Salpini Romina, Malagnino Vincenzo, Piermatteo Lorenzo, Mulas Tiziana, Alkhatib Mohammad, Scutari Rossana, Teti Elisabetta, Cerva Carlotta, Yu La Rosa Katia, Brugneti Marta, Bertoli Ada, Rossi Benedetta, Holzmayer Vera, Gersch Jeffrey, Kuhns Mary, Cloherty Gavin, Ceccherini-Silberstein Francesca, Perno Carlo-Federico, Iannetta Marco, Andreoni Massimo, Sarmati Loredana, Svicher Valentina
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Tor Vergata University Hospital, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 18;8(11):1819. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111819.
The anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative status is frequent in HIV-infection and correlates with poor survival. Here, by highly-sensitive assays, we evaluate cryptic HBV replication and factors correlated with its detection in 81 anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients. Patients were treated for >12 months with HBV-active modern combined antiretroviral-therapy (cART) and had serum HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL by commercial Real-Time PCR. Serum HBV-DNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR, serum HBV-RNA by an Abbott research assay, and anti-HBc titer (proposed to infer intrahepatic cccDNA) by Lumipulse/Fujirebio. Cryptic serum HBV-DNA was detected in 29.6% of patients (median (IQR): 4(1-15) IU/mL) and serum HBV-RNA in 3.7% of patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active cART. Notably, cryptic serum HBV-DNA correlated with an advanced CDC-stage ( = 0.01) and a lower anti-HBs titer ( = 0.05), while serum HBV-RNA correlated with lower nadir CD4+ cell-count ( = 0.01). By analyzing serological HBV-markers, the combination of anti-HBs < 50 mIU/mL (indicating lower immune response) plus anti-HBc > 15COI (reflecting higher HBV replicative activity) was predictive of cryptic serum HBV-DNA (OR: 4.7(1.1-21.7), = 0.046, PPV = 62.5%, and NPV = 72%). In conclusion, cryptic HBV-replication (not detected by classical assays) characterizes a conspicuous set of anti-HBc-positive HIV-infected patients despite HBsAg-negativity and HBV-active combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). The integration of classical and novel markers may help identify patients with cryptic HBV-replication, thus optimizing the monitoring of anti-HBc-positive/HBsAg-negative HIV-infected patients.
抗-HBc阳性/HBsAg阴性状态在HIV感染中很常见,且与生存不良相关。在此,我们通过高灵敏度检测方法,评估了81例抗-HBc阳性/HBsAg阴性的HIV感染患者中隐匿性HBV复制情况及其相关因素。患者接受了超过12个月的具有HBV活性的现代联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART),且通过商业实时PCR检测血清HBV-DNA<20 IU/mL。采用液滴数字PCR定量血清HBV-DNA,采用雅培研究检测法检测血清HBV-RNA,采用Lumipulse/Fujirebio检测抗-HBc滴度(用于推断肝内cccDNA)。尽管患者HBsAg阴性且接受具有HBV活性的cART治疗,但仍有29.6%的患者检测到隐匿性血清HBV-DNA(中位数(四分位间距):4(1-15)IU/mL),3.7%的患者检测到血清HBV-RNA。值得注意的是,隐匿性血清HBV-DNA与CDC晚期(P=0.01)及较低的抗-HBs滴度(P=0.05)相关,而血清HBV-RNA与较低的最低点CD4+细胞计数相关(P=0.01)。通过分析血清学HBV标志物,抗-HBs<50 mIU/mL(表明免疫反应较低)加上抗-HBc>15COI(反映较高的HBV复制活性)的组合可预测隐匿性血清HBV-DNA(OR:4.7(1.1-21.7),P=0.046,阳性预测值=62.5%,阴性预测值=72%)。总之,尽管患者HBsAg阴性且接受具有HBV活性的联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART),但隐匿性HBV复制(经典检测方法未检测到)在一组显著的抗-HBc阳性HIV感染患者中较为常见。整合经典和新型标志物可能有助于识别隐匿性HBV复制患者,从而优化对抗-HBc阳性/HBsAg阴性HIV感染患者的监测。