Suppr超能文献

墨西哥在堕胎服务的可及性和质量方面存在不平等:任务分担能否成为增加合法和安全堕胎护理的机会?

Inequalities in access to and quality of abortion services in Mexico: Can task-sharing be an opportunity to increase legal and safe abortion care?

机构信息

Independent Consultants, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):25-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13002.

Abstract

First-trimester abortion became legal in Mexico City in April 2007. Since then, 216 755 abortions have been provided, initially in hospitals, by specialized physicians using surgical techniques. With time and experience, services were provided increasingly in health centers, by general physicians using medical therapies. Meanwhile, abortion remains legally restricted in the remaining 31/32 Mexican states. Demand and need for abortion care have increased throughout the country, while overall abortion-specific mortality rates have declined. In an effort to ensure universal access to and improved quality of reproductive and maternal health services, including abortion, Mexico recently expanded its cadres of health professionals. While initial advances are evident in pregnancy and delivery care, many obstacles and barriers impair the task-sharing/shifting process in abortion care. Efforts to expand the provider base for legal abortion and postabortion care to include midlevel professionals should be pursued by authorities in the new Mexican administration to further reduce abortion mortality and complications.

摘要

2007 年 4 月,墨西哥城将堕胎合法化。自此,已有 216559 例堕胎手术,最初在医院由专科医生采用外科技术实施,随着时间的推移和经验的积累,服务逐渐在医疗中心由普通医生采用医疗方法提供。与此同时,其余 31/32 个墨西哥州仍对堕胎进行法律限制。堕胎护理的需求和需要在全国范围内增加,而堕胎相关死亡率总体下降。为了确保普遍获得和改善生殖健康和孕产妇健康服务,包括堕胎服务,墨西哥最近扩大了卫生专业人员的队伍。虽然在妊娠和分娩护理方面取得了初步进展,但许多障碍和壁垒阻碍了堕胎护理中的任务分担/转移过程。新墨西哥政府当局应努力扩大合法堕胎和堕胎后护理的提供者基础,纳入中级专业人员,以进一步降低堕胎死亡率和并发症。

相似文献

2
Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: Can we still remain an island of liberties?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:63-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Constructing access to legal abortion services in Mexico City.
Reprod Health Matters. 2002 May;10(19):86-94. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(02)00018-6.
4
The extent of task-sharing implementation as a strategy to expand abortion services in Colombia.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12999.
5
Women's reports on postabortion family-planning services provided by the public-sector legal abortion program in Mexico City.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.018. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
6
Access to abortion under the heath exception: a comparative analysis in three countries.
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 13;15(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0548-x.
7
Mexican women seeking safe abortion services in San Diego, California.
Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(11):1060-9. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.673660.
8
How task-sharing in abortion care became the norm in Sweden: A case study of historic and current determinants and events.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):34-42. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13003.
9
Physicians' agreement with and willingness to provide abortion services in the case of pregnancy from rape in Mexico.
Contraception. 2009 Jan;79(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
10
Quantifying disparities in access to public-sector abortion based on legislative differences within the Mexico City Metropolitan Area.
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Cost Analysis of Surgical and Medical Uterine Evacuation Methods for First-Trimester Abortion Used in Public Hospitals in Mexico.
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Sep 23;15:11786329221126347. doi: 10.1177/11786329221126347. eCollection 2022.
4
Factors affecting the persistent use of sharp curettage for abortion in public hospitals in Mexico.
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211029763. doi: 10.1177/17455065211029763.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying disparities in access to public-sector abortion based on legislative differences within the Mexico City Metropolitan Area.
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Competence for basic midwifery practice: Updating the ICM essential competencies.
Midwifery. 2018 Nov;66:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
4
Who presents past the gestational age limit for first trimester abortion in the public sector in Mexico City?
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 7;13(2):e0192547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192547. eCollection 2018.
5
Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model.
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372-2381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31794-4. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
Health worker roles in safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception.
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Sep;3(9):e512-3. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00145-X. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
Nurse versus physician-provision of early medical abortion in Mexico: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Apr 1;93(4):249-58. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.143990. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验