Yam L T, English M C, Janckila A J, Ziesmer S, Li C Y
Special Hematology Laboratory, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, KY 40202.
Acta Cytol. 1987 Nov-Dec;31(6):825-33.
In order to determine how best to study cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by immunocytochemical techniques, several crucial technical variables and five immunocytochemical methods were examined. Immunocytochemical studies could be performed on either cell suspensions or smears. The method using cell suspensions was more sensitive, producing less background staining, but requiring more cells than that using smears. Among the five methods examined, indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) and indirect immunoalkaline phosphatase (IAP) were comparable in sensitivity. The peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP), alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP) and avidin-biotin complex-immunoalkaline phosphatase (ABC-AP) methods were comparable in sensitivity and were more sensitive than either the IP or IAP technique. The peroxidase methods were plagued with problems related to endogenous enzyme activity and the ABC-AP method may exhibit undesirable background staining. Therefore, the IAP method should be used for cell suspensions and the APAAP for cells on smears. In CSF specimens with a small number of cells, immunocytochemical studies should be done on smears by the APAAP method. These conclusions are supported by our experience with CSF specimens from patients with reactive and neoplastic lymphocytoses.
为了确定如何通过免疫细胞化学技术最好地研究脑脊液(CSF)中的细胞,我们检测了几个关键的技术变量和五种免疫细胞化学方法。免疫细胞化学研究可对细胞悬液或涂片进行。使用细胞悬液的方法更灵敏,背景染色较少,但比使用涂片的方法需要更多细胞。在所检测的五种方法中,间接免疫过氧化物酶(IP)和间接免疫碱性磷酸酶(IAP)在灵敏度上相当。过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶(PAP)、碱性磷酸酶-抗碱性磷酸酶(APAAP)和抗生物素蛋白-生物素复合物-免疫碱性磷酸酶(ABC-AP)方法在灵敏度上相当,且比IP或IAP技术更灵敏。过氧化物酶方法存在与内源性酶活性相关的问题,ABC-AP方法可能会出现不理想的背景染色。因此,IAP方法应用于细胞悬液,APAAP方法应用于涂片上的细胞。在细胞数量少的脑脊液标本中,应采用 APAAP 方法对涂片进行免疫细胞化学研究。这些结论得到了我们对反应性和肿瘤性淋巴细胞增多症患者脑脊液标本研究经验的数据支持。