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for Treatment of Morbid Obesity.五年随访结果:腹腔镜大弯折叠术治疗病态肥胖症
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2818-2828. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2709-3.
9
Comparison Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Treatments for Obesity: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术治疗肥胖症的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2021 Sep;31(9):4142-4158. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05538-z. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜大弯折叠术在疗效和安全性方面的比较:一项Meta分析
Obes Surg. 2017 May;27(5):1358-1364. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2630-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Weight Loss, Gastrointestinal Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的中期结果:体重减轻、胃肠道症状及健康相关生活质量
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 31;58(1):64. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010064.

本文引用的文献

1
Data from quantitative serum proteomic analysis after laparoscopic gastric plication.腹腔镜胃折叠术后定量血清蛋白质组学分析数据。
Data Brief. 2019 May 30;25:104077. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104077. eCollection 2019 Aug.
2
A pilot study of laparoscopic gastric plication in adolescent patients with severe obesity.腹腔镜胃折叠术治疗青少年重度肥胖症的初步研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug;54(8):1696-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Lipid profile change after bariatric surgeries: laparoscopic gastric plication versus mini gastric bypass.
减肥手术后的血脂变化:腹腔镜胃折叠术与迷你胃旁路术对比
Acta Chir Belg. 2019 Jun;119(3):146-151. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1479022. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Outcomes of Reoperation After Laparoscopic Gastric Plication Failure.腹腔镜胃折叠术失败后的再手术结果。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):376-386. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3522-3.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Case-Matched Control Study.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的临床疗效比较:一项病例对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):387-393. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3527-y.
6
Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication: Intermediate Results and Factors Associated with Failure.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术:中期结果和与失败相关的因素。
Obes Surg. 2018 Dec;28(12):4087-4094. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3465-8.
7
Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症:短期和中期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Oct;28(10):3199-3212. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3330-9.
8
Comparison of Short-Term Effectiveness and Postoperative Complications: Laparoscopic Gastric Plication vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.短期疗效与术后并发症的比较:腹腔镜胃折叠术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):996-1001. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2951-8.
9
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication in Morbidly Obese Patients.病态肥胖患者腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术的疗效
J Obes. 2017;2017:7989714. doi: 10.1155/2017/7989714. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with a Body Mass Index of 30 to 35 kg/m².体重指数为30至35kg/m²的患者接受腹腔镜大弯折叠术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期结果
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Sep;58(5):1025-1030. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1025.